The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Subscribe to Democracyforiowa

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Sunlight Seeker

Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.

Daily Archive

January 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

By Year

Recent Visitors

Connie Wilson - Sat 23 Aug 2008 06:31 PM CDT 
altheakims - Tue 19 Aug 2008 04:28 AM CDT 
Richard - Sun 17 Aug 2008 06:57 PM CDT 
sspl05 - Sat 02 Aug 2008 07:21 AM CDT 
ihatehogconfinements - Mon 21 Jul 2008 06:45 PM CDT 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  Corporations Biggest Filers of Frivolous Suits
Corporations Biggest Filers of Frivolous Suits

MinutemanMedia.org

by Jim Hightower

Look for a big push by Bush this year to restrict your right to sue corporations that harm or cheat you.

George claims that you unruly citizens are treating big corporations unfairly, constantly filing "frivolous lawsuits" against them. So, to protect the poor corporations, Bush says he must limit your access to America's courts.

But here's a dirty little secret that Bush doesn't mention: By far the biggest filers of frivolous lawsuits are not We the People – but corporations! The consumer group, Public Citizen, has done a survey of cases in Arkansas, Mississippi, Chicago and Philadelphia – four places alleged to be hotbeds of what Bush and his corporate backers like to call "lawsuit abuse" by us little folks.

The cases reveal that, contrary to the propaganda, American businesses file about four times as many lawsuits as do individuals – even though there are 40 times more individuals in America than businesses. Also, the survey finds that corporations and their legal beagles file frivolous lawsuits 69 percent more often than individuals do.

Big companies keep a bevy of attorneys on staff or on retainer, and they routinely unleash them on their customers, competitors, suppliers, workers, and anyone else standing between them and another dollar bill.  

Regular folks, however, count on a system of trial lawyers to help us when we've been wronged. These lawyers pay for all of the up front costs of us going to trial, and they only get paid if we win. This democratic, entrepreneurial system gives poor and middle-class families access to the judicial system – not just the rich.

It's this access that Bush & Company want to take away. Yet, the corporations pushing Bush's hokey "reform" – the very corporations that are so quick to run to the courthouse with frivolous suits – are demanding that they be exempted from the law to shut off access to the system.

To get Public Citizen's report  [Frequent Filers:
Corporate Hypocrisy in Accessing the Courts] and fight for your rights, call
202-454-5104.


Jim Hightower is the best-selling author of Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time To Take It Back, on sale now from Viking Press.  He can also be found at MinutemanMedia.org.


Click here to sign up for action alerts from  RapidResponse - Iowa.



View Article  SUPPORT VIVA 2005: For Voter Verified Paper Ballots
SUPPORT VIVA 2005: For Voter Verified Paper Ballots

From: the National Ballot Integrity Project

Action Alert Day One
January 31, 2005

Voter Verified Paper Ballots are the essential first step towards a trustworthy election. VIVA 2005 makes Voter Verified Paper Ballots mandatory for federal elections.

Senator Ensign (R-NV) will introduce VIVA 2005 if other Republican Senators will cosponsor this worthy bill. Joan Krawitz, Andy Stephensen, Warren Stewart, and Cheryl Lilienstein, of the National Ballot Integrity Project, will be in Washington DC urging Republican Senators to cosponsor VIVA 2005, this Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Please help us by making the phones of Republican Senators ring. Urge them to cosponsor VIVA 2005.

You will be making history again.

Here’s our request:

If you live in a state with a Republican Senator or two, just call them, and ask them to cosponsor VIVA 2005. I would give you the toll free number for the US Capitol Switchboard, but they just disconnected it...I guess this means they got too many calls? So, use your cell phone.

US Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. Monday-Friday 9 AM to 5 PM.

(Ask for Sen. Chuck Grassley)

For more information, legislation text, rationale, and a direct phone line, go here:

http://www.ballotintegrity.org/action.html


And please, forward this request to your lists: VIVA 2005 is the first step in election justice.

With gratitude,

Joan Krawitz
Co-founder, National Ballot Integrity Project
http://www.ballotintegrity.org

View Article  Bush Propaganda Machine Could Roll to a Stop
   Bush Propaganda Machine Could Roll to a Stop

Editor and Publisher

by
Brian Orloff

NEW YORK In response to continued revelations of government-funded "journalism" - ranging from the purported video news releases put out by the drug czar's office and the Department of Health and Human Services, to the recently uncovered payments to columnists Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher, who flacked administration programs - Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) will introduce a bill, The Stop Government Propaganda Act, in the Senate next week.

