The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Daily Archive

January 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

By Year

Categories

Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  INTELLIGENCE: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret

Intelligence: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret


American Progress

The Pentagon Hides Spy Unit from Congress

The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch for the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According to an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group, called the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection and under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak). Not only does the group operate outside the public view, Rumsfeld has also hidden it from Congress and is not coordinating with the CIA. Already, it has been operating in places like Iraq and Afghanistan – as well as in unnamed "friendly countries" with which the United States is not at war. The group has been working with the elite U.S. Special Forces, such as Delta Force, as well as recruited outside agents, including "notorious figures" whose "links to the U.S. government would be embarrassing if disclosed." The Defense Department has also engaged in legal tricks, redefining the rules to support its claims that the intelligence group is subject to less stringent oversight than similar operations within the CIA. Here's a look inside the Strategic Support Branch:

PLAYING GAMES WITH THE LAW: Defense Department lawyers are hard at work redefining the rules to give Secretary Rumsfeld more expansive powers and to get around any legal constraints. Take Title 10 of the U.S. code, for example. While the Pentagon is legally required to tell Congress about all "deployment orders," Undersecretary for Intelligence Stephen A. Cambone this month issued new guidelines that state the group is allowed to "conduct clandestine HUMINT operations…before publication" of a deployment order, making the subsequent order meaningless. Title 50 got a friendly freshen-up as well: current law says Congress does not have to be informed about "traditional" military activities and their "routine" support, so the Pentagon's general counsel simply expanded the definition of "traditional" and "routine."

RE-READING HERSH: The Post article fits with the article written last week by Seymour Hersh, which detailed the Pentagon's secret plans to go to war in Iran. Hersh wrote, "[Bush] has signed a series of findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as ten nations in the Middle East and South Asia… [Bush]'s decision enables Rumsfeld to run the operations off the books—free from legal restrictions imposed on the C.I.A."

WHO IS WALDROUP? The secret intelligence group is headed up by Col. George Waldroup, a man with little intelligence experience. Waldroup, who likes to refer to himself in the third person as "GW," is not a graduate of the Army's Special Warfare Center nor the CIA's Field Tradecraft Course for intelligence officers. He spent much of his professional life as a "midlevel manager" at the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He was embroiled in scandal in the mid-'90s for deceiving a congressional delegation about staffing problems at Miami International Airport. "Waldroup, then assistant district director for external affairs, helped orchestrate a temporary doubling of immigration screeners on the day of the visit, instructed subordinates not to discuss staff shortages and physically confronted a union leader to prevent him from reaching members of Congress." During the investigation, he then "refused to disclose the password to his e-mail files, refused to sign an affidavit summarizing his testimony and, in a subsequent interview, 'stated that he would not answer any questions' because 'he wished to protect himself from exposure to criminal sanctions.'"

A DANGEROUSLY INEXPERIENCED TEAM: The Strategic Support Branch operatives are sent to work directly with the military's elite Special Operations forces. One big problem: Waldroup's team is staffed with members who lack crucial intelligence experience and training. One military Special Forces officer who worked with the team said one of Waldroup's men actually held his team back like an anchor "because of his physical conditioning and his lack of knowledge of our tactics, techniques and procedures. The guy actually put us in danger." Another Special Forces officer in Afghanistan said Waldroup's men were reluctant to leave the base to do their intel: "These guys can't set up networks and run agents and recruit tribal elders."

SHHHH…DON'T TELL CONGRESS: The Strategic Support Branch operated well below congressional radar. The group was set up using funds siphoned off of other Pentagon projects "without explicit congressional authority or appropriation." The Post reported two "longtime members" of the House Intelligence Committee were unaware of any details surrounding the group. And on CBS's Face The Nation, Sen. John McCain, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called yesterday for hearings to examine the group.

View Article  Help Restore Balance on the Public Airwaves - Bring Back the Fairness Doctrine
Help Restore Balance on the Public Airwaves - Bring Back the Fairness Doctrine

FairnessDoctrine.com

For many years, television and radio stations were required to give equal time to opposing sides of public or political issues to ensure the American public heard all sides of a debate. It was a requirement made by the Federal Communications Commission that came to be known as The Fairness Doctrine.

In 1986, a federal court ruled that the Fairness Doctrine did not have the force of law and could be overturned without congressional approval. Congress passed a bill to make the doctrine law but the bill was vetoed by President Reagan in 1987 and the Fairness Doctrine was abolished.

Since then, the country has experienced a proliferation of highly partisan news outlets that disseminate unbalanced news coverage. Democracy is built on the idea that the views, beliefs, and values of an informed citizenry provide the best basis for political decision-making.

And American listeners and viewers agree. A recent poll of likely voters shows overwhelming support across the political and demographic spectrum for restoring rules requiring fairness and balance on the public airwaves.

Please join us in signing the following petition calling for the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine:

___________

Demand that Congress Renew the Fairness Doctrine

In June 2004, Representative Louise Slaughter (D-NY) introduced legislation calling on broadcasters to provide balance and diversity in their news coverage. H.R. 4710, or the MEDIA Act (Meaningful Expression of Democracy in America) would reinstate the Fairness Doctrine to ensure that broadcasters "afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance." We, the undersigned, support Representative Slaughter's efforts to restore balance to the media and call on Congress to pass this measure.

News consumers, particularly those of talk radio, are overwhelmingly exposed to a single point of view. A survey conducted by Democracy Radio this year revealed that 90% of all broadcast hours on talk radio are fairly characterized as conservative. This imbalance results in issues of public importance receiving little or no attention, while others are presented in a manner not conducive to the listeners' receiving the facts and range of opinions necessary to make informed decisions.

By restoring a diversity of fact and opinion to programming, Fairness Doctrine legislation restores a concept that has been lost since the 1980s -- that because the public owns the airwaves, the public is entitled to be adequately informed by the broadcasters of news and opinion. Slaughter's bill puts this fundamental issue as well as the responsibility of broadcasters back on the agenda: "A broadcast license confers the right to use a valuable public resource and a broadcaster is therefore required to utilize that resource as a trustee for the American people."

We, the undersigned, demand that Congress restore balance to our airwaves.

___________

Click here to sign the petition

Thomas Athans

Executive Director
Democracy Radio

David Brock

President and CEO
Media Matters for America

Andrew Jay Schwartzman

President and CEO
Media Access Project


   Click here to sign up for action alerts from  RapidResponse - Iowa.

Help Support
Blog for Iowa




Get your
That One
Won! 2008
Button Here!

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Iowa Sites

AFSCME Iowa

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Partnership

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

One Iowa (GLBT)

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media