State Animal Welfare Laws At Risk In Farm Bill

A typical pen format for swine in many Iowa animal feeding operations A confined swine feeding operation is shown in this photo. Congress is once again taking aim at state animal welfare laws regarding livestock confinement. (Photo by Kent Becker/U.S. Geological Survey)

Farm animal welfare rules might be rolled back by Congress

by Kevin Hardy, Iowa Capital Dispatch
June 4, 2026

Congress is looking to roll back state animal welfare laws as it wrangles over reauthorization of the federal farm bill.

The farm bill, which Congress generally reworks every five years, includes money and federal rules for food assistance programs, farm subsidies, and other ag-related programs.

A pending version of the legislation includes the Save Our Bacon Act, which would block states from regulating the raising of livestock. The measure takes direct aim at California’s Proposition 12, which requires farms to meet specific standards providing animals freedom of movement, cage-free confinement and minimum floor space.

A key component of California’s law effectively bans hog sow farms from using gestation crates — pens so small that mother pigs can’t even turn around. Currently, at least 15 states ban battery cages for egg-laying hens, gestation crates for sows or veal crates for calves.

California’s law includes protections for egg-laying hens, but the current farm bill proposal that Congress is considering specifically excludes them.

The California law also bars retailers from selling meats raised in other states that don’t meet the state’s standards. Opponents say that provision places a heavy burden on producers across the country who must meet different standards for different markets.

“This legislation will stop out-of-touch activists — who don’t know the first thing about farming — from dictating how Iowa farmers do their job,” U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson, an Iowa Republican, said when introducing the Save Our Bacon Act last year.

But supporters of the California law say consumers increasingly demand higher animal welfare standards. They note that farmers outside of California are free to ignore the law — if they choose not to sell into the nation’s most populous state.

A spokesperson for the California Department of Food and Agriculture, which enforces Proposition 12 regulations, said the agency could not comment on pending legislation.

California Assemblywoman Esmeralda Soria, the Democratic chair of the agriculture committee, said voters “spoke clearly” when more than 62% approved the 2018 ballot measure.

“Taking Prop 12 away now, would create long term uncertainty and disruption to California meat and egg production,” Soria said in a statement. “We can do better for California agriculture, and for the millions of people who rely on stable and affordable food systems.”

“This legislation will stop out-of-touch activists — who don’t know the first thing about farming — from dictating how Iowa farmers do their job.”  – U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson, Iowa Republican

Following an unsuccessful legal challenge to Proposition 12 by pork producers, lawmakers and ag interests have been pushing for years for federal action to block similar laws. While a similar anti-Proposition 12 measure was introduced in 2023 farm bill negotiations, the effort has gained some momentum after receiving bipartisan support in the U.S. House of Representatives, which approved the farm bill legislation by a 224-200 vote in late April. It’s now the subject of Senate negotiations.

The yearslong debate over agricultural regulations has inflamed tensions between states and the feds over who should regulate various sectors of the economy, mirroring ongoing debates about artificial intelligence and online prediction markets.

An issue of state autonomy

Most of the focus has centered on California, which has the world’s fourth largest economy. But opponents say the congressional proposal could upend hundreds of state laws and regulations.

An analysis by Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Clinic concluded that the Save Our Bacon Act could affect more than 600 state agricultural regulations, including seafood labeling requirements, food safety regulations and state restrictions aimed at preventing the spread of pests and diseases, such as the New World screwworm.

“Congress would be overturning the results of democratic elections and devaluing animal welfare investments made by livestock producers across the country,” researchers wrote, noting it would take years for regulators and courts to sort out implementation of the legal change, creating years of uncertainty for regulators, consumers and producers.

Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said he doesn’t agree with California’s mandates but said he would “defend to my dying day California’s right to self-determination.”

In an interview, Miller said Proposition 12 has driven up the price of eggs and pork. But he said the Constitution’s 10th Amendment clearly endows states with such power by reserving for the states those powers not delegated to the federal government.

“It is what it is,” he said. “I’m ready to move on and accept Prop 12.”

Miller, who recently lost the Republican primary for reelection, said producers who have poured millions into revamping their operations to ensure more space for animals would be “up a creek without a paddle” if the law is blocked by Congress.

“They spent all that money for nothing if that happens,” he said.

Proponents say consumers are already demanding higher standards.