"It's time for Congress to shut down the Administration's propaganda mill," Lautenberg said in a statement.  The bill is co-sponsored by Sens. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Jon Corzine (D-N.J.).

[Lautenberg’s spokesman] said "This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. This is an issue about an independent press, and I think that's something that will cross party lines."

"[Bush] said that his cabinet agencies made a mistake when they paid commentators to promote his agenda," Kennedy said in a statement. "It's more than just a mistake, it's an abuse of taxpayer funds and an abuse of the First Amendment and freedom of the press. ... If [Bush] is serious about stopping these abuses, he will support this legislation."


(click here to read the entire story)


Click here to sign up for action alerts from  RapidResponse - Iowa.


View Article  Human Rights Watch Condemns U.S. Meatpackers
 Human Rights Watch Condemns U.S. Meatpackers


This week brought a new first:  Human Rights Watch - an international human rights watchdog agency - accused a specific U.S. industry of violating basic human rights.

In a summary from the New York Times:



For the first time, Human Rights Watch has issued a report that harshly criticizes a single industry in the United States, concluding that working conditions among the nation's meatpackers and slaughterhouses are so bad that they violate basic human rights.
...

"Meatpacking is the most dangerous factory job in America," said the report's author, Lance Compa, who teaches industrial and labor relations at Cornell and is a former union organizer and negotiator. "Dangerous conditions are cheaper for companies, and the government does next to nothing."

Responding to that criticism, Richard Fairfax, director of enforcement for the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said the agency vigorously oversaw the industry for excessive line speed and other problems.

 "We have a strong enforcement program" in meatpacking, Mr. Fairfax said, "and a strong compliance assistance program."

....

 "Nearly every worker interviewed for this report bore physical signs of a serious injury suffered from working in a meat or poultry plant," the report says. "Meat and poultry industry employers set up the workplaces and practices that create these dangers, but they treat the resulting mayhem as a normal, natural part of the production process, not as what it is - repeated violations of international human rights standards."

The report also says that to save themselves money, companies frequently pressure injured employees not to file workers' compensation claims.


Something to keep in mind - "repeated violations of international human rights standards" is describing the process used to bring the majority of meat products to your dinner plate.  Meat packing has also been a traditional Iowa industry - and many towns can tell you of their experiences with meatpacking companies bent on paying the lowest wage and ensuring the worst conditions possible just to boost profit margins.


View Article  SENATOR TOM HARKIN ON THE SENATE CONFIRMATION OF CONDOLEEZZA RICE TO SECRETARY OF STATE
 SENATOR TOM HARKIN ON THE SENATE CONFIRMATION OF  CONDOLEEZZA RICE TO SECRETARY OF STATE


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2005

“After much consideration of Dr. Condoleezza Rice’s nomination to be Secretary of State, I am unable to support her nomination.

I am very concerned about Dr. Rice’s role as the marketer of the inflated evidence leading up to what was called a pre-emptive war in Iraq. The Administration gave the impression to the American people that Iraq posed an imminent threat to the US and the world, often based on worst case scenarios and poor intelligence, which later proved to be untrue.

I have experienced first hand in my travels the loss of U.S. credibility worldwide which alienated many of our democratic friends and allies. Dr. Rice’s elevation to Secretary of State will send the wrong signal regarding our future diplomacy efforts and American interests.”

(Source)


View Article  Chile's Social Security Phase-Out Experience
 Chile's Social Security Phase-Out Experience


In the "talking points" that the GOP puts out about Social Security, one of the big examples they cite is the "success" that Chile has experience in privatizing their Social Security system.

Today, the New York Times takes a look at this so-called success.



 "What we have is a system that is good for Chile but bad for most Chileans," said a government official who specializes in pension issues and who spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing retaliation from corporate interests. "If people really had freedom of choice, 90 percent of them would opt to go back to the old system."

...

For those remaining in the government's original pay-as-you-go system, the maximum retirement benefit is now about $1,250 a month. The National Center for Alternative Development Studies, a research institute here, calculates that to get that same amount from a private pension fund, workers would have to contribute more than $250,000 over their careers, a target that has been reached by fewer than 500 of the private system's 7 million past and present contributors.


 This leaves many Chileans in a situation that has led to the coining of a phrase: "pension damage." There is now even an Association of People With Pension Damage, 157,000 members and growing, that consists of Chileans, mostly former government employees, who find that their pensions, based on contributions to the private system, are significantly less than if they had remained in the old system.

 "They come to us in desperation," said Yasmir Fariña, the group's president, "because those who stayed in the government system are often retiring with monthly pensions twice as large as everyone else's."



The article does discuss the investment capital that has resulted in capital investments in the Chilean economy, but overall the system has not benefited the population as a whole.

