The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Daily Archive

September 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30

By Year

Categories

Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  2005: The Top 10 Stories the Mainstream Media Missed
2005: The Top 10 Stories the Mainstream Media Missed

by Molly Ivins, Project Censored

A list of important stories the mainstream media overlooked, omitted, or were just too lazy to cover

       
No. 1: Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open GovernmentThis administration has drastically changed the rules on Freedom of Information Act requests; has changed laws that restrict public access to federal records, mostly by expanding the national security classification; operates in secret under the Patriot Act; and consistently refuses to provide information to Congress and the Government Accountability Office. The cumulative total effect is horrifying.

No. 2: Iraq Coverage - faulted for failure to report the results of the two battles for Fallujah and the civilian death toll. The civilian death toll story is hard to get - accurate numbers nowhere - but the humanitarian disaster in Fallujah comes with impeccable sources.


No. 3: Distorted Election Coverage. Faulting the study that caused most of the corporate media to dismiss the discrepancy between exit polls and the vote tally; and the still-contentious question of whether the vote in Ohio needed closer examination.


No. 4: Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In. It's another seep 'n' creep story, where the cumulative effect should send us all shrieking into the streets - the Patriot Act, the quiet resurrection of the MATRIX program, the REAL ID Act, which passed without debate as an amendment to an emergency spending bill funding troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.


No. 5: United States Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia. Oops. Ugh.


No. 6: The Real Oil for Food Scam. The oil-for-food story was rotten with political motives from the beginning - the right used it to belabor the United Nations. The part that got little attention here was the extent to which we, the United States, were part of the scam. Harper's magazine deserves credit for its December 2004 story, "The UN is Us: Exposing Saddam Hussein's Silent Partner."


No. 7: Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood. That a lot of journalists are getting killed in Iraq is indisputable.


No. 8: Iraqi Farmers Threatened by Bremer's Mandates. It's part of the untold story of the disastrous effort to make Iraq into a neo-con's free-market dream. Order 81 issued by Paul Bremer "made it illegal for Iraqi farmers to reuse seeds harvested from new varieties registered under the law." Iraqi farmers were forced away from traditional methods to a system of patented seeds, where they can't grow crops without paying a licensing fee to an American corporation.


No. 9: Iran's New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency. The effects of Iran's switching from dollars to Euros in oil trading.


No. 10: Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy. A classic case of a story not unreported but underreported - a practice so environmentally irresponsible it makes your hair hurt to think about it.


(Click here to read the complete article.)


Molly Ivins is the former editor of the liberal monthly The Texas Observer. She is the bestselling author of several books, including Who Let the Dogs In?

View Article  TV Brouhaha in Iowa
TV Brouhaha in Iowa

by Allison Romano, Broadcasting & Cable

Hey, look at this - and just in time for Blog for Iowa's Focus on Media Week!  Iowans for Better Local TV is featured in this week's Broadcasting & Cable!

The article is actually accurate, except for the fact that IBLTV is located in Iowa City, NOT Cedar Rapids.  And they even mentioned next week's upcoming FCC meeting in Iowa City.

BFIA hats off to our own Trish Nelson and the IBLTV team.  Some well-deserved recognition, to be sure - not to mention some great coverage for an important cause.  See an excerpt below.


Every few weeks, 15 or so [Iowa City], Iowa, residents huddle at the library to plot another attack on one of the country's biggest TV-station owners. Iowans for Better Local TV is taking aim at the Sinclair Broadcast Group, which operates 60 stations nationwide, including local CBS affiliate KGAN. Frustrated by what the group says is inadequate local-news and community involvement, they are noisily pressuring Sinclair.

“We want to put Iowa values back into the product,” says Arron Wings, one of the group's founders. “We want [the] local aspect back in their news and more connection to the local community.”

RIGHT-WING AGENDA?

Iowans for Better Local TV (IBLTV) is circulating petitions and explaining their position to the media, and even considering filing a petition with the FCC to deny KGAN's license renewal. And when FCC commissioners Michael J. Copps and Jonathan Adelstein visit Iowa City for a town-hall meeting on the future of media on Oct. 5, IBLTV members plan to further vent their frustrations.

