|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recent Articles
Search
Login Daily Archive
By Month |
Wednesday, March 7
by
Sam Garchik
on Wed 07 Mar 2007 09:33 AM CST
Cable Franchise Meeting in Des Moines
By Stevie Converse Join us at our forum Saturday March 10 at the Clive City Hall from 10 a.m. to noon. Proposed Bill Would Eliminate Cable Franchise Fees Des Moines Register March 6, 2007 By Rep. Libby Jacobs As a member of the House Commerce Committee, I have the opportunity to consider legislation that provides regulation for certain aspects of the business community. One such issue is cable franchise law, and it appears this issue will face us again during this session. Reforming the way Americans get their cable has been a long-discussed idea. Across the nation, states have moved to provide more competition as technology grants different industries the ability to distribute video programming. Going into 2007, 11 states had already approved some form of cable franchise reform legislation. Those states are Arizona, California, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. This issue had been considered by Congress last year, with the House overwhelmingly approving a bill to create a national franchising structure. So what does the proposed Iowa bill do? Under current Iowa law, Iowa Code section 364.2, each city has the authority to grant a franchise for cable television service. The proposed bill would dramatically change this process. The bill would require a person or company providing cable service or video service to apply to the state or a municipality for a "certificate of franchise authority" to provide cable in a specified service area. Companies already providing cable under a franchise agreement entered into prior to July 1, 2007, are not required to apply for a certificate of franchise authority until the agreement expires or is terminated. When a company applies for a certificate of franchise agreement under the new arrangement, they would have to comply with a number of requirements. These requirements include: -Describing the area that the company plans on providing service to -Agreeing to comply with federal requirements for cable service -Agreeing to comply with local right of way ordinances and -The address of the principal place of business In what might be the most controversial aspect of the bill, the new law would put strict limits on the power of cities over holders of the certificates. Code section 364.2 relating to the powers of cities to grant franchises, would not apply to a holder of a certificate of franchise authority under the bill. Cities also would no longer be able to get certain conditions inserted into the franchise agreements. Among the things cities would no longer be able to require of a holder of the certificate are: - Mandatory build-out provisions - Requiring the company to be granted a separate franchise from the city - Paying fees that are not permitted under the bill and - Requiring other conditions not mentioned in the bill If a cable-service provider receives a certificate of franchise authority and chooses to enter into a market, they would be required to give that city 30 days notice of their intentions. If a company enters into a market where there is an existing franchise, the company holding the franchise would have the opportunity to renegotiate the agreement with the city so that both companies are operating under similar conditions. Proponents of the bill will state that the main focus of this effort is to provide competition and reduce the cost to the consumer. According to their data, the national rate of inflation has increased 12 percent since 2002 and median family income has risen 11 percent in the same time period. Cable rates in Iowa for this time frame have risen by 36 percent. I would expect cable providers in the state will put up strong opposition to the bill. Cities, which fear the loss of revenue from franchise fees and the loss of control over the service in their cities, will also have issues. One of their main concerns will be the build-out of services to underserved areas. Since this bill has ramifications for consumers I expect quite a bit of debate on this topic. Join us at our forum Saturday March 10 at the Clive City Hall from 10 a.m. to noon. |
Blog for Iowa
BFIA Writer's Guidelines We welcome Submissions Iowa Sites Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa Genetic Engineering Action Network Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility Iowa Public Interest Research Group Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates Progressive Action for the Common Good Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT) Iowa Blogs The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities) Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog) Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections Political FalloutFight Iowa Rapid Response Network - Iowa
Iowans for Better Local TV
Air America
The Counterpoint
National FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Media Matters for America
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||