Something else to consider:  Chile's old system was being systematically looted by the corrupt Pinochet dictatorship - outside of snarky comments, is this administration seriously looking to the Pinochet government for inspiration?

Take a look at other experiences - namely the Thatcher-lead UK privatization schemes - in an earlier post.



UPDATE:   Another phase-out proponent tool, the Cato "Social Security Calculator" is a crock
.
View Article  INTELLIGENCE: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret

Intelligence: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret


American Progress

The Pentagon Hides Spy Unit from Congress

The Pentagon has secretly been operating a clandestine espionage branch for the past two years after reinterpreting U.S. law to place more power directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. According to an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington Post, the group, called the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate without detection and under the defense secretary's direct control" in collecting human intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak). Not only does the group operate outside the public view, Rumsfeld has also hidden it from Congress and is not coordinating with the CIA. Already, it has been operating in places like Iraq and Afghanistan – as well as in unnamed "friendly countries" with which the United States is not at war. The group has been working with the elite U.S. Special Forces, such as Delta Force, as well as recruited outside agents, including "notorious figures" whose "links to the U.S. government would be embarrassing if disclosed." The Defense Department has also engaged in legal tricks, redefining the rules to support its claims that the intelligence group is subject to less stringent oversight than similar operations within the CIA. Here's a look inside the Strategic Support Branch:

PLAYING GAMES WITH THE LAW: Defense Department lawyers are hard at work redefining the rules to give Secretary Rumsfeld more expansive powers and to get around any legal constraints. Take Title 10 of the U.S. code, for example. While the Pentagon is legally required to tell Congress about all "deployment orders," Undersecretary for Intelligence Stephen A. Cambone this month issued new guidelines that state the group is allowed to "conduct clandestine HUMINT operations…before publication" of a deployment order, making the subsequent order meaningless. Title 50 got a friendly freshen-up as well: current law says Congress does not have to be informed about "traditional" military activities and their "routine" support, so the Pentagon's general counsel simply expanded the definition of "traditional" and "routine."

RE-READING HERSH: The Post article fits with the article written last week by Seymour Hersh, which detailed the Pentagon's secret plans to go to war in Iran. Hersh wrote, "[Bush] has signed a series of findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as ten nations in the Middle East and South Asia… [Bush]'s decision enables Rumsfeld to run the operations off the books—free from legal restrictions imposed on the C.I.A."

WHO IS WALDROUP? The secret intelligence group is headed up by Col. George Waldroup, a man with little intelligence experience. Waldroup, who likes to refer to himself in the third person as "GW," is not a graduate of the Army's Special Warfare Center nor the CIA's Field Tradecraft Course for intelligence officers. He spent much of his professional life as a "midlevel manager" at the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He was embroiled in scandal in the mid-'90s for deceiving a congressional delegation about staffing problems at Miami International Airport. "Waldroup, then assistant district director for external affairs, helped orchestrate a temporary doubling of immigration screeners on the day of the visit, instructed subordinates not to discuss staff shortages and physically confronted a union leader to prevent him from reaching members of Congress." During the investigation, he then "refused to disclose the password to his e-mail files, refused to sign an affidavit summarizing his testimony and, in a subsequent interview, 'stated that he would not answer any questions' because 'he wished to protect himself from exposure to criminal sanctions.'"

A DANGEROUSLY INEXPERIENCED TEAM: The Strategic Support Branch operatives are sent to work directly with the military's elite Special Operations forces. One big problem: Waldroup's team is staffed with members who lack crucial intelligence experience and training. One military Special Forces officer who worked with the team said one of Waldroup's men actually held his team back like an anchor "because of his physical conditioning and his lack of knowledge of our tactics, techniques and procedures. The guy actually put us in danger." Another Special Forces officer in Afghanistan said Waldroup's men were reluctant to leave the base to do their intel: "These guys can't set up networks and run agents and recruit tribal elders."

SHHHH…DON'T TELL CONGRESS: The Strategic Support Branch operated well below congressional radar. The group was set up using funds siphoned off of other Pentagon projects "without explicit congressional authority or appropriation." The Post reported two "longtime members" of the House Intelligence Committee were unaware of any details surrounding the group. And on CBS's Face The Nation, Sen. John McCain, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called yesterday for hearings to examine the group.

DFIA Events Calendar

Add Your Event Here

Iowa Sites

ABC Free

AFSCME Iowa

Algona Wind Farm

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Cyclones for Choice

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Central

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa Global Warming

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Opinion

Iowa Peace

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Policy Research

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

IOWATER

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media