The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Subscribe to Democracyforiowa

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Sunlight Seeker

Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.

Daily Archive

February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29

By Year

Recent Visitors

Sam Garchik - Mon 02 Jun 2008 10:10 AM CDT 
atomburke - Fri 23 May 2008 03:49 PM CDT 
salman - Fri 23 May 2008 06:28 AM CDT 
megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT 
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  Support Post-Election Audits for Iowa this November
Support Post-Election Audits for Iowa this November

By Sean Flaherty, IVI

Dear Friends,

We are close to victory in the fight for paper ballot systems in Iowa, but we need your help on an equally important component of secure elections: random hand audits. Time is short, but there is still active discussion of audits this year.

Please contact Secretary of State Michael Mauro at 515-281-5204 and urge him to support legislation to require hand-count audits of the 2008 election.

Background

Voter-marked paper ballots are the foundation of a reliable voting system. But paper ballots offer security only if we use them to check the software that reads the ballots and tallies our votes.  And the computer voting systems we use in elections have grave vulnerabilities. Don't take our word for it, though. Here is a sample of what software experts say about security and the need for audits:

University of Iowa professor Douglas Jones, one of the world's experts on voting technology, stated in an affidavit in Pennsylvania court this year that hand counted audits are the only defense against weaknessess found by recent security reviews: "..the only effective defenses against the weaknesses discovered by the California TTBR [top-to-bottom review] and the Ohio EVEREST studies is the defense mandated by Pennsylvania law 25 P.S. 3013.7, a recount of a random sample of the ballots cast in an election."* The Ohio and California reviews included all of the voting systems used in Iowa, including paper ballot/optical scan systems.

The Brennan Center's Task Force on Voting System Security wrote in 2006: "The value of paper ballots without the Automatic Routine Audits is highly questionable, " (p. 83).  The Task Force included Professor Jones, Ron Rivest, professor of computer science of MIT and one of the founders of the field of computer security, and Howard Schmidt, former chief security officer of the Microsoft Corporation. When a team that includes Microsoft's security officer says we need hand audits to secure our elections, we should listen.

Secretary Mauro supports post-election audits; it's a matter of getting it done this year. Please be sure to thank him for his support of paper ballot systems, but let him know that an election with no check on the software counting our votes is not an option in 2008.

Thank you for all you do.

Best regards,
Sean Flaherty
Co-Chair, Iowans for Voting Integrity

* “Certification of Douglas W. Jones, Ph.D.” Submitted to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, January 23, 2008.
View Article  Tell Governor Culver: Iowans Deserve Paper Ballots Statewide
Tell Governor Culver: Iowans Deserve Paper Ballots Statewide

By Sean Flaherty, IVI

Great story in the Sunday Register, quoting frequent contribs Flaherty and Depew. Guys, keep up the good work. The rest of us? urge the gov to follow Mauro's lead.

Dear Friends,

Iowa is very close to adopting a statewide paper ballot system in time for the 2008 elections. We need your help to make sure this happens.

Click here to sign Verified Voting's alert urging Governor Culver and legislators to fund paper ballot voting systems, with optical scanners and ballot-marking devices for voters with disabilities. Then please forward this on.

Voter-marked paper ballots provide the most reliable record of the voter's intent.  An article in yesterday's Des Moines Register shows how close we are to this badly needed reform. See here for a summary of reasons that paper ballots are superior to a "paper trail."

Timing is crucial, and we need you to send a message today.  Take one minute to send a message to the Governor and the legislature. Click here to fill out the form, and your message will be sent automatically.

Thank you for all you do!

Best regards,
Sean Flaherty
View Article  Congress -- Stop dawdling!

Congress -- Stop dawdling!


By Common Cause

It's outrageous. We're less than a week away from "Super Tuesday," when 24 states are voting in the first major decision of  the 2008 election, and we still do not have an election process we can trust.

Become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of the Holt bill!

Let's make sure everyone's vote is backed by paper in 2008.
 
The regrettable fact is that what's done is done. Now, we must forge ahead, together, to ensure that Congress does not continue to slip up all the way through the general election.