“No one is mandated to sell in California, and I think that’s a really important piece of this. This is all market driven, and so there are other options,” said Alicia Prygoski, strategic legislative affairs manager for the Animal Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit advocating for animal protections.

Prygoski characterized Proposition 12 as a “common sense, reasonable measure” that allows animals the freedom to move and exhibit natural behaviors. She rejected arguments that such animal welfare laws create a burdensome patchwork of regulations for farmers, noting that states already have a variety of ag rules regarding animal imports, noxious weed transportation and zoonotic diseases.

‘We care a lot about our animals’

Trish Cook, who raises about 40,000 pigs per year on her family’s Iowa farm, said large-scale swine operations like hers rely on scientific guidance from groups such as the American Veterinary Medical Association and American Association of Swine Veterinarians.

Cook is a board member of the Iowa Pork Producers and the National Pork Producers Council, the latter of which unsuccessfully sued to block California’s Proposition 12. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision upheld California’s rules.

“Keeping a 500-pound gestating sow in a metal crate where she can’t ever turn around for the vast majority of her adult life is simply not good animal husbandry.”  – Alicia LaPorte, senior director of communications and impact at Niman Ranch

In April, the organization and the American Farm Bureau Federation wrote to congressional leaders arguing that Proposition 12 has created uncertainty across rural America, especially on small and medium-size farms that can’t afford to retrofit barns. The letter was signed by nearly 400 agricultural groups.

The issue is particularly relevant in Iowa, by far the nation’s largest pork producer with nearly one-third of American hogs raised there.

Cook said most pig farmers she knows are not producing Proposition 12-compliant pork because California’s demand is being met. But, she said, Congress must protect farmers before more states pass different rules and regulations.

“I do still feel like it’s really important that we get a fix for things like Prop 12, because this is just the beginning,” she said.

Cook said consumers across the country should have access to her pork products without following “arbitrary” rules created by state ballot measures. As an example, she cited the California requirement that each sow have access to 24 square feet of usable floor space. That footage allows the sow to turn around completely within its pen.

“If you didn’t enjoy raising pigs, you wouldn’t be in the business,” she said. “So we care a lot about our animals, we care about taking care of them, having them in the best facilities, and being comfortable with the climate that we provide them.”

Some producers, though, say they are troubled by the confinement systems commonly used in industrial agriculture.

“Keeping a 500-pound gestating sow in a metal crate where she can’t ever turn around for the vast majority of her adult life is simply not good animal husbandry,” said Alicia LaPorte, senior director of communications and impact at Niman Ranch, a national network of hundreds of farms producing what they call humanely raised meat.

Although Niman’s 500 hog farms have always been crate free, LaPorte said they have spent time and money ensuring compliance with California’s Proposition 12. She said the proposed legislation in Congress would pull the rug out from under family farmers who played by the rules and made huge investments to comply.

“They are actively devaluing these investments, disrupting stable markets and putting forward-thinking family farms at financial risk,” she said.

By moving away from confinement to more humane practices like group housing, LaPorte said producers can see increased profitability through improved sow health, lower stress and higher conception rates. And growing demand for such products pushed laws like Proposition 12 in the first place.

“The consumer drove the change,” she said, “and policy secured the marketplace.”

Stateline reporter Kevin Hardy can be reached at khardy@stateline.org

This story was originally produced by Stateline, which is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network which includes Iowa Capital Dispatch, and is supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gracious Closing To Hard Fought Campaign By Turek And Wahls

Photo: Iowa Capital Dispatch

This is how politics should be. I am proud of these two Iowa Democrats who understand what is at stake and know where the fight should be, going forward.

Josh Turek praised Zach Wahls.

“Zach has been an exceptional representative for his district and a true public servant for the people of Iowa.”

Zach Wahls pledged his full support of Josh Turek.

“A few minutes ago I called Rep. Josh Turek to congratulate him on his victory tonight and to pledge my full support as he takes on Ashley Hinson and the Republican political machine”

Onward!

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | Leave a comment

So You Want To Be A Farmer

At the Iowa Farm Table Podcast

More than 70% of farms in the U.S. have been lost over the past 125 years. Today less than 2% of Americans call farming their profession.

Yet, in a world with a changing climate and uncertain job market, many are looking to farming as a way to get back to the land, grow healthy food for their community, and discover a life full of meaning. But finding land and becoming a full fledged member of the family farm are essential first steps in the plan.

