The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Subscribe to Democracyforiowa

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Sunlight Seeker

Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.

Daily Archive

November 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30

By Year

Recent Visitors

Sam Garchik - Mon 02 Jun 2008 10:10 AM CDT 
atomburke - Fri 23 May 2008 03:49 PM CDT 
salman - Fri 23 May 2008 06:28 AM CDT 
megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT 
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  Iowans for Better Local TV: The Time To Act Is Now
 
Iowans for Better Local TV: 
The Time To Act Is Now

IBLTV.Org

Iowans for Better Local Television, Iowa's grassroots media reform group, is now leading an effort to ask the FCC to hold a hearing to review whether Iowans are being well-served by our Sinclair-owned station KGAN.  This year, all of Iowa's TV stations are up for license renewal which provides a rare opportunity for the public to have input.  We must act now, because the next license renewal is eight long years away.    
 
IBLTV has spent the past year getting organized and taking action.  After joining with the successful , nation-wide Sinclair advertiser boycott last fall, IBLTV co-sponsored the successful FCC Town Meeting on the Future of Media in October which drew over 500 Iowans.  IBLTV has also met with Congressman Leach, published columns in newspapers, made appearances on radio and TV, and has even drawn the attention of national media with a feature story in the broadcast industry publication, Broadcasting and Cable magazine.  
 
Here is what we are asking you to do:
 
(1) Sign our on-line signature petition asking the FCC for a meaningful license review.  Just click here:  "Sign the IBLTV Petition." If everyone takes this quick, simple action, it will help us enormously to demonstrate citizen support for this effort.
 
(2) Please let us know if you have a personal anecdote that illustrates an example of how you feel our Sinclair-owned station has not served the public interest.
 
P.S.  Like all organizations we need members and financial support.  It is not a condition of your participation in this project.  But if you are able and willing please consider  joining IBLTV.  Our group is focused on ACTION, not sitting around and complaining.  If you would like to get more  involved in media reform, there are many oopportunities available.  Bring your ideas!  You can sign up to be on IBLTV's online discussion group by contacting us at feedback@ibltv.org.    
 
Even small contributions help.  You can make checks payable to:  IBLTV, PO BOX 578, Iowa City, Iowa  52242. (Donate $25 and receive a bonus gift, the DVD Outfoxed while supplies last)!
 
IBLTV would like to thank you for your concern about media issues and we appreciate whatever you can do.  Please feel free to contact us at:  feedback@ibltv.org.


View Article  Tax cuts adversely impact programs for the poor
  Tax cuts adversely impact programs for the poor

gazetteonline.com

The following Letter to the Editor was published in the Cedar Rapids Gazette
 
by Ellen Fisher

The Gazette's Nov. 11 editorial, "Tightening government's belt", applauded congressional efforts to cut spending but ignored the impact of tax cuts. House Republicans led by Rep. Jim 'Nussle, R-Iowa, are trying to cut $54 billion over five years primarily from programs that benefit the poor — food stamps, school meals, Medicaid, student loans, foster care, child support enforcement, etc.

The budget deficit cited as rationale for the cuts has been greatly enlarged by four successive years of tax cuts benefiting the very wealthy, and Republicans hope to add $70 billion in additional tax cuts this year. For the 2005 tax year the wealthiest 0.2 percent of taxpayers will receive almost $35 billion from already enacted Bush tax cuts, an amount that exceeds the annual cost of the food stamp program.

The poverty rate last year rose for the fourth consecutive year, marking the first time on record that household incomes failed to increase for five straight years. During this time costs for housing, energy, medical care and prescription drugs rose sharply, so it isn't surprising that in October the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that hunger increased for the fifth straight year. Speaking of the current economic recovery, Philip Swa-gel of the conservative American Enterprise Institute said, "The gains have gone to owners of capital and not to workers."

With hunger and poverty both increasing steadily, the entire Iowa congressional delegation should be urged not to cut programs that protect the poor. No new tax cuts should be passed, and those already enacted should be allowed to expire.