That's why I'm hoping you'll become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of the Holt bill immediately, to ensure that any mistakes on "Super Tuesday" February 5th, stop at February 5th.

Sign your name to become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of Rep. Holt's bill right now -- before the Super Tuesday deadline!

Despite our strong efforts to get Congress to pass verifiable voting, ensuring all states' voting machines are backed up by a paper record, Congress dilly dallied, and did not pass legislation in time for the Super Tuesday primaries – when hundreds of thousands of Americans will be voting for president.

We have no choice but to go into February 5th without a secure election process in many states. But, we do have a choice when it comes to the general election on November 4th. We can choose to do everything we can to pass the Holt bill (H.R. 5036, the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008) before that election.

The faster you sign on as a co-sponsor, the quicker the bill will be passed, and the sooner the emergency funding will get to the states.  The time to act is right now.

Sign your name to become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of Rep. Holt's bill right now – before the February 5th Super Tuesday deadline! 

Having insecure elections when 24 states go to the polls is inexcusable.  Having insecure elections when all 50 states go to the polls is a recipe for disaster.

Now is the time to stand up to Congress' dawdling and demand that they pass the Holt bill immediately. Will you join us?

Thanks for all you do,

Susannah Goodman
Director of Election Reform, Common Cause

P.S. Keep an eye on your inbox. We'll soon be sending Common Cause's up-to-the-minute report on the threat level of voting machine malfunction in every state across the country to every Citizen Co-Sponsor of the Holt bill. This is one report I can guarantee you will not want to miss.

View Article  Feds HAVA Key to Mauro-Culver Split

Feds HAVA Key to Mauro-Culver Split


By Jerry Depew, Iowa Voters

A new federal bill could resolve the tension between two of Iowa’s top Democrats–the Governor and the Secretary of State. Today’s Register reports that Mauro wants to get all our votes on paper ballots, but Culver is content to buy “paper trails” for the tempermental touchscreens that now infect the state’s polling places.

It’s a question of money (big surprise!). The good stuff that Mauro wants costs $10 million. Culver is content to waste $2 million on the widely cussed paper trail printers.

They should put their egos aside for a minute and agree on one thing: to call on our state’s Congressmen to support the brand new HR 5036. That new bill by New Jersey’s Rush Holt pays for replacement equipment when states wise up and dump their DRE touchscreens. It is not a mandatory bill, so there is only one point of contention: Do we have the money in the federal budget to mop up the mess HAVA made of voting machines all over the nation. States that are loving their mess don’t have to do a thing. States that are ready to wash up can have the soap paid for by the Congress that caused this problem in the first place.

None of Iowa’s Congressmen have signed on to this bill yet. I called Latham’s office in Fort Dodge this morning. Can you do your part?

Boswell in Des Moines (toll free) (888) 432-1984
Braley in Davenport: (563) 323-5988 or more choices
Latham in Ames: 515-232-2885 or tom.latham@mail.house.gov
Loebsack: email or in Cedar Rapids 319-363-2288
King on the web or in Sioux City call 712.224.4692

View Article  Ohio Voting Machine Review Has Major Implications For Iowa
Ohio Voting Machine Review Has Major Implications For Iowa: Critical Security Vulnerabilities, Threats to Voter Privacy

By Iowans for Voting Integrity

Iowa's discussion of purchasing new election equipment is likely to be affected by a landmark review of voting systems in Ohio. A report ordered by the Ohio Secretary of State and released December 14 found severe flaws in all of the voting systems Iowa uses.

“The Ohio review looked at every system Iowa uses, and found real risks to the integrity of elections,” said Iowans for Voting Integrity co-chair Sean Flaherty.  Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said that the security problems discovered were “worse than she anticipated.” [1]

Computer scientists who analyzed the software wrote that within a few weeks, they were able to subvert “every voting system they were provided in ways that would often lead to undetectable manipulation of election results.”  Computer scientists have previously found that malicious code can be written to escape pre-election and post-election testing, running only under desired conditions.[2] The Ohio reviewers warned that it is “safe to assume that motivated attackers will quickly identify – or already have – these and many other issues in the systems.”[3]

Equally troubling was a threat to voter privacy in the design of the TSx touch screen voting machine, made by Diebold/Premier and used in 71 Iowa counties.  Ohio reviewers confirmed reports that the TSx records votes in its computer memory with a time stamp, allowing anyone with access to the system and knowledge of the time of day that a vote was cast to violate voter privacy.[4] Iowa Code 52.7 requires that all voting systems used in the state permit voting “in absolute secrecy.”