Beth Hoffman explores how securing land for beginning farmers isn’t just about creating business opportunity. It’s about revitalizing rural communities by giving the next generation the opportunity to farm again.

Thanks for listening to the At the Iowa Farm Table Podcast! Subscribe for free to receive new posts to your email inbox.  https://attheiowafarmtable.substack.com/

Voices

Carly McAndrews—Trowel and Error Farm

Kristiana Coutu—Beginning Farmer Center, Iowa State University

Jada Fife—Fife’s Fine Foods and Land Acquisition and Management Coordinator at SILT

Hannah Breckbill—Humble Hands Harvest  creator of Farmers Land Investment Cooperative, and Land Navigator.

Resources

New Census of Agriculture reveals more farms, more farmers in Iowa

Stay in the Loop

Stay connected to the latest in Iowa’s food system news. Subscribe to the Iowa Food System Coalition newsletter for timely news, action alerts, and event updates, all focused on supporting local farms and communities.

Please like and share this podcast if you enjoy it!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit attheiowafarmtable.substack.com

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Primary Election Today – Find Your Polling Place

The Primary Election is today [June 2nd]! Polls are open 7am to 8pm.  Find your polling place here.

Make a plan to vote!

✅Before or after work?

✅Where do you vote?

✅Are you registered? If not, you can register at the polls with proof of ID.

Find #UnionEndorsed candidates here: voteunioniowa.org

Here is a guide to voting in Iowa: https://voterready.iowa.gov/

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

You Are Legally Allowed To Take Time Off Work To Vote In Iowa

Primary election day is Tuesday, June 2nd. Find your polling location here. Iowa offers same-day registration for both early voting and on Election Day.  You can still vote early on Monday, June 1st.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Take Down Of Ashley Hinson’s First Ad

Rural Polling Place

Republican Representative Ashley Hinson’s first U.S. Senate television ad, “Believe,” makes claims voters should question.

She says “veterans deserve a hell of a lot better.” They do. Yet in 2022 she voted against the EVEST Act, which automatically enrolls eligible discharged veterans in VA health care (HR 4673, Roll Call 14). She also opposed the Guard and Reserve GI Bill Parity Act, extending benefits to reservists and National Guard members (HR 1836, Roll Call 6).

Her ad accuses healthcare companies of “ripping off” veterans, but her own record has hurt them. She supported DOGE cuts that eliminated VA positions in Cedar Rapids and Iowa City, contributing to lost benefits and longer wait times.

She also claims to support banning congressional stock trading, yet refused to sign the bipartisan discharge petition to force a vote on the issue (H.Res. 725, 12/2/2025).

The contrast between campaign rhetoric and congressional actions is clear. While backing cuts affecting veterans, she increased her net worth nearly tenfold to $7.5 million through congressional stock trading she appears unwilling to prohibit.

Trust what Ashley Hinson does, not what she says in paid advertising.

Here is some local analysis of the ad from KHOI’s Capitol Week.

Posted in Iowa politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Newspapers Now

Clipping from the March 4, 1923 Des Moines Register. Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Not long after the Kennedy assassination, Mother found me a job as a newspaper boy. Before dawn, I rode my bicycle to pick up a bundle of Des Moines Register dailies and deliver them. The homes were spread out because the Register was not our local paper. It was the route that was available. My goal was to take a paper from my bag, fold and toss it on the porch, as close to the door as possible, without getting off my bike. I could do it most of the time. I almost never saw my customers because the Register had centralized billing and I did not have to do collections. It was just me, my bicycle, and my newspaper bag in early morning darkness.

Even though I delivered newspapers for the Register, then the afternoon Times-Democrat, until starting high school, I seldom read them. I preferred to read books I selected at the public library. Once the job provided money of my own, I bought books at the drugstore near the end of my route. My customers did read the paper, though.

In 1965, the Des Moines Register, under the Cowles family who bought the paper in 1903, had become one of the nation’s premier regional newspapers, famous for statewide reporting, editorials, and investigative work. By the 1960s, it had national stature beyond the readers on my paper route. Newspapers weren’t “media” as we define that word today. They were the physical labor of printing and distributing newsprint, a community ritual. The ritual aspect was evidenced by some of my customers coaching me on where exactly on the porch they wanted to find their daily newspaper. Newspapers were part of the infrastructure of Midwestern life.

