Sunlight Seeker
Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.
Media Campaign Tools
The Democratic Agenda
*Tips & Talking Points for Letters to Editors
Email The Media
*Email Iowa and national media, five at a time
Framing The Message
*UC Berkeley professor George Lakoff tells how conservatives use language to dominate politics
Simple Framing
*A step-by-step guide on how to frame progressive issues, by George Lakoff
DemSpeak
*Values Inventory, Message Identification and Development, Engagement & Rapport Strategies, Framing and Reframing Language, Strategic Development and Deployment of Frames, Mediaspace Injection Choreography, and Framing/Media Crossfire training of Capitol Hill Legislators, new TV spokespersons for progressives, Talk Radio callers, and Progressive Leaders
| January 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
Connie Wilson - Sat 23 Aug 2008 06:31 PM CDT
altheakims - Tue 19 Aug 2008 04:28 AM CDT
Richard - Sun 17 Aug 2008 06:57 PM CDT
sspl05 - Sat 02 Aug 2008 07:21 AM CDT
ihatehogconfinements - Mon 21 Jul 2008 06:45 PM CDT
|
Monday, January 31

Corporations Biggest Filers of Frivolous Suits
by
Trish Nelson
on Mon 31 Jan 2005 10:48 AM CST
Corporations Biggest Filers of Frivolous Suits
MinutemanMedia.org
by Jim Hightower
Look for a big push by Bush this year to restrict your right to sue corporations that harm or cheat you.
George
claims that you unruly citizens are treating big corporations unfairly,
constantly filing "frivolous lawsuits" against them. So, to protect the
poor corporations, Bush says he must limit your access to America's
courts.
But
here's a dirty little secret that Bush doesn't mention: By far the
biggest filers of frivolous lawsuits are not We the People – but
corporations! The consumer group, Public Citizen, has done a survey of
cases in Arkansas, Mississippi, Chicago and Philadelphia – four places
alleged to be hotbeds of what Bush and his corporate backers like to
call "lawsuit abuse" by us little folks.
The
cases reveal that, contrary to the propaganda, American businesses file
about four times as many lawsuits as do individuals – even though there
are 40 times more individuals in America than businesses. Also, the
survey finds that corporations and their legal beagles file frivolous
lawsuits 69 percent more often than individuals do.
Big
companies keep a bevy of attorneys on staff or on retainer, and they
routinely unleash them on their customers, competitors, suppliers,
workers, and anyone else standing between them and another dollar bill.
Regular
folks, however, count on a system of trial lawyers to help us when
we've been wronged. These lawyers pay for all of the up front costs of
us going to trial, and they only get paid if we win. This democratic,
entrepreneurial system gives poor and middle-class families access to
the judicial system – not just the rich.
It's
this access that Bush & Company want to take away. Yet, the
corporations pushing Bush's hokey "reform" – the very corporations that
are so quick to run to the courthouse with frivolous suits – are
demanding that they be exempted from the law to shut off access to the
system.
To get Public Citizen's report [Frequent Filers:
Corporate Hypocrisy in Accessing the Courts] and fight for your rights, call 202-454-5104.
Jim
Hightower is the best-selling author of Thieves In High Places:
They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time To Take It Back, on sale now
from Viking Press. He can also be found at MinutemanMedia.org.
Click here to sign up for action alerts
from RapidResponse - Iowa.