 Ohio Secretary Brunner has recommended scrapping all touch screens and using only optically scanned paper ballots. Flaherty said, “Hopefully, these findings will seal the fate of touch screen systems in Iowa”. Legislation signed by Governor Culver in May requires counties eventually to scrap touch screens and adopt a system of optically scanned paper ballots, which are marked by the voter and later tabulated by a machine.  Funding is needed for counties to make switch as quickly as possible. Iowa's legislators,  Governor Culver, and Secretary of State Michael Mauro are discussing funding for new equipment this month.

Paper ballots are the beginning of the solution. Ballot  scanners also use software, so hand-count audits of a sample of ballots to check the electronic tally are necessary.  Audits are championed by many computer scientists who study voting systems, including a task force that included the former chief security officer of Microsoft and University of Iowa voting system expert Douglas Jones.[5] 16 states have laws requiring hand audits of election results.[6]

“The combination of optically scanned paper ballots and hand audits provides checks and balances that build confidence in the system,'' Flaherty said.

[1]    “Ohio Elections Official Calls Machines Flawed.” By Bob Driehaus. New York Times, December 15, 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/
2007/12/15/us/15ohio.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin

[2]    “The Machinery of Democracy: Protecting Elections in an Electronic World.”  Report of the Brennan Center for Justice Task Force on Voting System Security, pages 43-45.  http://brennancenter.org/
dynamic/subpages/download_file_39288.pdf

[3]    EVEREST Academic Review Team Findings, page 4 (page 22 of pdf), http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/info/EVEREST/
14-AcademicFinalEVERESTReport.pdf

[4]    IBID, page 154 (page 172 of pdf)

[5]    “The Machinery of Democracy,” page 3. http://brennancenter.org/dynamic/subpages/
download_file_39288.pdf

[6]    “Manual Audit Requirements.” The Verified Voting Foundation. March 2007, http://www.verifiedvoting.org/downloads/
stateaudits1007.pdf

For More Information Contact Sean Flaherty, Co-Chair
Iowans for Voting Integrity
319-621-8651
sean@iowansforvotingintegrity.org
www.IowansForVotingIntegrity.org

View Article  One More Push for Funding of Paper Ballot Voting System
One More Push for Funding of Paper Ballot Voting System

By Sean Flaherty, IVI

Dear Friends,

We need you to make one more push to place paper ballot voting systems throughout Iowa in time for the 2008 elections.

Please contact Governor Culver 515-281-5211 and urge him to provide full funding for optical scan voting systems, with ballot-marking devices to serve voters with disabilities.

We were concerned a few weeks ago when the Governor called for discussion of adopting a statewide vote by mail system. To our relief, the Governor has indicated that he is not going to push for a statewide vote by mail in lieu of funding for new equipment. But he has also noted that the current budgetary environment is tight, and the Revenue Estimating Conference for next year's budget is December 11. So timing is important.

The new equipment we need for 2008 could cost the state $8 million more; $2 million has already been allocated. With a state budget that exceeds $6 billion a year, a one-time expense of $8 million is not a bad bargain for counting our votes accurately.

Here are some of the most important reasons that optical scan equipment with ballot-marking devices is the best voting system for Iowa:

Iowa deserves reliable voting equipment in 2008 and beyond. The alternative to voter-marked paper ballots with optical scan is to add "paper trail" printers to touch screen voting machines (DREs), which print votes on a continuous roll. These printers have proven unreliable: in Cuyahoga County, Ohio in November 2007, 20% of the paper trail printouts were unreadable. There is a history of problems with paper trail printers.

Voter-marked paper ballots counted by optical scanners at the precinct produced the lowest rate of residual votes of any voting system used in Iowa in 2006.

Paper ballots are much easier for election officials to recount or audit by hand than the continuous paper roll than the direct-recording electronic machines offer for voter verification.