Readers sought newspapers to participate in community. Many were reading the same stories on the same day. They also sought noon radio news, and this was the time of the rise in nightly televised news which changed from 15 to 30 minutes in 1963. News was comparatively linear, bounded, and voluntary. A person made a conscious decision to sit down with a paper. The newspaper occupied a defined portion of the day. My work as a newspaper boy was the end of the line, though. Once delivered, newspapers and other news outlets did not actively pursue the reader’s attention.

My newspaper reading during and after high school and university was intermittent. In eighth grade, I completed a class project that involved clipping news stories and assembling them into an album. Later, at the University of Iowa, I regularly picked up the Daily Iowan to follow coverage of student anti-war demonstrations during the final years of the Nixon administration. The next newspaper-reading experience that stands out came while I was living in West Germany during the Cold War.

For three years I lived near the main railway station in Mainz, Germany. During scarce free time, I often walked to the station newsstand and bought copies of the International Herald Tribune, where many of the same stories published in the United States appeared in a reformatted international edition. The Stars and Stripes was also widely available, carrying American domestic news, sports, comics, and reports related to military affairs. By then I had become a steady consumer of news, both in print and through Armed Forces Radio, although the way I gave it attention differed little from my days as a newspaper boy.

In the military, I developed an identity that differed from the one I carried in civilian life. Mine became the “Iowan,” even though I had never thought much about Iowa as a defining identity before leaving home. During field exercises, bundles of Stars and Stripes arrived through the military supply chain and were distributed in the mess hall during meals. This Iowan and others like me read the paper not simply for information, but for reassurance that we were still participating in American life while stationed overseas.

I especially remember President Jimmy Carter’s 1978 trip to Wiesbaden during a state visit to West Germany. Our unit became involved in preparations for it. Afterward, reading about the visit in the newspaper felt like direct contact with public events. I saved newspaper clippings about Carter’s speech and the events. It felt like I was preserving pieces of history.

When I returned to Iowa after military service, many newspapers were experiencing strong financial performance. After the choppy waters of the 1970s—stagflation, a recession, and the fuel crisis—advertising remained strong. If a department store, grocery chain, automobile dealer, or realtor wanted to reach large numbers of local consumers, the newspaper remained the most efficient vehicle available. Newspapers were making money the way they printed advertisements.

This period of prosperity made diverse news coverage possible. In Iowa and elsewhere, newspapers could afford to send reporters across the state for feature stories, agricultural reporting, political campaigns, and local investigations because advertising revenue subsidized ambitious journalism. The Cowles family reaped the benefits of this period of economic growth. Eventually, though, they could not withstand the pressure of newspaper consolidation and were acquired by the Gannett Company, which later became USA Today.

What newspapers could not foresee during those profitable years was that their greatest vulnerability was not competition from other newspapers, television, or even radio. It was the transformation of human attention into a measurable and marketable commodity. Newspapers had always competed for readers, but they did not follow people through every idle moment of the day. Once the paper landed on the porch, the transaction was complete. Readers either opened it or they didn’t.

Writers such as Tim Wu in The Attention Merchants and Chris Hayes in The Sirens’ Call argue that modern media systems are designed not merely to inform but to capture and retain human attention. Digital platforms monitor clicks, scrolling behavior, viewing time, and engagement in ways newspapers never could. Earlier newspapers sought readers, but they could not track whether one page held attention longer than another. Modern systems can measure every interaction.

At first, newspapers participated enthusiastically in this transformation. Publishers moved content online, often giving it away free in the hope that digital advertising would replace print revenue. Instead, companies such as Google and Facebook absorbed much of the advertising income that once sustained local journalism. Classified ads virtually disappeared almost overnight. Newsrooms shrank. Stories increasingly came from wire services, syndicated material, and content-sharing agreements because local reporting had become expensive.

Today, when I open the digital edition of the Cedar Rapids Gazette, I find I already know many of the stories going in. During the day I encounter headlines through websites, social media, email alerts, and conversations. The newspaper no longer organizes the public’s attention in the way it once did. It now competes within a crowded marketplace where every platform seeks clicks, engagement, and time spent looking at a screen.

I still subscribe to a newspaper because they continue to provide something difficult to find elsewhere: a sense of deliberate attention. Someone has made decisions about what matters, arranged stories into a coherent order, and attempted to distinguish what is important. That older idea of news persists even as the economic and technological world that sustained it continues to disappear.

Our family first logged on to the internet using a personal computer and dial-up service on April 21, 1996. I didn’t anticipate how this new technology would change how I gathered news about our world and society. I certainly did not understand how media outlets would seek my attention and monetize it.

