Democracy Now! Discusses Vilsack Nomination for Agriculture Secretary DemocracyNow.org
A courageous journalist and champion of media reform, Amy Goodman is not the least bit shy about reporting on stolen elections, military contractors or mysterious plane crashes. Today's topic is slightly less exotic but as usual, Amy and Juan Gonzales have done their homework.
If you don't have DN where you live but would like to, there is a page at their website devoted to helping communities add DN to their local stations. Often, stations add programming to their schedules simply in response to requests from the community, so call and get your friends to call your local TV or radio stations. DemocracyNow! is an incredible resource for truth.
JUAN GONZALEZ: As Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack will manage a staff of more than 105,000 and a budget of more than $95 billion.
From 1999 to 2007, Vilsack served as the Democratic governor of Iowa. After a brief run for the presidency in 2007, he worked as an attorney for a corporate law firm that has represented food giants Cargill and ConAgra. He is a strong backer of biofuels and genetically engineered crops. In 2001, the Biotechnology Industry Organization named Vilsack Governor of the Year. On the issue of farm subsidies, he has supported reducing government subsidies of factory farms.
This is part of what Tom Vilsack said on Wednesday after being nominated to be Agriculture Secretary.
TOM VILSACK: As a small-town lawyer, I had the responsibility of helping farm families during tough economic times. I know these people. America’s farmers and ranchers deserve a Secretary of Agriculture that respects them for the contribution they make to all of us every day. I hope to be that secretary. I look forward to working with congressional leaders who share the President-elect’s vision of bringing hope to rural America, of being good stewards of our natural resources, of providing American leadership on climate change, and making America a nation truly dedicated to health and nutrition.
AMY GOODMAN: Brian Moore, let’s begin with you. What do you think of Governor Vilsack as the pick for Secretary of Agriculture? BRIAN MOORE: We’re encouraged by the pick of Governor Vilsack, and for various reasons. First of all, we believe it’s someone we can work with. This governor, as governor and as a presidential candidate, has said he would like to reduce global warming emissions by 70 percent by 2050, a nice environmental position, conservation position on reducing global warming gases. He’s also been a supporter of changing the large subsidy scale, large subsidy system, within the Department of Agriculture and, in fact, moving some of that money to the natural resources conservation programs that they run.
JUAN GONZALEZ: … do you have any concern about his close relationship with some of these huge agribusiness companies? For instance, he’s been known to fly on Monsanto jets on more than one occasion.
BRIAN MOORE: Well, it’s an interesting question… I understand agriculture, while agribusiness is something different. And I believe it’s important to have a Secretary of Agriculture that understands the agriculture system in the United States, and agribusiness is part of that. So the assumption that the nominee for the Secretary of Agriculture is in bed with these people, I’m not sure about it. My assumption is that this is someone from a farm state who understands agriculture and, more importantly for me, understands conservation, understands the need to reduce greenhouse gases.
AMY GOODMAN: Ronnie Cummins, while the Audubon Society is applauding the choice of Governor Vilsack as Agriculture Secretary, he still has to go through the confirmation process in the Senate. What are your plans?
RONNIE CUMMINS: We’ve started an online campaign at stopvilsack.org. We need to send a message from hundreds of thousands of organic consumers and sustainable-minded Americans to Obama, to the Senate and to Vilsack, that we want big change, not small change, and that we need to start moving this country toward an energy-efficient, carbon-sequestering, healthy food and farming system that is organic and in transition to organic. We don’t need these biofuels. We don’t need genetically engineered crops. We need to take the climate crisis, the public health crisis, the food crisis seriously and do something about it. We need major change, not small change.
Goodman also noted that if
Vilsack is confirmed, it will be the first time that both the
Agriculture Secretary and the Senate Agriculture Committee chair are
both Iowans. For more reactions to the Vilsack nomination, check out Bleeding Heartland.
EVENT POSTPONED: Join I-Renew to Celebrate Renewable Energy on Winter Solstice Tonight in Iowa City Postponed: watch this space for new date and time...
I-Renew Winter Solstice Event for tonight...Due to unfavorable weather conditions for today and this evening, I-Renew has decided to postpone the Celebration of Renewable Energy scheduled for tonight. A new date will be TBA, though we hope to get together soon to celebrate our accomplishments and collaborate on new endeavors together! Stay safe and warm!