KGAN, like most Sinclair stations, mixes locally-created news with mass-produced fare from its centralized newsroom, News­Central. One feature is “The Point,” a nightly editorial by Sinclair PR head Mark Hyman. Critics say Hyman's editorials are a way for the company to push a right-wing agenda over public airwaves. In eastern Iowa, viewers see Hyman on KGAN's 10 p.m. news and also on a Sinclair-produced newscast on the local Fox affiliate KFXA.

(Click here to read the rest of the article.)


View Article  Sinclair and the Public Airwaves: A History of Abuse
Sinclair and the Public Airwaves: A History of Abuse

SinclairWatch

Despite lacking a household name, Sinclair Broadcasting Group is the largest owner of local TV stations in the country — they own more than 62 stations in 39 different TV markets, including KGAN and KFXA in Cedar Rapids and KDSM in Des Moines. Their programming reaches more than 1/4 of all U.S. households, making them an extremely powerful gatekeeper of information. Yet it appears that Sinclair has repeatedly abused that power.

Sinclair has become infamous for:

Conflicts of Interest - Whether in the form of programming decisions (such as the censorship of Nightline) or financial contributions, Sinclair has consistently supported exclusively Republican politicians who have pushed to loosen media ownership rules so that giants like Sinclair can grow even bigger.

The practice of "Central-casting" - Sinclair pipes pre-recorded weather, news, and right-wing editorial commentary to local affiliates from a central studio in Maryland, creating the false appearance of 'local' news, killing off real localism, and eliminating local jobs.

Its quest for more local stations - The company continues to seek control of more stations in local communities than is allowed under FCC rules (despite being fined in 2001), and maintains a legally and ethically questionable relationship with an apparent 'front' company that serves only to buy stations in cities where Sinclair cannot.

Now we want to hold Sinclair accountable — but we need your help to do it.

Find out more: read the full report, Sinclair and the Public Airwaves: A History of Abuse.


Click here to learn more about:

 Iowans for Better Local TV (IBLTV)

If you can't come to the town meeting, you can still

sign our petition to the FCC


View Article  Media Consolidation and Indecency - the Link
Media Consolidation and Indecency - the Link

Center for Creative Voices in Media

A recent study by the Center for Creative Voices in Media suggests that among other problems, media consolidation has led to a rise in indecency on our airwaves.

Creative Voices's study, "Ownership Concentration and Indecency in Broadcasting: Is There a Link?" finds that from 2000 to 2003, four of the nation's largest radio companies were responsible for 96% of FCC indecency fines, while their stations accounted for only about half of the country's listening audience.

The study points out that some of the politicians who are now trying to crack down on indecency by raising fines on broadcasters are the same ones who voted in 1996 to relax ownership rules that contributed to concentration. The report concludes that, "One of the unintended consequences of their support of deregulation is an increase in indecency."

Rather than increase fines for indecency, the report suggests that a more effective and First Amendment-friendly approach to the indecency problem would be to reintroduce meaningful station ownership caps, limit vertical integration of program ownership, and promoting localism and diversity of voices in our nation’s media.

(source)

Click here to read the full report.

Click here to read FCC Commissioner Copps' comments on the study.

View Article  Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps on Broadcast Localism
Statement of FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps on Broadcast Localism

In 2003, the FCC voted to relax ownership rules, paving the way for increased media consolidation.  In 2004, the courts rejected these rules.  The FCC then announced a Notice of Inquiry to investigate further.  The following is an excerpt of Commissioner Copps' dissenting opinion arguing that the issues are clear, and it is time for action.

[July 1, 2004]

From the earliest days of broadcasting, we have obligated licensees to serve the needs and interests of their local communities.  The principle of localism is at the heart of the public interest.  I support the Commission’s renewed interest in promoting localism, although we should have examined these issues prior to loosening our media concentration protections, not after those rules were gutted.  


During the hearings and forums on media ownership that Commissioner Adelstein and I attended across the country, we heard time and again from citizens about the detrimental impact that consolidation has already had on localism and diversity and we heard their fears about where still more concentration will lead.   Localism is one of the fundamental goals of our ownership rules and of the public interest.  I believe that it is impossible to divorce localism from ownership.  With the consolidation genie out of the bottle, it will be too late then to stem the tide.  