SUPPORT VIVA 2005: For Voter Verified Paper Ballots
by
Linda Thieman
on Mon 31 Jan 2005 05:46 AM CST
SUPPORT VIVA 2005: For Voter Verified Paper Ballots
From: the National Ballot Integrity Project
Action Alert Day One
January 31, 2005
Voter Verified Paper Ballots
are the essential first step towards a trustworthy election. VIVA 2005
makes Voter Verified Paper Ballots mandatory for federal elections.
Senator Ensign (R-NV)
will introduce VIVA 2005 if other Republican Senators will cosponsor
this worthy bill. Joan Krawitz, Andy Stephensen, Warren Stewart, and
Cheryl Lilienstein, of the National Ballot Integrity Project, will be
in Washington DC urging Republican Senators to cosponsor VIVA 2005,
this Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Please help us by making the phones of Republican Senators ring. Urge them to cosponsor VIVA 2005.
You will be making history again.
Here’s our request:
If you
live in a state with a Republican Senator or two, just call them, and
ask them to cosponsor VIVA 2005. I would give you the toll free number
for the US Capitol Switchboard, but they just disconnected it...I guess
this means they got too many calls? So, use your cell phone.
US Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. Monday-Friday 9 AM to 5 PM.
(Ask for Sen. Chuck Grassley)
For more information, legislation text, rationale, and a direct phone line, go here:
http://www.ballotintegrity.org/action.html
And please, forward this request to your lists: VIVA 2005 is the first step in election justice.
With gratitude,
Joan Krawitz
Co-founder, National Ballot Integrity Project
http://www.ballotintegrity.org
Saturday, January 29

Bush Propaganda Machine Could Roll to a Stop
by
Trish Nelson
on Sat 29 Jan 2005 10:53 AM CST
Bush Propaganda Machine Could Roll to a Stop
Editor and Publisher
by Brian Orloff
NEW YORK
In response to continued revelations of government-funded "journalism"
- ranging from the purported video news releases put out by the drug
czar's office and the Department of Health and Human Services, to the recently uncovered payments to columnists Armstrong
Williams and Maggie Gallagher, who flacked administration programs -
Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) will
introduce a bill, The Stop Government Propaganda Act, in the Senate
next week.
"It's
time for Congress to shut down the Administration's propaganda mill,"
Lautenberg said in a statement. The bill is co-sponsored by Sens.
Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Jon Corzine (D-N.J.).
[Lautenberg’s
spokesman] said "This is not a Republican or Democratic issue.
This is an issue about an independent press, and I think that's
something that will cross party lines."
"[Bush] said that his cabinet agencies made a mistake when they paid
commentators to promote his agenda," Kennedy said in a statement. "It's
more than just a mistake, it's an abuse of taxpayer funds and an abuse
of the First Amendment and freedom of the press. ... If [Bush]
is serious about stopping these abuses, he will support this
legislation."
(click here to read the entire story)
Click here to sign up for action alerts
from RapidResponse - Iowa.
Friday, January 28

Human Rights Watch Condemns U.S. Meatpackers
by
Chad Thompson
on Fri 28 Jan 2005 12:31 PM CST
Human Rights Watch Condemns U.S. Meatpackers
This
week brought a new first: Human Rights Watch - an international
human rights watchdog agency - accused a specific U.S. industry of
violating basic human rights.
In a summary from the New York Times:
For
the first time, Human Rights Watch has issued a report that harshly
criticizes a single industry in the United States, concluding that
working conditions among the nation's meatpackers and slaughterhouses
are so bad that they violate basic human rights.
...
"Meatpacking
is the most dangerous factory job in America," said the report's
author, Lance Compa, who teaches industrial and labor relations at
Cornell and is a former union organizer and negotiator. "Dangerous conditions are cheaper for companies, and the government does next to nothing."
Responding
to that criticism, Richard Fairfax, director of enforcement for the
federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said the agency
vigorously oversaw the industry for excessive line speed and other
problems.
"We have a strong enforcement program" in meatpacking, Mr. Fairfax said, "and a strong compliance assistance program."
....
"Nearly every worker interviewed for this report bore physical
signs of a serious injury suffered from working in a meat or poultry
plant," the report says. "Meat and poultry industry employers set up
the workplaces and practices that create these dangers, but they treat
the resulting mayhem as a normal, natural part of the production
process, not as what it is - repeated violations of international human
rights standards."
The report also says that to save themselves money, companies
frequently pressure injured employees not to file workers' compensation
claims.
Something
to keep in mind - "repeated violations of international human rights
standards" is describing the process used to bring the majority of meat
products to your dinner plate. Meat packing has also been a
traditional Iowa industry - and many towns can tell you of their
experiences with meatpacking companies bent on paying the lowest wage
and ensuring the worst conditions possible just to boost profit margins.
Thursday, January 27