Sunday December 21, 6:00 pm to 10:00 pm Mill Restaurant, 120 E. Burlington St. Iowa City Admission: $5 suggested minimum donation. Public welcome!
If Blagojevich Is Against it, Your State Rep. Should Be For It....Campaign Finance Reform
by Ed Fallon
From 1993 to 2006, Ed served seven terms in the Iowa Legislature, representing residents of downtown Des Moines, the surrounding neighborhoods and the City’s northeast side. Ed’s focus as a lawmaker was to champion the needs of constituency groups treated unfairly by government or neglected by the majority of policy makers. He also became a leader on land-use, the environment, reforming tax increment financing (TIF), and opposing corporate welfare. He is co-founder of I'm for Iowa an Independence Movement for Iowa.
The following is a guest opinion published in the Des Moines Register.
It's easy to muster contempt for Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Politics in America are rife with corruption, but rarely is corruption as brazen and unrepentant as what we've been treated to recently by Illinois' soon-to-be former CEO.
To learn that someone apparently would openly try to sell a U.S. Senate seat shocks and disgusts us.
Blagojevich is a menace and needs to go to the gated community where other Illinois governors before him have gone. But America's campaign-finance system is a far greater menace to democracy. If we can muster shock and disgust for Blagojevich, we should be utterly appalled at the pervasive role of money in politics.
Face it. What we call "elections" have become auctions. The auctioning of U.S. Senate seats occurs every six years - every two years for congressional and state legislative seats. Big donors, corporations and special interests "bid" on the candidate of their choice. In close races, the smart money bids on both candidates, and the one backed by the highest bidders usually wins.
We don't want to believe our elected officials can be bought. But as someone who served for 14 years in the Iowa House, I say with confidence that what big money wants, big money usually gets. Rank-and-file lawmakers may be well-intentioned but often are strong-armed by legislative leaders beholden to corporate donors and special interests. As a result, the most pressing challenges of our time - climate change, budgetary reform, health care, farm policy, to name a few - see practically no progress year after year.
So, while I hope the good people of Illinois fire Blagojevich and fire him soon, I have a more pressing hope that Americans across the country get fired up for campaign-finance reform. In Iowa, Senator-elect Pam Jochum is leading the charge on VOICE (Voter-Owned Iowa Clean Elections). This bill would make it easier for rank-and-file lawmakers to stand up to party leaders, allow more citizens to run for office and give the public far greater access to the halls of power.
The federal equivalent of Jochum's bill is sponsored by Sens. Dick Durbin and Arlen Specter. Both would establish greater fairness, openness and accountability in the financing of elections. Both deserve our strong backing.
When lawmakers consider whether to support campaign-finance reform, perhaps the question they should ask is this: What would Blagojevich do? Well, beyond the governor's attempt to sell a U.S. Senate seat, his veto of a bill to prohibit contributions from donors with state contracts of more than $50,000 makes it clear he's no friend of reform.
And I can't think of a stronger endorsement than that for reducing the role of money in politics.
**BFIA Action Alert**
If you support VOICE, now is a good time to take action. Write a letter to your local paper or to the Des Moines Register [letters@dmreg.com], or contact your legislator.
If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to
hear it, is there sound?
If 300,000 war protesters march on Washington and no one sees it on TV, is there an anti-war movement?
As I begin my first blog post today as incoming editor of
Blog for Iowa,
I would like to quote my friend and mentor Nicholas Johnson, former FCC
Commissioner and media reform activist, who says it best in his book, Your
Second Priority:a Former FCC Commissioner Speaks Out (Myrtle Orchard Press and Lulu.com).
“Whatever is your first priority, whether it is women’s
rights or saving wildlife, your second priority has to be media reform.With it you at least have a chance of
accomplishing your first priority.Without it, you don’t have a prayer.”
Progressive activists who read this blog have been working
tirelessly to bring needed change – to Iowa,
to your communities, to the nation and to the world.You are working on health care, the
environment, issues of peace and justice and you are helping progressive
candidates get elected.
Unfortunately, progress is a painstakingly slow process, due at
least in part to the corporate-owned media which controls everything that is seen
and heard on the airwaves.Have you ever
thought how much easier it would be to make progress if there was equality and
diversity of access to the media?Without access to the mass media, progressives face big obstacles when it comes to getting
the message delivered.
And just imagine what it would be like if we didn’t have to overcome the roadblock
of a substantial number of misinformed individuals, including elected officials and persons in leadership positions, who routinely listen to FOX
News, Rush Limbaugh, and Iowa’s own WHO-Radio, which airs conservative talk
programming 8 ½ hours a day, 5 days a week.