Enhancing political and civic discourse:  
From 1996 to 2000, coverage of the Presidential race on the network evening news dropped by one-third.  The average Presidential candidate sound bite in 2000 was 8 to 9 seconds.  Local newscasts fared no better.  In the 2002 election, over half of the evening local newscasts contained no campaign coverage at all.  What coverage there is tends to focus inordinately on the latest tracking polls and handicapping the horse race rather than on the serious issues the nation needs to be discussing.  And when you get down to the Congressional and local races, the situation is even more dismal.  We also see less public affairs programming.  One survey found less than one half of one percent of programming is devoted to local public affairs.  We have studies.  We have comments.  We don’t have action.

Community-responsive programming and License Renewals:  Broadcast stations have an obligation to air programming responsive to the needs and interests of their communities of license…As one part of the effort to ensure that licensees are serving their local communities, we desperately need to establish an effective license renewal process under which the Commission would once again actually consider the manner in which a station has served the public interest when it comes time to renew its license.  One thing is certain: the current system of postcard renewal for licenses is not serving the public interest.

Communication with Communities: As local stations come under the control of far-away media conglomerates, it is time to move forward and act. ..When the issue is how to hold Big Media accountable to the local communities they serve, we are stuck at the starting gate.  The better part of good government here is to move ahead and act on those matters where we already have compiled a record or where the statute has long since told us to be about our job of protecting the public interest.

(click here to read the entire opinion)

(click here to learn more about localism)


View Article  Which Way To The Internet?
Which Way To The Internet?


As my contribution today to "Focus on the Media" week, I'll point out a rather contentious point in media control:

Freepress.net is featuring efforts and policy proposals  that allow municipalities to create what is known as "community internet".

Several communities in Iowa have offered, either through public solutions, or shared public/private ventures:  you can see a listing of some of the efforts here.

What is of particular interest to Iowans is broadband internet access to rural communities and rural areas.  The Rural Broadband Coalition notes the following:

Rural America, which is home to nearly a quarter of the nation’s population, comprises 75 percent of this nation’s landmass. Competition and active participation in today’s vigorous new economy requires not only a computer, but also high-speed, high-capacity (broadband) access to information and data on the Internet. While the Internet is changing the world economy, technology experts say, “large parts of rural America are losing out on jobs, economic development and civic participation” because of inadequate access to the Internet. Traversing vast expanses of remote and often rugged topography presents unique financial and technological barriers.

There are those that oppose the notion that municipalites and communities should invest in broadband internet capability, from the standard argument that the private sector would be far better at providing said services.

The two questions I have to pose in that regard:  when did cable providers finish putting in place the infrastructure for cable television in rural areas?

(The answer:  "They haven't, and were never that serious about it.")

Will internet access be a far more important tool for economic development than cable television?  If so, communities have the right to invest in their future - just as they have the right to provide other basic utilities in lieu of private sector competition.


Please share with us your success stories in using - or fighting for - community internet access below.

View Article  Why You Should Care Who Serves on the FCC
   Why You Should Care Who Serves on the FCC 
NicholasJohnson.Org

The following appeared as a guest column in the Cedar Rapids Gazette.

by Nicholas Johnson

It’s election time. School board? Nope, done that. City council? Not yet.  U.S. senators? The president? Members of congress? None of their six-, four- and two-year terms are up this fall.

The election I’m talking about only comes round every eight years — and this is the year in Iowa. Mark Oct. 5 on your calendar.

Given the attention this election receives, you’re excused for not knowing. But the outcome may have more impact on you, your family and community than many of the other elections combined.

I’m talking about who gets to control the most powerful mass communications medium humankind has ever unleashed upon itself. Who gets to use the local airwaves that we, the public, own.

With TV sets running seven hours a day, children spending more time with television than teachers, each of us will have spent 13 years of life watching TV before we die. Indeed, TV watching has become ‘‘life’’ for many. So how do we vote?

Like elected officials, broadcasters have limited terms. When I was a commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission, TV licenses lasted three years. Now they’re eight. Most incumbent officials get re-elected and most TV owners get renewed. But neither has a right to get re-elected or renewed. They both have to ‘‘run on their record.’’

All TV licenses in a given state expire on the same day. Iowa’s TV licensees file for renewal Oct. 1. Audience members have from October through December to file comments with the FCC. Feb. 1 is renewal day.

What’s unique this year are two FCC commissioners, Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein, who think Washington should come to us. They sided with the millions of Americans who opposed the FCC’s giveaway to big media. Now they’re about to hold what may be the first-ever FCC hearing in Iowa. Sponsors include the national media reform organization Free Press, the University of Iowa’s Lecture Committee, Iowans for Better Local TV, and numerous other groups.