SENATOR TOM HARKIN ON THE SENATE CONFIRMATION OF CONDOLEEZZA RICE TO SECRETARY OF STATE
by
Linda Thieman
on Thu 27 Jan 2005 04:26 PM CST
SENATOR TOM HARKIN ON THE SENATE CONFIRMATION OF CONDOLEEZZA RICE TO SECRETARY OF STATE
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2005
“After much consideration of Dr. Condoleezza Rice’s nomination to be Secretary of State, I am unable to support her nomination.
I am
very concerned about Dr. Rice’s role as the marketer of the inflated
evidence leading up to what was called a pre-emptive war in Iraq. The
Administration gave the impression to the American people that Iraq
posed an imminent threat to the US and the world, often based on worst
case scenarios and poor intelligence, which later proved to be untrue.
I have
experienced first hand in my travels the loss of U.S. credibility
worldwide which alienated many of our democratic friends and allies.
Dr. Rice’s elevation to Secretary of State will send the wrong signal
regarding our future diplomacy efforts and American interests.”
(Source)

Chile's Social Security Phase-Out Experience
by
Chad Thompson
on Thu 27 Jan 2005 01:21 PM CST
Chile's Social Security Phase-Out Experience
In the
"talking points" that the GOP puts out about Social Security, one of
the big examples they cite is the "success" that Chile has experience
in privatizing their Social Security system.
Today, the New York Times takes a look at this so-called success.
"What we have is a system that is good for Chile but bad for most
Chileans," said a government official who specializes in pension issues
and who spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing retaliation from
corporate interests. "If people really had freedom of choice, 90
percent of them would opt to go back to the old system."
...
For those remaining in the government's original pay-as-you-go system,
the maximum retirement benefit is now about $1,250 a month. The
National Center for Alternative Development Studies, a research
institute here, calculates that to get that same amount from a private
pension fund, workers would have to contribute more than $250,000 over
their careers, a target that has been reached by fewer than 500 of the
private system's 7 million past and present contributors.
This
leaves many Chileans in a situation that has led to the coining of a
phrase: "pension damage." There is now even an Association of People
With Pension Damage, 157,000 members and growing, that consists of
Chileans, mostly former government employees, who find that their
pensions, based on contributions to the private system, are
significantly less than if they had remained in the old system.
"They
come to us in desperation," said Yasmir Fariña, the group's president,
"because those who stayed in the government system are often retiring
with monthly pensions twice as large as everyone else's."
The
article does discuss the investment capital that has resulted in
capital investments in the Chilean economy, but overall the system has
not benefited the population as a whole.
Something
else to consider: Chile's old system was being systematically
looted by the corrupt Pinochet dictatorship - outside of snarky
comments, is this administration seriously looking to the Pinochet government for inspiration?
Take a look at other experiences - namely the Thatcher-lead UK privatization schemes - in an earlier post.
UPDATE: Another phase-out proponent tool, the Cato "Social Security Calculator" is a crock.
Monday, January 24