Fortunately, there may be good news on the horizon for progressives and media reform activists.The FCC is about to say good-bye to Chairman
Kevin Martin and new commissioners will soon be appointed.The incoming Obama administration has shown
every sign of being media reform friendly.Localism is making a comeback.Community radio and low power FM stations are cropping up in Iowa and across the
country.The free and open internet is the new great
equalizer (but it is in danger, so we must continue the fight for net
neutrality and high speed internet access to rural areas).Organizations such as Iowa Independent
are providing outstanding online original reporting, andDailykosand Moveon have informed and organized a nation of progressives.
Howard Dean said in 2004 that we must “take back the
corporate-owned media and infuse it with the voice of the people.”At Blog for Iowa, we intend to launch actions related to media issues, continue covering
Iowa news and events, and invite the BFIA community to submit ideas and action alerts specific to your home towns, counties and districts.
Whether your first priority issue is taking on a local coal plant or a hog confinement operation, targeting an elected
official that needs to be ousted, planning a peace march or a letter-writing
effort to a local newspaper, TV or Radio station, Blog for Iowa wants to know about it.
Watch this space for more information about local and statewide actions
related to the issues of the day.Blog for Iowa welcomes your input and suggestions and
will happily post your events and action alerts.Helping progressives in Iowa organize for change is our first
priority.
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement to House Leaders: ENOUGH! iowacci.org
Members of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (CCI) are calling for House leaders Kevin McCarthy and Pat Murphy to remove Dolores Mertz as Chair of the House Agriculture Committee due to her voting record and close ties to the factory farm industry.
Last week, Mertz was re-appointed by House leadership as the Ag Committee chair for the 2009 legislative session. Mertz is starting her eleventh term as a state representative, a seat she retained by a razor-thin margin of 42 votes. For more than a dozen years, she has consistently voted for policies that benefit corporate factory farms and worked against the interests of hundreds of thousands of everyday Iowans. In addition, Mertz's son, Peter, owns a 4,000-head hog factory, which raises other questions about her votes.
"Mertz claims she supports family farms, but her votes and actions clearly show she has bent over backwards to please the factory farm industry," said Kevin Shilling, a CCI member and livestock/poultry farmer. "McCarthy and Murphy knew exactly what they were doing when they re-appointed her as House Ag Chair. It's shameful that they care more about the factory farm industry than the quality of life of everyday Iowans."
As the House Ag chair, Mertz controls what bills pass and don't pass out of her committee. Mertz has voted for dozens of bills that support the factory farm industry. She voted for House File 519 in 1995, a bill that opened the door for corporate factory farms to flood the state. She also more recently voted for the so-called "odor study" that would funnel $23 million of taxpayer dollars to factory farms. Mertz voted for the odor study when it was in her committee and both times it came to the floor of the House for a vote.
CCI members are also calling on McCarthy and Murphy to re-assign Representative Mark Kuhn to the Ag and Environmental Protection Committees. Kuhn served on both committees and introduced legislation that called for stricter regulations on factory farms. He was passed over for a spot on the committees in the 2009 session.
Iowans across the state have demonstrated strong opposition to hog factories for a number of reasons. Among these are the threat of manure spills, which lead to fish kills and water pollution. Factory farms also cause air pollution, threaten public health, and lower the property values of nearby homes.
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement is a 33-year old organization with thousands of members across the state from all walks of life who talk, act and get things done on critical issues affecting all Iowans. CCI members recognize the power of uniting and standing up for what's right. For more information, visit iowacci.org.
**BFIA ACTION ALERT**
Contact Speaker Pat Murphy and Kevin McCarthy to stand with ICCI and voice your support for family farms, not factory farms.
E-mail: Kevin.McCarthy@legis.state.ia.us (Majority Leader) Snail mail: 5220 SE 31st Court, Des Moines, IA, 50320 Home Telephone: 515-953-5221
E-mail: Pat.Murphy@legis.state.ia.us (Speaker) Snail mail: 155 N. Grandview, Dubuque, IA, 52001-6325 Home Telephone: 563-582-5922
For contact info. for any member of the Iowa General Assembly, click here.
UPDATE: Sioux City Council to Waste Time Spazzing Out over Gay Marriage by Jared Strong, Des Moines Register
A [wingnut] city councilman in Sioux City is pushing his colleagues to adopt a resolution [today] that opposes gay marriage.
