The Hypocrisy of the Mason City Globe Gazette


by John Drury

The following is an editorial published in the Mason City Globe Gazette on December 5, 2004. I found it hypocritical of the Globe to all of a sudden have an interest in education after completely ignoring the subject in the recent election and blindly endorsing the entire incumbent Republican ticket. And of course, I had to respond and that follows as well. -John Drury


Iowa must find a way to raise teachers' pay

Young Iowans who hear all the talk about the state's commitment to education may wonder if they're hearing things correctly.

That's because the words and deeds don't match, and haven't for too long. Indeed, Iowans long have prided ourselves on offering high-quality education and have committed ourselves to keeping that quality high.

But dwindling state funding has cast an ever-growing shadow over the public education system. We've heard too many reports of programs being cut or eliminated, not to mention school closings.

Thankfully, parents and concerned residents have accepted the challenge to keep some programs alive and part of a well-rounded education through fund-raisers and other activities.

But here's a problem that waffle dinners and bake sales can't touch. Iowa's teacher pay has slipped four spots since last year and now ranks 38th nationally.

A survey by the National Education Association showed Iowa teachers averaged $39,432 last year — more than $7,000 below the national average of $46,726. Our teachers drawing that kind of salary had an average of 15 years of service.

Iowa also dropped two places, to 38th, in the amount of per-pupil spending. That averaged $7,098 last year, 1.8 percent more than the previous year but not enough to keep pace with many other states.

It goes to show that talk's cheap — we talk about a commitment to quality education, but our state leaders don't back it up like they should.

Now, some will point to the 4 percent increase in school funding approved in the last legislative session. But most education groups wanted 6 percent, and will continue to work for that.

That's because by the time that 4 percent is divided among rising health insurance, utility and transportation costs, just to name a few areas, the funds remaining for teacher salaries may be negligible, according to Mason City Superintendent Keith Sersland.

It's time for the Legislature to put an end to the talk and start finding ways to pump up the education funding. We need to attract and keep the brightest minds and stop the raiding of our best educators by nearby states such as Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Many argue that Iowa's quality of life should be a factor in drawing good educators, and it is for those of us who hold the Hawkeye state near and dear. But other states offer a quality lifestyle as well, and more money to enjoy it.

No one says it's going to be easy to find the money to make this all happen. Demand for more cash runs up and down the legislative to-do list, from economic development to social services, and each area has valid arguments.

But to make improvements in those other areas, it seems logical that we have to start by educating our young people in the best way possible, and we need quality teachers to do that. To keep those quality teachers, we must pay them well.

To let Iowa's rank in teacher pay keep slipping is embarrassing and inexcusable. Education has long been an Iowa point of pride, and it's a point the Legislature must address as soon as the gavel falls on the next session.

Agree? Disagree? Send your letter to the editor to the Editor's Mailbag at news@globegazette. com or by regular mail to Editor's Mailbag, Globe Gazette, P.O. Box 271, Mason City, IA 50402-0271.


December 5, 2004

Editor's Mailbag
Globe Gazette
P.O. Box 271
Mason City, IA 50402

Dear Editor:

I find the Globe Gazette’s December 5, 2004 “Iowa must find a way to raise teachers’ pay” editorial very interesting.

In the editorial you mention an updated report released by the National Education Association showing that Iowa has dropped four points to 38th in the nation when it comes to teacher pay and dropped two points to 38th in the nation in per pupil spending. A preliminary report showing similar numbers was released last spring. On teacher pay, you point out that we are more than $7,000 below the national average. On per pupil spending, we had a 1.8 percent increase over last year, but we are not keeping up with the pace of other states.

You point out that the “words and deeds ‘of the current legislature’ don’t match, and haven’t for too long.” You correctly criticize the current legislature by saying that “talk is cheap, we talk about a commitment to quality education, but our state leaders don’t back it up like they should.” You are correct in saying that this is “embarrassing and inexcusable.” You are also correct in stating that the solution is for “the legislature to put an end to the talk and start finding ways to pump up the education funding.”

My questions are simple. If the answer to this problem is a shift in priorities of the Iowa legislature, why didn’t you take this strong position before the recent election, and why did you blindly endorse the slate of incumbent legislators that have allowed this to happen?

If you truly cared about the education of Iowa’s children, you would show some responsibility in your reporting. Quite frankly, your pretending to care attitude is also embarrassing and inexcusable.

Signed,
John Drury