INTELLIGENCE: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little Secret
by
Linda Thieman
on Mon 24 Jan 2005 09:41 PM CST
Intelligence: Rumsfeld's Dirty Little
Secret
American Progress
The Pentagon Hides Spy Unit from Congress
The Pentagon has secretly
been operating a
clandestine espionage branch for the past two years after reinterpreting
U.S. law to place more power directly in the hands of Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld. According to an explosive new article in yesterday's Washington
Post, the group, called the Strategic Support Branch, is "designed to operate
without detection and under the defense secretary's direct control" in
collecting human intelligence (or HUMINT, in intelligence-speak). Not only does
the group operate outside the public view, Rumsfeld has also hidden it from
Congress and is not coordinating with the CIA. Already, it has been operating in
places like Iraq and Afghanistan – as well as in unnamed "friendly countries"
with which the United States is not at war. The group has been working with the
elite U.S. Special Forces, such as Delta Force, as well as recruited outside
agents, including "notorious figures" whose "links to the U.S. government would
be embarrassing if disclosed." The Defense Department has also engaged in legal
tricks, redefining the rules to support its claims that the intelligence group
is subject to less stringent oversight than similar operations within the CIA.
Here's a look inside the Strategic Support Branch:
PLAYING GAMES WITH THE
LAW: Defense Department lawyers are hard at work redefining the rules to
give Secretary Rumsfeld more expansive powers and to get around any legal
constraints. Take Title
10 of the U.S. code, for example. While the Pentagon is legally required to
tell Congress about all "deployment orders," Undersecretary for Intelligence
Stephen A. Cambone this month issued new guidelines that state the group is
allowed to "conduct clandestine HUMINT operations…before publication" of a
deployment order, making the subsequent order meaningless. Title
50 got a friendly freshen-up as well: current law says Congress does not
have to be informed about "traditional" military activities and their "routine"
support, so the Pentagon's general counsel simply expanded the definition of
"traditional" and "routine."
RE-READING HERSH:
The Post article fits with the article written last week by Seymour
Hersh, which detailed the Pentagon's secret plans to go to war in Iran.
Hersh wrote, "[Bush] has signed a series of findings and executive
orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces
units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets
in as many as ten nations in the Middle East and South Asia… [Bush]'s
decision enables Rumsfeld to run the operations off the books—free from legal
restrictions imposed on the C.I.A."
WHO IS WALDROUP? The
secret intelligence group is headed up by Col. George Waldroup, a man with
little intelligence experience. Waldroup, who likes to refer to himself in the
third person as "GW," is not a graduate of the Army's Special Warfare Center nor
the CIA's Field Tradecraft Course for intelligence officers. He spent much of
his professional life as a "midlevel manager" at the Immigration and
Naturalization Service. He was embroiled
in scandal in the mid-'90s for deceiving a congressional delegation about
staffing problems at Miami International Airport. "Waldroup, then assistant
district director for external affairs, helped orchestrate a temporary doubling
of immigration screeners on the day of the visit, instructed subordinates not to
discuss staff shortages and physically confronted a union leader to prevent him
from reaching members of Congress." During the investigation, he then "refused
to disclose the password to his e-mail files, refused to sign an affidavit
summarizing his testimony and, in a subsequent interview, 'stated that he would
not answer any questions' because 'he wished to protect himself from exposure to
criminal sanctions.'"
A DANGEROUSLY
INEXPERIENCED TEAM: The Strategic Support Branch operatives are sent to work
directly with the military's elite Special Operations forces. One big problem:
Waldroup's team is staffed with members who lack crucial intelligence experience
and training. One military Special Forces officer who worked with the team said
one of Waldroup's men actually held his team back like an anchor "because of his
physical conditioning and his lack of knowledge of our tactics, techniques and
procedures. The guy actually put
us in danger." Another Special Forces officer in Afghanistan said Waldroup's
men were reluctant to leave the base to do their intel: "These guys can't set up
networks and run agents and recruit tribal elders."
SHHHH…DON'T TELL
CONGRESS: The Strategic Support Branch operated well below congressional
radar. The group was set up using funds siphoned off of other Pentagon projects
"without
explicit congressional authority or appropriation." The Post reported two
"longtime members" of the House Intelligence Committee were unaware of any
details surrounding the group. And on CBS's Face The Nation, Sen. John McCain, a
member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called
yesterday for hearings to examine the group.
|
DFIA Events Calendar
Add Your Event Here
|