"The resolution is fairly clear and straightforward: You're either going to support traditional marriage, or you are not," said Councilman Brent Hoffman, the author of the resolution. [Translation: You're either for us or you're again' us, and if you're again' us, by all that is mighty, you're evil!]
The move is mostly symbolic [and a total waste of time and money] because the city lacks legal authority over the issue, but Hoffman said the resolution is important because it clarifies the council's position [as an intolerant, discriminatory body] and directs city departments, boards and commissions to stay in line with that position [although without any authority to enforce said intolerance]. It also asks for a statewide vote on whether gay marriage should be allowed. [Well, I think the horse is out of the barn on that one, Hoff-baby.]
Council members and observers said that four of the council votes will split 2-2 and that Councilman Dave Ferris will cast the deciding vote. [Ferris is just hoping the whole bloody thing will go away.]
The City Council will meet at 4 p.m. Monday. The meeting can be watched online at www.sioux-city.org.
Update: Amidst a huge turnout, the Sioux City Council ultimately voted 3-2 to table the measure, with Councilman Dave Ferris, Mayor Mike Hobart, and Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Rixner showing enough common sense to realize that this was a potential policy decision for which the council had no authority, but citing "legal implications." Hoffman, the instigator of the discriminatory measure, now considers it to be defeated since only one of the three members who voted to table it can reintroduce it.
Kos: Grassley Vulnerable to Vilsack Challenge by Kos, Daily Kos
Following the assumption that it is never too early to discuss the NEXT election, Markos, over at Daily Kos, has compiled this information for those of us who are interested in Iowa politics.
[A new] Research 2000 [poll] for Daily Kos [shows the following numbers for a Grassley/Vilsack match up in 2010].
12/8-10. Likely voters. MoE 4%
Grassley (R) 48 Vilsack (D) 44
Woah, what? Sen. Chuck Grassley is vulnerable? Granted, it's against the state's top Democrat -- former Gov. Tom Vilsack, and there's currently no indication that Vilsack is planning on running. But the [common wisdom] is that Grassley serves at will, and can hold the seat for life if he so desires. That belief is challenged by these numbers. Against the right Democrat, Grassley would face a tough fight.
Grassley Approve 57 Disapprove 36
Vilsack Approve 55 Disapprove 36
Their approval numbers are essentially even, and in the crosstabs, they both enjoy equal approval from independents. This would certainly be a battle of titans, pitting two popular politicians against each other. Expect incoming DSCC chief Bob Menendez to put Vilsack in his speed dial.
As for Grassley, he'll be 77 on Election Day 2010. While many political observers expect him to retire, others beg to differ. No one really knows for sure. Now if Chuck expected an easy re-election, his chances of retiring diminish. But does he really want to raise millions and fight hard in a Blue-trending state, only to sit in the deep minority? Doesn't seem so appealing.
Iowa Colleges Attract Young People But Cannot Retain Grads Generation Iowa
A report last week out of Generation Iowa suggests that Iowa's great brain drain is not a thing of the past.
The state of Iowa is faced with a difficult mismatch of current workforce needs and the jobs the Next Generation of workforce seeks. The research completed in 2008 by the Generation Iowa Commission and Iowa Workforce Development has clarified the needs of the state, identified strengths and challenges and worked to create solutions.
Iowa’s Next Generation strengths Iowa is a “Top 5” importer of college students and ranks #1 in the Midwest for college student attraction.
Iowa remains a popular place with a strong Next Generation brand.
Iowa has an active Young Professionals of Iowa organization.
In 2006, Iowa had a net college student “brain gain” of 8,200 young people.
21 percent of Iowans have college degrees, and an estimated 33 percent of the next generation workforce is getting at least a bachelor’s degree.
Iowa’s Next Generation challenges Iowa had a “brain drain” of 19,500 college-educated people for 1995-2000.
12 percent of currently available jobs in Iowa are for college graduates.
Iowa’s brain drain is 4th worst in the nation since 2000.
Iowa is one of only six states facing a declining rate of the percent of our population with at least a bachelor’s degree.
Iowa has the 9th lowest average wage out of 10 regional states.
Iowa’s wages are 20 percent lower than the national average.
Cost of living adjustments do not make up the wage gap.
Iowa college students rank 17th nationally at a volunteer rate of 32 percent.
*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.
*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country