The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Subscribe to Democracyforiowa

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Sunlight Seeker

Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.

Daily Archive

March 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

By Year

Recent Visitors

megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT 
Sam Garchik - Thu 08 May 2008 09:31 AM CDT 
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT 
jasongrandon23 - Thu 24 Apr 2008 09:26 PM CDT 
ChrisLedman - Tue 15 Apr 2008 07:45 AM CDT 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Main Page  »  Energy
View Article  Let’s Be Number One: Improving Iowa’s Utility-Run Energy Efficiency Programs
Let’s Be Number One: Improving Iowa’s Utility-Run Energy Efficiency Programs
By Andrew Johnson and Teresa Galluzzo, The Iowa Policy Project

Electricity is such an integral part of our lives that we may rarely give a thought to the number of things we plug in and turn on each day. Now, however, thinking about our electricity use is vital. Our spiraling consumption of energy from fossil fuel sources is seriously affecting our climate and our pocketbooks.

This report describes Iowa’s electrical consumption and production and focuses on the role energy efficiency (EE) can and must play in Iowa’s future. It describes Iowa’s laudable efforts to invest in EE through utility-run programs and make suggestions for how to effectively carry these efforts further.

Iowa’s Electricity Consumption
Iowa’s electricity sales per capita are higher than the nation’s, our neighboring states, and states that are leaders in EE. Without aggressive action, this will likely remain the case, because our consumption has also been growing faster than each of these other groups of states. From 2000 to 2006, Iowa’s retail sales of electricity increased by an average of 1.5 percent. The nation’s average growth was 0.2 percent, Iowa’s neighboring states averaged 1.2 percent, and leading EE states averaged 0.3 percent.

Iowa’s Electricity Production
Coal is Iowa’s primary source of electricity generation. In 2006, more than 75 percent of Iowa’s electricity was generated from burning coal. Iowa is considerably more dependent on coal than the rest of the nation; the national average was 49 percent. In recent years Iowa has diversified its power sources. Although still a small portion of our electricity production, renewable sources have been a major growth spot in our generation mix.
The Role of Energy Efficiency at the State Level

Iowa’s electricity demand is forecasted to continue increasing. But the realities of fossil fuel costs and climate change mean Iowa needs to reduce its electricity use from fossil fuel sources. Expanding our EE investments can have large, nearly immediate and economically beneficial impacts.

Iowa was an early leader in EE. In 1990 Iowa passed a landmark law requiring the state’s investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to offer EE programs for all types of customers: residential, commercial and industrial. The law also requires Iowa’s municipal electric utilities (Munis) and rural electric cooperatives (RECs) to offer EE programs to their customers, but these programs do not have to be reviewed or approved. In 2006, the IOUs’ programs yielded a 0.8 percent retail energy savings, the Munis saved 0.15 percent and the RECs saved 0.6 percent.

Electric Utilities Energy Efficiency Efforts (2006)
Iowa’s long tradition of EE is a significant and proud accomplishment. However, Iowa is not meeting some of its stated efficiency goals. The 2001 Energy Policy Task Force convened by then-Governor Tom Vilsack, had the goal of meeting all of Iowa’s future energy demand by increasing EE rather than increasing supply. More recently Governor Culver signed the Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform, calling for meeting at least 2 percent of annual retail sales of natural gas and electricity through EE improvements by 2015 and an additional 2 percent annual savings thereafter. Similarly, the legislatively appointed 2007 Energy Efficiency Study Committee suggested increasing annual energy savings to 1.5 percent of retail sales by 2012.

Due to recent lack of federal action on EE, states across the nation are increasing their EE efforts. Overall, states are spending about three times as much as the federal government on efficiency programs. Some of Iowa’s neighboring states in particular have become leaders, outpacing our efforts. Minnesota, which has an electrical system similar to Iowa’s, not only spends more than Iowa on efficiency efforts per capita, but in 2006 Governor Tim Pawlenty called for 1.5 percent per year savings of electric sales, 1 percent of which must come from EE.

Given Iowa’s yet unmet efficiency goals and the fact that states are increasing their efforts and providing us with examples of big EE accomplishments, Iowa needs to seize this opportunity to become an even more energy efficient state. To do this, we must first address shortcomings in our existing programs.