By then, the idea of a paperboy was more nostalgia than reality as adults began newspaper delivery in automobiles to cover a new set of challenges, including growing suburbs, declining circulation, and more complex logistics. The way newspapers are now is much different from when I tossed them on porches in early morning darkness.

While our sense of community changed, and newsprint has largely gone away, a newspaper remains important to our sense of community. There is value in that.

Posted in media | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The High Cost Of Nuclear Power

Nuclear power has significant economic, health, and environmental costs and poses safety hazards that far exceed those of any other type of energy. Meanwhile, state and federal lawmakers are pushing policies to incentivize “new nuclear” and even bring back to life closed nuclear plants like Three Mile Island. Join us for a special symposium to learn why this is a poor investment for our country and a risk to our health and environment.

PSR National and our network of chapters invite you to this one-hour event featuring speakers Dr. Philip Landrigan, Dr. Benjamin Sovacool, and Dr. M.V. Ramana. Dr. Caren Solomon will be moderating. Read their bios and more details here: https://psr.org/event/nuclear-power-symposium/

Register for the online meeting here.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

AI Deserves The Boos

Photo by Gustavo Fring on Pexels.com

I want to say something about artificial intelligence’s intrusion into life. Because the emerging technology is rapidly changing since public awareness of it increased a few years ago, whatever I might say seems unlikely to persist in relevance for long. For now, people I know reject it as something of value. Evidence is everywhere.

May commencements brought a share of public derision. Speakers were being booed after bringing up AI and touting its benefits, notably former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Gloria Caulfield, a real estate executive. Graduates face a difficult labor market, and a technology that could make it more difficult to find a job was neither welcome nor news.

There is a lot to hate about Schmidt, but who is Gloria Caulfield? She comes from the Lake Nona development world, a 17-square-mile, master-planned smart city and innovation hub in Orlando, Florida. To her, AI and related innovation represent modernization, economic growth, and future competitiveness. She thought her speech was relevant, yet graduates in media, arts, and communications heard another warning that the professions they trained for may become more unstable. No wonder they booed.

Among problems encountered by recent college graduates are that their work internships are not turning into jobs as employers don’t accept that as experience. The use of resume scanners instead of a human is off-putting. The struggle to talk to a human at a prospective employer creates uncertainty. In addition, there are fewer jobs out there. Entry level positions are viewed as most likely targets of AI-driven automation. These things put together create stress in graduating seniors. AI is simply one more thing.

When I’m working at my desk I have a Twitch stream on in the background. The community is more than five years old with a good group of regulars I’ve gotten to know, some of them in real life. To a person, they are not fans of artificial intelligence. When the chat turns to AI, rejection is immediate. There are reasons for that, although the discussion never gets to them.

In part, this cohort spent years adapting to unstable working conditions. They are well-versed in the digital world, and a bit weary of yet another technology purporting to make their lives better when so many new technologies did not fulfill their hype and promise. They lived through outsourcing, remote work transitions, automation, software churn, layoffs, and constant demands to retrain or rebrand themselves professionally. AI is yet another source of volatility in the job market, yet another skills race with no certain outcome, and one more way to jimmy-jack the job market to the advantage of business interests.

My Twitch cohort is mostly of digital natives likely to have played Oregon Trail in school computer labs, and first experienced the internet by loading a disk into their home computer to access by dial-up on a phone line. They have seen it all and the commercial nature of AI represents nothing special. They are tired of the next new thing.

Why don’t I like it? The theft, mainly.

In October 2025, my blog got a dramatic increase in number of views from a single source. By dramatic, I mean in September the view count was 2,800, and October was 51,335. Most of these views took place from Oct. 7-9, or roughly 12 views per minute on average. The views were of individual posts going back to the first still existing online. Obviously a machine was doing this “viewing.” To what end, I don’t know, but I suspect AI training.

A local used bookseller reported a surprising number of recent online purchases of obscure books, to the tune of 500 orders per week. They feared the worst, that the purchasing was algorithm driven to acquire the books, tear off the covers, scan the pages for AI, and then discard them. In aggregate, taking millions of used books out of the marketplace. The Washington Post recently ran a story about this operation. This is a clear intrusion into what many of us believe are social norms—people buy books to read and cherish them. It represents AI theft.

