The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Daily Archive

April 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

By Year

Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  Benefits of Voter Paper Trail Justify Cost of Machines
Benefits of Voter Paper Trail Justify Cost of Machines


The following appeared as a Guest Column in the Cedar Rapids Gazette

By Tom Slockett, Johnson County Auditor and Commissioner of Elections

Did you know that Carteret County, N.C., lost more than 4,400 votes on new electronic voting machines in the 2004 presidential election? This was more than the margin of victory in a statewide race.

In contrast, for the same election, Nevada began implementing machines with a Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail. A statewide audit of 145 machines and 64,424 votes matched electronic totals with paper records at 100 percent accuracy.

Now is the time for voters to decide which system they prefer. During 2006, all voters will cast ballots on equipment purchased after the 2000 presidential election. Problems that year in Florida spurred Congress to mandate two key requirements for voter-operated ballot machines:

Second-chance voting. Voters must be informed when they make certain types of errors on their ballots and be given the opportunity to make corrections. Otherwise, for example, if two choices are made for the office of president, no vote for that office can be counted.

Accessible voting equipment. More people with visual impairment must be able to vote a secret ballot without assistance. One device per precinct, such as a Direct Recording Electronics or touch-screen voting machine, must be equipped with earphones.

No voting system in place for the 2000 presidential election met these requirements. This fact, along with federal funds to grease the skids, made the decision to purchase new voting equipment a practical reality nationwide.

The Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail allows choices on a touch screen as they are simultaneously printed out beneath Plexiglas on a roll of paper that scrolls next to the screen. Different languages can be selected and either viewed or heard with headphones. Choices are printed until mistakes are corrected and the printout correctly displays the voter’s choices. The printout scrolls out of sight onto a storage roll inside the machine after the voter has checked it. This printed vote can be recounted to prove that the results reported by the computer accurately reflect voters’ choices.


This system is a powerful disincentive against corrupt programming or alteration of electronically stored vote totals due to the existence of proof.


A Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail sounds good, so what’s the catch? Simply put, it costs more. Many more trees are killed with a paper audit trail, and additional chemicals are required for thermal paper, toner or ink. Costs are incurred for inventory, storage and recycling or disposition. Printers jam, and the serial record of votes on a paper roll requires special procedures to preserve the secrecy of the ballot.


People with vision impairment can’t verify their votes on most existing Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails. At significant additional cost, technology exists to include a scanner with character recognition and voice software to allow independent verification through headphones.


Voting technology is continuing to evolve and improve. Direct Recording Electronics systems without a Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail may someday work in practice, as experts say. But with no paper trail, only a relatively small percentage of voters actually have the sophistication to verify vote totals based on their own knowledge, without reliance on ‘‘experts.’’


The advantage of a Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail is that any voter can understand its verification process. The paper record of votes individuals have verified with their own eyes or ears are simply counted and totaled. At this point in time, during significant change and controversy regarding reliability and accuracy of voting machines, care in reassuring the voters of the legitimacy of our elections is critical.


Yes, the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail system costs more. How much is it worth for voters to be confident that their ballots are counted as they are cast?

Action:  Contact your legislator to let them know you want your vote verified.


(Source)

   Click here to receive action alerts from Rapid Response - Iowa


View Article  Paperless Voting Machines to be Installed in Iowa Unless We Act Now
  Paperless Voting Machines to be Installed in Iowa Unless We Act Now


The following is a letter sent to Iowa Secretary of State Chet Culver by Maureen McCue MD, PhD, Coordinator Iowa Chapter, Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Please cut and paste this post and get it out to EVERYONE in your e-mail circle ASAP.

Call or write your legislators, your local newspaper, and Secretary Culver.  See contact info. below.
 
Dear Secretary Culver,

I am very concerned that Iowa may not make paper verification of electronic voting machines available to voters and I'm even more concerned about how this will adversely impact our democracy, our already poor voter turnout and diminishing faith in our electoral system.  I turn to you for your help and advice.  

During the HAVA  meeting in Cedar Rapids, March 28th it was announced that the Iowa Senate had unanimously voted for voter verified paper trails to the electronic voting machines being installed in Iowa.  At the time I and, I'm sure, many in the audience, felt this was a done deal: that Iowans would be able to verify that their voting machine had correctly captured their intended vote.  I've since learned that the companion bill did not make it through the House to the General Assembly and that this issue of great concern to so many Iowans will die soon without approval.  Without a vote in the House for voter verification on paper, Iowa will install paperless machines at which point change to paper verification will not be possible.   

Going with a system that does not verify each and every person's vote is a very critical mistake.  I understand that those opposed to paper raise issues of cost, waste of paper, and the difficulties of training all the precincts in their use and maintenance.  While these are not trivial issues, they are not sufficient reasons to risk loosing even more faith in our electoral process.

I've learned some legislators believe there is only one option for a voting machine with a paper printer option and it is too expensive.  But, from comments made at your meeting I understood that several companies including one called Micro Vote, ES &S, as well as Diebold and Sequoia were being considered for use in Iowa.

Democracy is not easy or cheap (look how much we spend on the military that supposedly protects our rights and freedoms, especially or freedom to vote).   If we don't urge our representatives to vote on this issue in favor of voter verified paper trails, we essentially give up our right to verifiable elections.  This is a very dangerous and steep, slippery slope to the end of democracy as we understand it.  I know you are as concerned as I am that our voting system works for all our citizens.  At the very least, let's make sure that every vote cast counts - accurately.  The time to reclaim our democracy is today!!  Please be certain that this issue is not allowed to die.  Please tell me what I can do and what you will do to verify that our votes are recorded as intended.
    
Maureen McCue MD, PhD
Coordinator,  Iowa Chapter
Physicians for Social Responsibility
____________________

Take Action:  To find and write your legislator click here:  www4.legis.state.ia.us/find-leg/

Click here to Contact Sec. of State Chet Culver
or call 515-281-0145

Then contact the media: 

Click on the links below to send a letter, or copy and paste the address into your e-mail.

The Des Moines Register  letters@news.dmreg.com or call 800-532-1455

Ames Tribuneletters@amestrib.com or call (800) 234-TRIB

Iowa State Daily  letters@iowastatedaily.com  or call (515) 294-3557

Cedar Rapids Gazette editorial@gazettecommunications.com  or call 319-398-5869

Quad Cities Times   opinions@qctimes.com  or call (800) 437-4641

Sioux City Journal  larry.myhre@lee.net  or call  800-397-9820

Iowa City Press-Citizen newsroom@press-citizen.com or call 319-337-3181

The Daily Iowan  daily-iowan@uiowa.edu  or call 319-335-6063

Mason City Globe Gazette  www.globegazette.com  or call toll free: 800-421-0524

Waterloo-Cedar Falls Courier  tish.flattery@wcfcourier.com or call 800-798-1741

Please write or call and pass this on.  We need EVERYONE’s help on this action.


  Iowa Rapid Response needs letter-writers, researchers, readers, and media watchers.  Join the Rapid Response-Iowa team.


Help Support
Blog for Iowa




Get your
That One
Won! 2008
Button Here!

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Iowa Sites

AFSCME Iowa

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Partnership

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

One Iowa (GLBT)

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media