Ellen Fisher lives in Cedar Rapids.


View Article  A Town Hall Meeting on Wal-Mart: Low Prices at what cost?

  


A Town Hall Meeting on Wal-Mart:  Low Prices at what cost?


A Town Hall discussion on ensuring Iowa’s workers have fair and equal access to affordable, quality health care.

Monday, November 14
7:00-8:00 PM
Iowa City Public Library, Meeting Room A
123 S. Linn St.

In a disturbing nationwide trend, more state studies are revealing that Wal-Mart employees are the top recipients of tax-payer paid health care.  Come and learn about how this practice impacts you as an Iowa tax-payer and local efforts to hold large corporations accountable.

This event is part of Wal-Mart Watch Higher Expectations Week (Nov. 13-19) nationwide.

Guest Speakers

Sen. Joe Bolkcom
Sarah Swisher, Iowa for Health Care
Mark Ginsberg, owner, Ginsberg Jewelers
Andy Grossman, Executive Director, Wal-Mart Watch

Sponsors

Iowa For Health Care

Iowa City Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa City Stop Wal-Mart

Working Families Win

SEIU 199

Wal-Mart Watch

For questions contact Michael Edwards at (319) 621-0222
Joe Bolkcom at 319-337-6280
www.joebolkcom.org


Click here to join 

  Iowans for Better Local TV (IBLTV)

Iowa's Media Reform Group

Click here to sign our petition to the FCC
 

View Article  Higher Expectations for Iowa's Working Families - A Town Hall Meeting!

 Higher Expectations for Iowa’s Working Families - A Town Hall Meeting!


A Town Hall Meeting for people concerned about good jobs, the environment, and a healthy future for their community

Tuesday, November 15
7:00-8:30 PM    
Waterloo Center for the Arts, 225 Commercial, Waterloo

We know that decisions made in Washington, DC, and Des Moines affect the pocketbooks of working families.  We also know that not enough of us connect the dots between public policies and our checkbooks, or believe that things can be different. 

Health care can be affordable.  Jobs can pay good wages.  Our communities can provide a safe environment for our children who want to stay and work here as adults.  Join us to learn more and to take action!


This event is part of Wal-Mart Watch Higher Expectations Week (Nov. 13-19) nationwide.

Guest Speakers
 - David Osterberg, Executive Director, Iowa Policy Project
 - Jonna Higgins, Executive Director, 1000 Friends of Iowa
 - Jim Jontz, President Emeritus, Americans for Democratic
Action


Sponsors
 - Wal-Mart Watch
 - Iowa Farmers Union
 - Iowans for Sensible Priorities
 - Immigrant Voices Project
 - Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement
 - League of Rural Voters
 - Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO
 - Working Families Win
 - Black Hawk Union Council, AFL-CIO
 - Americans for Democratic Action Education Fund
 - Iowa Citizen Action Network
 - SEIU Local 199
 - Iowa for Health Care
 - Iowa/Nebraska Primary Care Association

For more information, contact:  Dave Leshtz, Working Families Win, 319-621-4205


Click here to join
  Iowans for Better Local TV (IBLTV)
Iowa's Media Reform Group
 
Click here to sign our petition to the FCC

Click here to join RapidResponse-Iowa
View Article  WHOM DO YOU TRUST?
WHOM DO YOU TRUST?


In Dubuque, as well as 25 other communities around IOWA, there will be a referendum on the election ballot this coming Tuesday, November 8th.  One of these referenda in particular deals with whether or not a city should create its own government-owned communications utility to compete with private providers.  

City support for the referendum is particularly curious in Dubuque, where the City recently negotiated an unprecedented 15-year franchise agreement with Mediacom.  Some of the items include:

A $300,000 annual updating investment fund to guarantee ongoing financial investment to keep Mediacom's fiber network at the leading edge of broadband technology.

Expanding the network capability from 750 MHz to an 860 MHz system that will support the needs of future business and residential services.

Connecting more than 75 sites with an upgraded I-Net which is a private, city-managed network.  This will provide all government offices in Dubuque (police, fire, city hall, county offices, all schools, and private institutions designated to assist in emergency situations) with an integrated communication system.

Because of these and other insightful franchise items, Dubuque's residents and businesses will benefit from this commitment and more without RISKING ONE RED CENT OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY.

But all of this is in jeopardy unless the citizens of Dubuque VOTE NO on Tuesday, November 8th regarding the referendum.

First of all, it could take up to $80,000,000 (that's right, Million) or more to build a fiber network to compete with the private sector.  This information is based on the city's own feasibility study.

Secondly, do the citizens of Dubuque feel IT IS A RISK putting an $80,000,000 decision in the hands of the 5 APPOINTED individuals on the local utilities board?

Thirdly, why should the taxpaying voters of Dubuque support such a RISKY VENTURE when there is already a well-working system in place that includes competition?

And fourth, what does the City Council of Dubuque plan on doing with the $7,000,000 (yes that's 7 Million) in franchise fees they have already collected from Mediacom?  I know at least one city employee who thinks they should use some of it to pay for city workers' benefits, not cut them like is proposed.  And that is exactly the type of place the money can be used.

Of utmost importance on the Dubuque ballot is the WORDING OF THE REFERENDUM. It leaves no opportunity for a follow-up referendum that would give the public a voice on how much tax they will be assessed.

The Opportunity Dubuque organization says that the election is about "protecting our rights", but the ballot language is so poorly written that some feel it actually takes rights away.

The Mediacom employees in Dubuque give not only their expertise on the job, but also tremendous time and money to the surrounding communities in which they live.

Even the Des Moines Register's editorial board in their November 4th edition says "…the better vote is no…In general, government has no business competing with business.  It should only step in when business fails to deliver goods or services.  Private-sector providers, led by Mediacom Communications, say they've invested millions to upgrade broadband networks to better serve IOWANS and are prepared to invest millions more…"

Other cities with the utility/telecommunications question on the ballot are:

Ackley, Altoona, Anamosa, Asbury, Carlisle, Charles City, Clarinda, Cresco, Glenwood, Hampton, Hiawatha, Hudson, Iowa Falls, Lansing, Manchester, Maquoketa, Marion, Mason City, Norwalk, Parkersburg, Vinton, Waterloo, Waukon, West Union, and Windsor Heights.

So, let's keep things as they are.  We employees of Mediacom do not want to loose our jobs, but we also feel people should not be unduly taxed.

Molly Regan is an employee of Mediacom.

View Article  Unexpected Change At Leopold Center?
Unexpected Change At Leopold Center?


Something rather disturbing crossed my e-mail inbox this morning.  I don't have a supporting link - but will try to provide one if the story hits one of the local papers. (Take that as a disclaimer - if anyone has supporting or refuting stories, I welcome your posts in the comments section.)


Last week, Fred Kirschenmann was given 48 hours to resign as director of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture and to accept a position as the "Distinguished Fellow" of the center.

A new director was appointed before Dr. Kirschenmann was given notice. Over the past five years, Dr. Kirschenmann has worked tirelessly and with great dedication to the vision and work of the center. He has been highly respected by the Center's staff.

The reason for Fred Kirschenmann's removal from the directorship of the Center seems clear. Fred Kirschenmann had not placated agribusiness. They've been ferociously lobbying the dean's office for the past year and a half to get him to stop his work on Ag in the Middle and other projects that benefit farmers and the land.

If you see fit to protest Fred Kirschenmann's removal as Director of the Leopold Center for Sustainble Agriculture, you might make the following points:

1) This is a violation of academic freedom;

2) Fred Kirschenmann's tenure brought hope and opportunity for Iowa's farmers. Removing him caves in to the old paradigm of factory farms and environmental degradation.

3) Agribusiness should not be allowed to dominate the agenda.  Its time to establish a public interest agenda that honors the original mission of the center and mandate of Aldo Leopold's philosophy.

4) The next dean of agriculture at Iowa State should have the guts to stand up for a healthy economy for farmers and a healthy land for all of Iowans. This is what Fred stood for.

Dr. Kirschenmann has worked tirelessly and with great dedication to the mission of the Center. He has not only brought hope and opportunity to farmers in the Midwest, but his vision and skills have also reached into all corners of the country where people who deeply love the land and their communities have seen new ways forward that promise to reverse the environmental degradation and economic decline that they face today.

By removing Dr. Kirschenmann from this position, Iowa State University is allowing outside business interests to effectively control the agenda of a prominent American university, thereby further eroding the once unique independent status of academic institutions in American life. It is particularly troubling that this should occur at a Center established to honor the insights and teachings of Aldo Leopold.

Letters can be sent to:

Benjamin J. Allen
Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost
Iowa State University
Office of the Provost, 1550 Beardshear Hall,
Ames, Iowa 50011-2021
Phone 515-294-9591, provost@iastate.edu

Gregory L. Geoffroy
President, Iowa State University
1750 Beardshear Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
(515) 294-2042
president@iastate.edu


For those interested, the offending "Agriculture of the Middle" program has it's own website:


It would be grievously offensive to nearly everyone in the state of Iowa if Dr. Kirschenmann was removed for researching and promoting economic models that allow Iowa's family farms to stay solvent - isn't that one of the supposed benefits of our land grant universities?


UPDATE:  The Rural Populist blog has been collecting many aspects of this story.  Of particular interest is this story from the Iowa State Daily:


Frederick Kirschenmann, who has held the position since July 2000, was removed from his position Tuesday concerning complaints from Iowa agriculture groups accusing Kirschenmann of not communicating with them, Wintersteen said.

"There was a significant number of folks who felt like they didn't have significant connection to the center," she said.

Among those who complained of Kirschenmann's performance are corn and soybean producers who wanted more research on issues the center had historically dealt with, such as water quality and conservation research, Wintersteen said. She said although the center had some projects in that area, "It was probably just not enough and also there probably could have been more communication on those topics."


These three paragraphs largely confirm the previous story, in particular the following two motivations:

1)  The removal was politically motivated with pressure from outside groups.

2)  The pressure came from people who were bothered by the socio-economic research being done by the Center - evidently the non-controversial "soil and water conservation" research doesn't upset many apple carts.

View Article  The Iowa-New Orleans Recording Connection
The Iowa-New Orleans Recording Connection

by Iowa's Tom Poe, Studio for Recording

The New Orleans disaster wiped out most of the recording studios in the region.  This tragedy is not life-threatening.  However, it is compelling.  Our country is founded on the principle of stimulating creativity and innovation.  Silence music and the arts, which rely on recording studios, and our country suffers.  Of course, it doesn't take a hurricane to do that.  In Iowa, we have the telecom and cable monopolies doing exactly the same thing.

Imagine a child, sitting at a computer.  She plays a tune on her Kazoo.  She clicks and can instantly play back that tune.  She clicks again, and her tune is played back, with the sound of a piano.  She clicks, and she can see her tune as a musical score.  She can edit the notes, and change her tune.  She can add instruments, and create an entire orchestra.

If the computer is nothing more than a low-end PC, and the software is freely available from Stanford University's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, there is no good reason not to have a computer for every child in Iowa, the New Orleans region, or anywhere for that matter.

If every neighborhood had one, we could all be participating.  And the cost?  Free. 

Shane Pressley needs a computer donated, so they can start a community-based recording studio in the New Orleans region.  Can you help?  We need two computers, one for Shane, and one for Iowa.  Each time we work with a community outside Iowa, we also set up a community-based recording studio for Iowa.

You can learn more about this exciting project by visiting
http://www.studioforrecording.org/ or email us at tompoe@studioforrecording.org


DFIA Events Calendar

Add Your Event Here

Iowa Sites

ABC Free

AFSCME Iowa

Algona Wind Farm

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Cyclones for Choice

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Central

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa Global Warming

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Opinion

Iowa Peace

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Policy Research

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

IOWATER

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media