Shortcomings in Iowa’s Utility-Based EE Efforts
• Programs are Confusing, Inconsistent and Not Universally Available
Each of Iowa’s 183 electric utilities runs its own EE programs with a separate set of offerings. As a result, Iowa’s EE effort is sorely lacking in comprehensiveness. Many of the EE measures with the greatest potential for savings are unavailable to many Iowans. If available, utilities’ energy audits are not comprehensive or standard. Financial assistance and advice is generally available only for efficiency upgrades that pertain to the type of energy provided by the utility. For example, gas utilities do not provide compact fluorescent light bulbs.
• Utilities’ Duplication of Program Administration Costs Money
Each of Iowa’s utilities is charged with developing, promoting, administering and evaluating its own EE programs. There is significant duplication of effort, and therefore a great deal of potential cost savings. Iowa’s two electric IOUs spent an average of 27 percent of their total efficiency spending on costs other than EE incentives. More than 50 percent of Munis’ and RECs’ spending was not for incentives.
• Utilities Do Not Have Incentive to Push EE
There is an inherent conflict of interest when a utility is required to encourage its customers to buy less electricity (and hence reduce revenue), and yet is also expected to lead in developing innovative and increasingly effective ways to maximize those lost sales. This fundamental conflict has caused many states to take different approaches to the administration of state-level EE programs such as third-party private or public administration or a regional administration. Others have rewarded utilities for meeting higher EE goals.
• Utilities and State Policy Fail to Prioritize EE
Traditionally, growing electricity demand has been met through increasing supply. Recently, some states have turned to demand-side management to offset demand growth. These states have begun to think of EE as a resource and planned for acquiring efficiency rather than generation. Iowa’s utilities do not treat EE as a resource on par with supply resources. Iowa does not have a statewide EE resource standard nor a requirement that utilities take advantage of cost-effective EE potential. And there is no requirement that Iowa utilities first acquire efficiency potential before pursuing supply-side resources to meet future power demands.
• Misplaced Emphasis on Peak Load Management
Load management is designed to reduce peak load use during the few times when energy demand is high and delivery system reliability is in jeopardy. In 2006, Iowa IOUs spent over $35 million on electric load management, significantly more than any of the other 20 states that implement load management. Load management is an important component of utility planning efforts, and effective programs save both utility and ratepayer dollars. However, load management likely fails to reduce overall energy use or greenhouse gas emissions, and can actually increase both. It also seriously bloats our efficiency spending per capita, ballooning the overall size/cost of the program and making it difficult to place reasonable expectations on improvement and growth in the true efficiency programs. Whereas load response provides economic savings but little, if any, energy savings, EE can provide both quite effectively.

The deficiencies in these programs are reflected in the smaller amount of EE savings Iowa has achieved compared to leading states. In 2000 and 2001 top EE states were achieving electrical EE savings of 0.7 percent to 2 percent of retail sales. During the same period Iowa achieved 0.4 percent annual savings. In recent years, increased spending has brought Iowa’s IOUs savings up substantially to 0.8 percent. However, other states are now aggressively moving toward 1.5 percent to 2 percent annual savings.

Recommendations
Iowa has the potential to move beyond these shortcomings, and more efficiently invest in its EE programs so that our state realizes its true efficiency potential. Other states across the country, including our neighbors are making big strides and Iowa should too.
Other states’ experiences demonstrate that greatest progress in statewide efficiency programs come with some form of third-party administration. We recommend the current rate surcharge be replaced by a uniform public benefits charge on all ratepayers, and the bulk of the resulting public benefits fund be used to establish a third-party, comprehensive, statewide energy efficiency program.

We recommend directing a percentage (starting at 10 percent and rising over time) of the public benefits fund towards a coordinated, guided matching grant program for local (countywide) EE initiatives to harness the power of local creativity, community pride, economic self-interest and personal responsibility.

In addition, we recommend Iowa’s leaders think boldly and establish policies that meet the following principles:
• Align EE, renewable energy and greenhouse gas reduction goals with utility financial interests through legislative and administrative actions.
• Provide universal and comprehensive EE and renewable energy programs and services to all Iowa residents through a public benefits fund created from sales on all energy sources.
• Treat EE as a resource in an integrated resource planning process, establish aggressive EE and renewable energy standards, and require all cost-effective EE and renewable energy be acquired prior to new fossil fuel generation.
• Set aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goals, and incorporate them into all energy-related planning and programs, including peak load management programs and the prioritization and cost-benefit analyses for statewide EE.
• Ensure just and fair policy effects and implementation across the economic spectrum.