Paper ballots are more intuitive to the voter.


Voters may fail to check the voter-verified paper record. Paper ballots are inherently voter-verified.


In case of a recount, ballots are better for public confidence than a printer roll. A ballot marked by the voter is stronger evidence of the voter's intent than a secondary printout.


With optical scanners and ballot-marking devices, all voters use the same type of ballot, and all votes are counted using the same method. The state could not be accuses of treating voters unequally in the tabulation of votes.


It is easier to protect voter privacy with paper ballot systems, because the DRE paper trail printers store the votes on a continuous roll.


The current generation of DREs has proven vulnerable to calibration problems; e.g., “vote flipping.”

Federal legislation could soon ban the use of thermal paper and reel-to-reel vote rolls for the paper trail printers. Optical scan with accessible ballot-marking devices would meet the requirements of proposed federal legislation.

Tell the Governor that it is time for the state to make a smart investment in democracy. Call him at 515-281-5211, or use the contact information below.

Thank you for all you do.

Best regards,
Sean Flaherty
Co-Chair, Iowans for Voting Integrity
www.IowansForVotingIntegrity.org

Governor Culver's Contact Information

Address:
Office of The Governor and Lt. Governor
State Capitol
Des Moines, IA 50319

E-mail form at:
http://www.governor.iowa.gov/administration/contact/
View Article  Action Alert: Contact Governor Culver to Fund Paper Ballot Voting Systems for 2008
Action Alert: Contact Governor Culver to Fund Paper Ballot Voting Systems for 2008

By IVI

We need your help to get paper ballot voting systems in place throughout Iowa in time for the 2008 elections

Please contact Governor Culver 515-281-5211 and urge him to provide full funding for paper ballots and optical scan equipment.

Last week, the Governor called for discussion of adopting a statewide vote by mail system before the state offers funding for the purchase of new equipment. We commend the Governor for considering alternative ways to move our elections in the direction of paper ballots, but a discussion of vote by mail should not delay the purchase of optical scan equipment in time for 2008. 

First, it is unlikely that the state would implement vote by mail in time for November 2008.  That would leave many counties using electronic voting machines, which even equipped with a "paper trail," are no match for the paper ballot.

Vote by mail also has important disadvantages:

  • States that use regular polling places, and have election-day registration, do better than Iowa or Oregon in voter participation.  Oregon, the only state to adopt vote by mail statewide, does not do much better than Iowa in turnout among citizens who are eligible to vote. Wisconsin and Minnesota, which have regular polling places and offer same-day registration, consistently do better than either Iowa or Oregon. That's good news, because Iowa will have election-day registration in 2008! If we keep on the path we have chosen, there is a good chance that in 2008 we will do better than Oregon.
  • Voter intent is best registered when ballots are scanned at the polling place.  Residual votes, which include intentional skipping of races but also voter mistakes, are higher when ballots are scanned at a central location. At the polling place, the scanner will reject ballots that include overvotes; not so when the scanner is miles away. Oregon had a significantly higher residual vote in the 2004 Presidential election than jurisdictions that used ballot scanners at the polling place (page 17 of the linked pdf).
  • Vote by mail may disadvantage less affluent voters who do move frequently.
The new equipment we need for 2008 could cost the state $8 million more; $2 million has already been allocated. With a state budget that exceeds $6 billion a year, a one-time expense of $8 million is not a bad bargain for counting our votes accurately.

Tell the Governor that it is time for the state to make a smart investment in democracy. Call him at 515-281-5211, or use the contact information below.

Thank you for all you do.

Best regards,
Sean Flaherty
Co-Chair, Iowans for Voting Integrity
www.IowansForVotingIntegrity.org

Governor Culver's Contact Information

Address:
Office of The Governor and Lt. Governor
State Capitol
Des Moines, IA 50319

E-mail form at:
http://www.governor.iowa.gov/administration/contact/

Phone: 515-281-5211
DFIA Events Calendar

Add Your Event Here

Iowa Sites

ABC Free

AFSCME Iowa

Algona Wind Farm

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Cyclones for Choice

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Central

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa Global Warming

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Opinion

Iowa Peace

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Policy Research

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

IOWATER

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media