The hearing will be in Iowa City at the Pomerantz Center (at the corner of Market Street and T. Anne Cleary Walkway) at 7 p.m. Oct. 5.  Park in the Iowa Memorial Union or North ramps.  This may well be one of the fall's biggest events after football. 

And before the forum, Iowans will have a chance to find out about how media policy affects broadcast ownership and content, and get help preparing a two-minute statement to present at the forum.

Workshops will take place at:

7 p.m. Wednesday at the Community of Christ Church, 1500 Blairs Ferry Rd., Hiawatha;

10:30 a.m. Saturday at the LULAC Club, 4224 Ricker Hill Rd. in Davenport;

2 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 2, in Room A of the Iowa City Public Library;

6 p.m. Oct. 4 at the AFSCME Office in Eastdale Plaza, 1700 S. First St., Iowa City.

For details, click here.

 Why should we care?

It’s said humans are no more conscious of the mediated environment in which we live than fish are conscious of the water in which they live. Yet polluted media is no better for us than polluted water is for fish.

Numerous studies document that violence in TV programs increases real-life violence in our communities.

Walter Lippmann and Noam Chomsky speak of the media’s ‘‘manufacturing consent.’’ Even when TV isn’t telling us what to think, it’s telling us what to think about. Except when, druglike, it’s designed to obliterate all thought.

Time for ‘‘local news’’ can become so consumed with commercials, national stories, weather, fires, commentary and sports that viewers are left unaware of the most serious problems — and opportunities — they confront. Such as Iowa’s employment challenges, trends in land ownership, high school student achievement, and polluted waterways.

The FCC requires TV stations to provide programs that serve children’s educational needs. Are they doing it? Or are they telling our daughters ‘‘success’’ requires they reshape their bodies to look like starved models?

Contrary to all the world’s great religions, TV preaches — with programs, product placement and commercials — that happiness, indeed our very identity and life’s purpose, is to be found in hedonism and conspicuous consumption. We will be known by the companies we keep.

Meanwhile, the FCC is permitting licensees to control more and more stations and other media. When I was there, the limit was 7 AM, 7 FM and 7 television stations. Today, five corporations control most of our country’s media. One operates 1,200 radio stations.

They’re your airwaves. Oct. 5 is your opportunity to speak up. Be there.

_______________

Nicholas Johnson of Iowa City is a former FCC commissioner who teaches at the University of Iowa College of Law.  Click here to visit his website.

(Link to the article)


Click here to learn more about
 Iowans for Better Local TV (IBLTV)
If you can't come to the town meeting, you can still
sign our petition to the FCC
View Article  SCIENTISTS DOUBT EXISTENCE OF DEMOCRATS
SCIENTISTS DOUBT EXISTENCE OF DEMOCRATS

The Borowitz Report

Opposition Party Could Be Black Hole, Experts Say

With George W. Bush’s approval ratings plummeting in recent weeks, the inability on the part of Democrats to capitalize on [Bush]’s waning fortunes has caused some leading scientists to postulate that the Democratic Party may not exist at all.

Dr. Marisa Drazin, a leading scientist who for years has been questioning the existence of Democrats, said today that what many have thought to be the Democratic Party may in fact be nothing more than a black hole.

“When [Bush] loses ten or twelve approval points, one would normally expect those approval points to go to the opposition party,” Dr. Drazin said. “But instead, those points have vanished into thin air, leading one to conclude that the so-called Democratic Party does not exist."

Theories about the nonexistence of the Democratic Party are nothing new, said Dr. Drazin, who pointed out that scientists first developed them during the 1988 presidential campaign of then-Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis. 

While the silence of the Democratic Party in recent weeks seems to bolster theories of the party’s nonexistence, she said, there are still some nagging pieces of evidence to the contrary, such as the perpetually outspoken DNC chairman, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean.

“I’ve discussed the Howard Dean phenomenon with my colleagues,” Dr. Drazin said. “And it’s the consensus of the scientific community that there is no logical explanation for Howard Dean.”

(source)

Help Support
Blog for Iowa




Get your
That One
Won! 2008
Button Here!

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Iowa Sites

AFSCME Iowa

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Partnership

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

One Iowa (GLBT)

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media