The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

For IA Sec of
Agriculture

Francis Thicke

Search

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Daily Archive

August 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Categories

Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  Dx: Fear Rx: The Facts about Health Care Reform - Socialized Medicine

Dx: Fear Rx: The Facts about Health Care Reform – Socialized Medicine


by Alta Price, M.D.


(cross posted at Quadsville.com in Dr Dx’s Blog)

 

HR 3200 is a good bill. It is not a perfect bill. But it is good enough that a far left progressive (yours truly) and the American Medical Association (not big on socialized medicine) both support it. You can bet if the myths about socialized medicine, physician payments, or government interfering with the practice of medicine were true, the AMA would not approve. You can read the AMA letter to Charlie Rangel here saying what they like about the bill (that exact expression must have been on Rep. Rangel’s face when he opened the AMA letter – hehe).

 

Parts of the bill the AMA likes include: expanding the availability of affordable health care coverage to the uninsured, increased support for prevention and wellness services, investments in the physician workforce, and increasing Medicare payments for primary care services without cutting payments for other services. There are more technical sections in HR 3200 vital to doctors and hospitals about how government plans, like Medicare and Medicaid, decide what to pay them. You don’t need to worry about these obscure laws and formulas, until they pay doctors so little they stop taking Medicare or Medicaid patients or hospitals can’t keep their doors open.

 

The AMA will lobby for some changes to the bill. They want federal support to states that implement liability reform (i.e., to control the cost of medical malpractice insurance) and they want to preserve patient access to physician-owned hospitals.

 

Finally, let’s talk about “socialized medicine”. Socialized medicine is when the government owns the health care facilities and pays the doctors’ salaries. The AMA is mightily opposed to this approach. The public option in HR 3200 in no way sets up this type of system. In our current government run health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid, hospitals and doctors are not owned or employed by the government. On the other hand, the VA health care system is socialized medicine, since the hospitals are owned and the physicians are employed by the federal government. (And isn’t it ironic that those anti-reformers most terrified of “socialized medicine” think that the socialized medicine VA system provides excellent care, better than our non-socialized Medicare and Medicaid programs?) Other examples of socialism in the United States include our public schools, police and fire departments, public libraries, and postal service.

 

Dr Dx (in the interests of full disclosure, I’ve been an AMA member for years)

 

****************************************************************

Here are some of the false claims relating to socialized medicine, physician pay, and physician self-referral made about the House bill, HR 3200 (you can read the full text of the bill here). The Truth comes from Health Care for America Now, one of the lead coalition groups fighting for health care reform.

 

"Page 127: The AMA sold doctors out: the government will set wages." 

TRUTH: The government will negotiate rates with providers under the public health insurance plan option. However, private insurers will continue to pay their own rates.

"Page 239: Bill will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors and the poor most affected." 

TRUTH: This section has nothing whatsoever to do with reducing services. It makes much needed changes to the way in which physician reimbursement is recalculated every year. The bill will, in fact, create much more opportunity for seniors and the poor to receive necessary care.

"Page 241: Doctors: no matter what specialty you have, you'll all be paid the same (thanks, AMA!)" 

TRUTH:  Page 241 does not say this. Nowhere does it say this. It does say that physicians will be grouped into certain categories regardless of specialty.  These categories merely determine if the physician is engaged in primarily therapeutic or preventative care.

 

"Page 253: Government sets value of doctors' time, their professional judgment, etc."

TRUTH: There is no good response to this assertion as it appears to have been made up completely. The section deals with 'misvalued codes' meaning that the government is potentially not paying an acceptable rate for a specific service. This will allow the government to, for example, pay more for services that require more payment, such as high-overhead procedures. The author of these criticisms separately attacks the bill for paying the same rate to all doctors, then attacks again for paying different rates.

 

"Page 265: Government mandates and controls productivity for private healthcare industries." 

TRUTH: This section amends the Social Security Act to include productivity measures.  There is no mandate or control of anything. This merely updates the way in which doctors and hospitals are paid through Medicare.

"Page 298: Doctors: if you treat a patient during an initial admission that results in a readmission, you will be penalized by the government." 

TRUTH: This is patently false. The section is about possible methods that the Secretary of Health and Human services might consider in order to address the growing problem of patient readmission. This section does not, in any way, create a penalty, nor does it even mandate policy. It merely provides examples of recourses that might be considered.

"Page 317: Doctors: you are now prohibited from owning and investing in healthcare companies!"

TRUTH: This provision only limits Doctor's investments in health care facilities that they refer patients to. The effort to limit self-referral has been ongoing for many years as an effort to reduce fraud and abuse.  This is, essentially, the medical community equivalent of insider trading. Limiting this incentive works to put the patient's health above all other considerations. Doctors remain free to engage in investment opportunities in areas that don't create a significant conflict of interest.

"Page 318: Prohibition on hospital expansion. Hospitals cannot expand without government approval."