I use artificial intelligence almost daily, mostly through Google’s Gemini which is now embedded into the search function. I also use ChatGPT for more complex questions. Both provide responses quickly but I find half of them problematic, or more simply said, they are garbage. Crappy work product makes AI just one more suspect opinion in a society where there is a lot of that going around.

Likely a machine designed the rollout of artificial intelligence to more public use. As is typical, the machines missed the human factor, which is another reason to boo.

Posted in Labor | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Upcoming Battle Starts Now

I get just as frustrated with the Democratic party as anyone, but more than that I am sick of everyone piling on like high school.

Democrats didn’t cause our current situation.  If our party is guilty of anything it’s of underestimating the Republicans’ bad intent.  We’re guilty of not being clear-eyed enough about them, about MAGA, about Trump in particular, about their propaganda, and now we are coming to understand we weren’t clear-eyed enough about our own Republicans in congress and in Des Moines.

Democrats are on the right side of the issues and history while Trump tries to destroy everything. Our party has been guilty of not knowing how to cope with Republican money, media, power, aggressiveness and corruption. Seems like when the going gets tough we usually stand down and hope to survive the next contest. So many problems, so little cardboard…

Lately, Ken Martin, our current chair has been blasted for not releasing the report of mistakes made in 2024.  The DNC under Ken Martin’s leadership is heading in the right direction, correcting the things that we have done wrong over time.  Many have no idea what the DNC has been doing that is helping our campaigns since he became chair.

But it’s not that hard to find out.  The DNC now has a weekly update from the DNC Grassroots team called the Blue Print and a YouTube channel. Find out for yourself what Dems are doing. Rita Hart has been talking about it. State party chairs are talking about it. Here is Jane Kleeb discussing investment in Democratic party infrastructure.

Ken Martin has acknowledged his mistake in not releasing the report. (Has anyone in the Republican party ever done that?)  You can read Ken’s statement about it here on the Blue Print substack.

As Simon Rosenberg says, “Everyone in Washington is not a corrupt piece of shit.” 

 Btw, the false narrative that everyone in DC is a corrupt piece of shit is helpful to Republicans because they need us to believe everyone is as bad as they are.

Below is an excerpt from a piece published on The Hill balancing some of the one-sided crapping on Democrats that has been out there. You can read the entire piece here.

“Just look at what Martin is actually building. The DNC, in partnership with the Association of State Democratic Committees, is delivering more than $1 million every month to all 57 state and territorial parties — the largest sustained investment in state parties in our history.

And Red-state parties are receiving an additional $5,000 per month through the Red State Fund. State parties from Mississippi to Alaska are growing their staff and infrastructure for the first time in years. This is the strategy Howard Dean used to deliver the 2006 and 2008 wave elections. It works.

It also happens to be the strategy we desperately need. The Clinton campaign in 1992 contested more than two dozen states. In 2024, we played in just seven.

In other words, we spent three decades surrendering the map, and the math is now closing in on us. Population projections for the 2030 Census show between eight and 12 electoral votes shifting from blue states to red states ahead of the 2032 presidential election. If we keep writing off Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and the rest of the Sun Belt, we will lose the Electoral College permanently.

Martin understands this. His critics, evidently, do not.

Meanwhile, the actual results keep coming in. Democrats have won or at least over performed in hundreds of special elections under Martin’s leadership. We swept Virginia and New Jersey in November 2025. Grassroots fundraising hit record levels in his first months as chair — more than any DNC chair raised in his first four months, ever — and continues at an historic pace. Small-dollar donors are responding to the strategy because they understand what it is for: building Democratic power in places where Democrats have not shown up in a generation.”

more

Simon Rosenberg of Hopium Chronicles is one of my few paid memberships as one of the most reliable sources of information on the current electoral environment. He gave some advice to the Hopium community on his substack platform this week.  I think it is realistic.

“This is going to be a brual election and we have to brace ourselves for it. 

“Spend time watching the way they are attacking James Tavarico and come to a place of understanding about what we’re going to be up against this year everywhere in every single race.”

There’s going to be AI generated images of [candidates] having the equivalent of dinner with the devil, every day throughout the entire general election. Which is why we need to provide them the resources required to be able to anticipate all of this and get out ahead of it.

With Talarico they’ve signaled in the last 24 hours the way they’re going to play the game. It’s why we need candidates who can survive the unbelievably brutal kind of attacks that are going to come against them.”

Happy Friday everyone!

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment