IOWA SURVEY: COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FREEZE FAVORED BY TWO-THIRDS OF MOST LIKELY CAUCUS GOERS, OTHER STATE RESIDENTS
By Plains Justice
Echoing Coal Roll Backs in KS and FL, 4 Out of 5 State Residents Favor More Energy Conservation Over New Coal-Fired Plants; Groups Call on Gov. Culver to Lead the Way.
Listen to news event audio link
Download full survey report (PDF)
DES MOINES, IA.///December 20, 2007///Sending a clear message to state officials and presidential candidates, nearly four out of five Iowans (79 percent) –- including 69 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Independents – think that “Iowa should focus on increased (energy) conservation steps and more fuel efficiency to reduce demand for electricity before it constructs new coal-fired power plants,” according to a major new Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) survey commissioned by Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, Iowa Farmers Union and Plains Justice. Supporters of the “conservation/energy efficiency first” approach include 75 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 67 percent who will attend Republican caucuses and 88 percent who will participate in Democratic caucuses.
As other states including Kansas and Florida take active steps to roll back plans for coal-fired power plants within their borders, Iowa officials are contemplating the future of two such facilities proposed for construction near Waterloo and Marshalltown.
Another key finding of the ORC survey of 1,005 Iowa residents: Two thirds of likely Iowa caucus goers and 65 percent of all state residents – including 58 percent of Republicans, 71 percent of Democrats and 67 percent of Independents – favor a “one-year-long statewide dialogue in Iowa involving state officials, citizens, unions and utility company regulators to help shape the energy future of Iowa during which current coal-fired power plant plans would be frozen to allow for the most comprehensive discussion.”
The survey commissioned by Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, the Iowa Farmer’s Union and Plains Justice also found that roughly nine out of 10 Iowans (89 percent) – including a nearly identical 88 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats and 88 percent of Independents — agree that “the state government of Iowa, as a matter of formal policy, encourage more public and private investment in alternative energy to help create new jobs in the state.”
Commenting on behalf of Iowa Interfaith Power & Light about the new survey findings, Bishop Alan Scarfe of the Episcopal Diocese of Iowa said: “With all our eyes focused on the disappointing response of the United States administration to the conversation and conclusions of the Bali meeting, this is an opportunity for our own Governor of Iowa to demonstrate that many Iowans are among the people within the United States who nevertheless understand the deeper implications of the crisis upon us. From the perspective of the religious communities, the recently proposed coal-fired power plants threaten rather than assist our progress towards renewable energy. The intention of placing them in the demographics of our most at-risk individuals, Marshalltown with its large Latino population, and Waterloo with its greater number of African Americans may have the appearance of providing employment, but at great cost to the health of the participants, as well as the families in the proposed areas. Iowans have shown in this poll that they want time for discussions at the highest level of public representation”
Iowa Farm Union President Chris Petersen said: “In a time of skyrocketing energy costs, Iowa Farmers Union supports legislation that promotes the advancement of renewable energy technology to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels and gives farmers the opportunity to own the means of production.”
Carrie La Seur, president, Plains Justice, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and a member of the Iowa Power Fund Board said: “At a January Iowa Utilities Board hearing, an impressive slate of national experts will testify that the proposed Marshalltown coal plant would be a costly mistake. Iowa’s renewable energy revolution is the answer for our power needs, not a $1.5 billion investment in 19th Century technology. We call on the governor to protect Iowa’s investment by giving our energy and climate planning processes a chance to work before we permit any new coal plants.”
Graham Hueber, senior research, Opinion Research Corporation said: “These findings are bad news for people who want to build coal-fired power plants in Iowa. The survey clearly shows that majorities of Democratic and Republican caucus goers – as well as other Iowa adults – would prefer to see an alternative that does not involve putting new coal-fired power plants in the state. We find strong support here for enhanced energy conservation and a major infusion of state and private investment dollars in clean energy. It is also evident that health concerns associated with power plant pollution are seen as a legitimate public health issue, particularly when it comes to children.”
KEY SURVEY FINDINGS
The ORC survey conducted for Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, the Iowa Farmer’s Union and Plains Justice also found the following:
* More than three out of five Iowans (64 percent) – including 73 percent of Democrats, 54 percent of Republicans and 68 percent of Independents agree with the following statement: “ … the best energy alternative is greater efficiency and conservation to eliminate waste, combined with more wind, solar power and other alternative energy … doing this would ultimately save money in the form of economic benefits to the state, such as cleaner air, healthier children, and fewer public health risks. Therefore, we should not build additional coal-fired power plants in Iowa.”
* More than three in five of Iowans (62 percent) are “concerned about the possible ill health effects - including asthma and heart problems - that could be experienced by you, your family members and others as the result of increased pollution from new coal-fired power plants in Iowa.” This figure includes less than half (48 percent) of Republicans, but 73 percent of Democrats. Three out of four individuals indicating that they will attend a Democratic caucus expressed concern about this issue.
* Three out of four Iowans –- including 61 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants when told: “Coal-fired power plants are the primary source of carbon dioxide pollution - a known contributor to global warming.” This view is shared by 72 percent of those most likely to attend a caucus, including 60 percent of those attending a Republican caucus and 85 percent of those attending a Democratic caucus.
* More than three out of four Iowans (77 percent) -– including 68 percent of Republicans, 84 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants in the state when told: “Much of the power generated at the new coal-fired plants in Iowa would be sold to out of state customers but Iowa would get all or nearly all of the resulting pollution.”
* More than three out of four Iowans (77 percent) –- including 69 percent of Republicans, 85 percent of Democrats and 74 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants when told: “Hundreds of thousands of children live in Iowa within a 30-mile-radius of a coal-fired power plant.” This view is shared by 75 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 68 percent of Republican attendees and 84 percent of Democratic attendees.
* Fewer than one in three Iowans (31 percent) –- including only 42 percent of Republicans, 23 percent of Democrats and 28 percent of Independents — see “access to affordable electricity” as a sufficient justification for building new coal fired power plants in the state.
* Four out five Iowans -– including 71 percent of Republicans, 87 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents – think that older, “grandfathered” power plants should be required to “install the advanced pollution control devices required for new electricity-generating facilities” before new coal-fired power plants are built” in the state. This view is shared by 79 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 67 percent of Republican attendees and 88 percent of Democratic attendees.
* Only about two out of five Iowans (42 percent) say they favor “building new coal-fired power plants in the state,” compared to a total of 58 percent who either oppose new plants or have not yet made up their mind. Only about a third (34 percent) of Democrats favor new plants, compared with 43 percent who oppose them and 23 percent who have not decided. Over half of Republicans (55 percent) support new plants, with 27 percent opposed and 18 percent undecided. Fewer than two in four Independents (38 percent) support new coal-fired power plants, compared to 33 percent who oppose them and 28 percent who are undecided.
* Fewer than two out of five Iowans (37 percent) are aware of “pending plans for coal-fired power plants in Iowa near Waterloo and Marshalltown.” Awareness varies widely by region with 64 percent of those in the Cedar Rapids area (which includes Waterloo) knowing of such plan, 34 percent awareness in Des Moines (closer to Marshalltown) and only 22 percent in the rest of the state.
* A third of respondents said that they will “definitely attend” or are “extremely likely” to attend a caucus, including 31 percent of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats.
* 39 percent of the respondents were Republican/Independents leaning Republican, 47 percent were Democrats/Independents leaning Democratic, 37 percent were Independents, and 2 percent were associated with other parties.
* About nine out of 10 respondents (89 percent) said they are registered to vote.
For full survey findings, go to http://plainsjustice.org/filings-for-marshalltown-iowa-coal-plant-proposal/ on the Web.
METHODOLOGY
Survey results are based on telephone interviews conducted among a representative sample of 1,005 adults aged 18 and over living in private households in Iowa. Interviewing was completed by Opinion Research Corporation during the period of December 7-11, 2007. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the complete sample of Iowa adults. Smaller sub-groups will have larger error margins.
ABOUT THE GROUPS
Iowa Interfaith Power & Light (http://www.ncrlc.com/IICEC.html) is part of a national network dedicated to protecting God’s sacred creation and safeguarding public health. Iowa Interfaith Power & Light has worked with more than 150 faith communities in Iowa to reduce global warming pollution while empowering those most impacted by higher energy costs, by increasing investment in energy efficiency and by creating new revenue streams through clean energy.
The Iowa Farmers Union (http://www.iafu.org) works to sustain and strengthen the family farm agricultural system in the United States through education, legislation and cooperation.
With headquarters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Plains Justice (http://www.plainsjustice.org) is a public interest environmental law center working for environmental justice and sustainable communities in the Northern Plains region of the U.S., including eastern Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa. The Plains Justice docket includes Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and energy policy work.
CONTACT: Ailis Aaron Wolf, (703) 276-3265, and aaaron@hastingsgroup.com.
EDITOR’S NOTE: A streaming audio recording of the news event will be available on the Web as of 7 p.m. CT/8 p.m. ET on December 20, 2007 at http://plainsjustice.org/filings-for-marshalltown-iowa-coal-plant-proposal/.
|
||||
|
Open Thread Recent Articles
Search
BFIA Writer's Guidelines We welcome Submissions Login Sunlight Seeker
Daily Archive Recent Visitors
Sam Garchik - Mon 02 Jun 2008 10:10 AM CDT
atomburke - Fri 23 May 2008 03:49 PM CDT
salman - Fri 23 May 2008 06:28 AM CDT
megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT
Powered by BlogHarbor
 |
Thursday, December 20
IOWA SURVEY: COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FREEZE FAVORED BY TWO-THIRDS OF MOST LIKELY CAUCUS GOERS, OTHER STATE RESIDENTS
by
Sam Garchik
on Thu 20 Dec 2007 11:29 AM CST
Wednesday, December 12
Big Oil and the Senate
by
Sam Garchik
on Wed 12 Dec 2007 10:13 AM CST
Big Oil and the SenateBy True Majority Don't let Big Oil rewrite the Energy BillSeven votes in the Senate and Big Oil. That's all that's standing in the way of energy legislation that an overwhelming majority of Americans support.Last Friday, the Senate voted 53-42 in favor of the House-passed Energy Bill (H.R. 6) -- seven votes short of the 60 needed to block a Republican filibuster. The bill would raise fuel economy standards, require utilities to generate 15% of their electricity from renewable sources, and restore taxes on Big Oil. Now lobbyists from the oil industry are working with their Republican friends to remove the oil tax package and the renewable electricity mandate.1 Don't let the Senate and the oil industry hold the environment hostage. Tell the Senate not to cave in to Big Oil on the Energy Bill. http://act.truemajorityaction.org/energysenate?campaign_KEY=1218 1. "The Widening Chasm on Energy," Truthout, December 11, 2007 |
Iowa Sites Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa Genetic Engineering Action Network Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility Iowa Public Interest Research Group Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates Progressive Action for the Common Good Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT) Iowa Blogs The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities) Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog) Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections Political FalloutFight Iowa Rapid Response Network - Iowa
Iowans for Better Local TV
Air America
The Counterpoint
National FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Media Matters for America
|
||
|
||||