TRUTH: This section regulates physicians' investment in hospitals to make sure that physicians are not unfairly benefiting from their power to refer patients to hospitals they have a stake in. The section does not prohibit hospital expansion.

Dr Dx will be back on Monday.

View Article  An Ounce of Prevention and a Pound of Letting Go
An Ounce of Prevention and a Pound of Letting Go

by Paul Deaton

"After eight hours of lifting barrels, about the only thing I felt like doing after work was hitting the tavern when it opened at 6:00 AM and then heading home to crash and sleep."


Something seems missing in the current discussion regarding the health care bills in congress, and it is significant.


I first understood the words “sick care” in 2007 at a public health conference in Columbus, Ohio. Dr. Julie Gerberding, then director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, laid out the human lifecycle of dollars spent on health care in the United States, with its focus on treating diseases once they are diagnosed. Most of the current health care dollars are spent on people who are sick, thus “sick care.” According Dr. Gerberding, $300 million spent in disease prevention would represent a big step in reducing the overall cost of health care, if congress were willing to appropriate the funds. The cost of treatment of cardio-respiratory disease, diabetes and lung cancer would be less, if treated early. This makes sense and it appears that congress will do something to fund preventative health measures in their reform work.

Where the discussion of “health reform” and “prevention” has gotten off the track, is in the implied and stated discussion that “people need to have better control of their behavior” regarding health. John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, Inc. recently stated this argument succinctly, “Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.” The argument asserts that people are lazy and if they applied themselves, we wouldn’t have this health care problem.

Baloney! When I was in college, I worked for two summers in a meat packing plant. It was a union job, paying $4.04 an hour, and I worked the graveyard shift cleaning up after the day’s production. One job involved cleaning 65 pound stainless steel barrels. After eight hours of lifting barrels, about the only thing I felt like doing after work was hitting the tavern when it opened at 6:00 AM and then heading home to crash and sleep. Going out to jog, bicycle or exercise was not in the cards because I was too tired and most of the rest of the day was spent getting ready for the next shift.

The idea that working people are too lazy to care for themselves is preposterous. When a person makes a commitment to work for a company for wages, on a regular schedule, there is a significant sacrifice in lifestyle and control of the work life. A culture of “jobs” and the work life it engenders may well be a significant part of the health cost problem. Politicians say they want to create jobs, and a majority of people want a job, but this aspect of work life can be problematic and is not being addressed in the current discussions about health reform.

Put this in context. Childhood obesity has become a significant issue regarding the health consequences and related health care costs it is expected to create in the United States. Children are not to blame for this epidemic. From an early age, they are barraged with messages about processed foods, sugary drinks and sweet and salted snacks. Combine this with less time “playing” outside and more time in sedentary activities and no wonder there is a problem.

Parents love their children and want to do right by them. In a life of “job culture,” their time outside the 10-12 hour workday commitment to their job is limited. Combine that with the extracurricular activities at school, family relationships and household chores and the idea of changing behavior seems near impossible. It is accomplishment enough to get through a busy day.

Processed foods are convenient and family gatherings are simple pleasures that are hard to deny. If there is a cooler of inexpensive drinks and a bowl of salted or sweetened snacks, then we feel we have earned the right to these things. Besides, the advertising dollars spent to promote processed foods tells us it’s alright to consume them, and frame up arguments that these food products are “all natural” or “healthy.” While the idea to “eat fresh, eat local,” or as Mackey says, “make healthy lifestyle choices” may help reduce the incidence and severity of childhood obesity, it is simply not in the cards for most families where both spouses work a “job.” Add on the misinformation about taxing foods that are bad for us, and it is no wonder people are frustrated with the legislative process related to health care.

At some point, we need to let go of the politicians and let them govern regarding health care, health insurance, health reform, health care reform, health insurance reform, or whatever we currently call the complicated and multi-faceted pieces of legislation that are driving the mainstream media frenzy around this story. As a people, we seem to be keeping politicians on a very tight leash, to the point that it may be counterproductive.

I hope that once the August slate of constituent visits in Iowa is finished, Congressman Loebsack, and Senators Harkin and Grassley return to Washington and get something positive done regarding health care, something that addresses prevention at some level. We should speak our minds about health reform and then pipe down and let the legislators work. We have to trust the people we elected to do good. We can always send them home during the next election cycle if we are unhappy with their results.

~Paul Deaton is a native Iowan living in rural Johnson County. Check out his blog, Big Grove Garden.

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

How Your Kids Can Help Save the World

FreeKibble.com

FreeKibbleKat.com

Help end world hunger

Iowa Sites

AFSCME Iowa

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Partnership

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

Iowa Rapid Response Action

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

The Least, First

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

One Iowa (GLBT)

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Renewable Energy Group

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Big Grove Garden

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Essential Estrogen

Green Tea Blog

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Rapid Response Blog

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Nick Johnson's Blog

Political Fallout

Popular Progressive

The Rural Populist

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Iowa Rapid Response Action

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media