Bush and 9/11: Is America in Denial?
TvNewsLIES.org

In his two latest books [The 9/11 Commission Report:  Omissions and Distortions and The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11] and during a powerful television presentation [C-Span Book TV May 7, 2005], David Griffin, theologian and 9/11 researcher, put together the most thorough analysis to date of the official Kean commission report on 9/11. Griffin’s examination provides a series of powerful arguments for likely government complicity in the attacks. 

David Ray Griffin is not a crackpot or a conspiracy theorist. He is a theologian with a highly impressive background in religious philosophy who is passionately pursuing the truth about 9/11. He is also a fearless American, concerned that the conclusions of the Kean Commission whitewash much of the conflicting evidence about the attacks that has been unearthed. His appeal is clearly directed at the religious community in this country, whose basic precepts of goodness, decency and truth should loudly demand an open inquiry into the evidence known today. 

Griffin classifies public sentiment of the events of September 11th by breaking it down into 4 classifications. In summary, they are as follows: 

1.  Those who believe that Al Qaeda outsmarted the global intelligence community and surprised the US with the attacks and the Bush administration is responding  accordingly.

2.  Those who believe that Al Qaeda outsmarted the global intelligence community and surprised the US with the attacks and the Bush administration is taking political advantage of the situation.

3.  Those who believe that the Bush administration permitted the attacks to occur in order to take political advantage of the situation.

4.  Those who believe that the Bush administration is complicit in the orchestration of the attacks in order to take political advantage of the situation. 

We feel there is an even more revealing classification. It places the American public in only TWO major groups: 

1.  Those who feel that the Bush administration, at the very least, had the opportunity to stop the attacks, and at the very most, orchestrated them.

2.  Those who refuse to objectively examine or listen to evidence that indicates complicity by the Bush administration. 

We firmly believe that those people who fully believe the conclusions of the Kean Commission have never seen or heard any of the compelling evidence to the contrary.

(Click here to read the entire article)

Click here to sign up for action alerts from  RapidResponse - Iowa