For the full report, see
www.iowapolicyproject.org
The Iowa Policy Project was founded in 2001 to promote public policy that fosters economic opportunity while safeguarding the health and well-being of Iowa’s people and the environment. By providing a foundation of fact-based, objective research and engaging the public in an informed discussion of policy alternatives, IPP advances accountable, effective and fair government.

The Iowa Policy Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. Contributions are tax-deductible. For more information, see our website or call (319) 338-0773.
View Article  Tell your senator to make energy efficiency a priority; to vote for SF 2083.
Tell your senator to make energy efficiency a priority; to vote for SF 2083.

By the Iowa Environmental Council

Call or Email Your Senator Today!

Energy efficiency measures allow us to do more with less--to enjoy the same quality of life and energy-related services using less energy. And unlike burning fossil fuels to meet energy needs, energy efficiency does not pollute.

Senate File 2083 will make energy efficiency a priority for Iowa. It will require all utility companies to use a planning tool that will help put energy efficiency first: utilities would compare the costs of energy efficiency, including environmental impacts like greenhouse gas emissions, against the costs of new or expanded fossil fuel generation.

Energy efficiency is among the fastest, cleanest, and cheapest resources available and would see a boost under this bill. If this bill passes, we expect to see a significant increase in the amount of energy efficiency programs implemented. The bill also authorizes the Iowa Utilities Board to set energy savings goals for all utilities and lets utilities pool together to give more Iowans access to their energy efficiency programs.

Senate File 2083, which a senate subcommittee passed this week, now goes to the Senate Natural Resources & Environment Committee for its consideration. If it passes there, it will go to the full senate for a vote and then to the House for their consideration. But first steps first--If your senator is on the Natural Resources & Environment Committee, please contact him/her directly. If not, you can still take action by contacting the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Committee. We've provided their contact information for you.

Your voice matters. Please call or email today.

--------------------------------------

Instructions:

Below is a sample of the kind of message you can write about why energy efficiency should be a priority for Iowa utility companies. Feel free to edit this text and make it your own. And DO CALL OR EMAIL TODAY, to ask your senator and/or the Chairperson and Vice Chair of the Iowa Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment, to vote YES for Senate File 2083.
 
-------------------------

Message to Members of the Natural Resources and Environment Committee:

I am writing to request that you give Senate File 2083 your full support. This bill makes energy efficiency a priority for Iowa's utility companies. Efficiency is a cleaner and cheaper solution for consumers and utilities, compared to putting more fossil fuels online.  Energy efficiency measures allow us to do more with less--to enjoy the same quality of life and energy-related services using less energy.

Besides being cleaner and cheaper, energy efficiency is a good investment for Iowa.

Three major international financial institutions recently announced a set of principles, The Carbon Principles, to guide future lending and investment related to energy. These institutions include Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and Morgan Stanley, which have trillions of dollars of assets worldwide. The first Principle they listed was energy efficiency:

Energy efficiency: "An effective way to limit CO2 emissions is to not produce them. The signatory financial institutions will encourage clients to invest in cost-effective demand reduction, taking into consideration the value of avoided CO2 emissions."

Iowa needs also to invest in energy efficiency first.
Please vote yes for Senate File 2083, and make Iowa a winner economically and environmentally. Please also let me know how you voted, with a letter or an email.

--
Michelle Kenyon Brown
Executive Director
Iowa Renewable Energy Association (I-Renew)
View Article  National Clean Up Dynegy Launch
National Clean Up Dynegy Launch

By the Sierra Club

The Sierra Club is launching a national grassroots campaign tomorrow (Wed. 2/20) to urge Houston-based coal giant Dynegy/LS Power to clean up its act. Event information and details below.

Also of interest: Sierra Club's Mark Kresowik will give a presentation in Des Moines Wednesday night on Energy and Global Warming. Event information and details below.

NATIONAL CLEAN UP DYNEGY LAUNCH:

On January 29th, over the course of an inspiring 8 hours, over 2,000 calls from six states across the country were generated in to Dynegy headquarters! People from Nevada, Arkansas, Texas, Iowa, Michigan, and Georgia - states where Dynegy/LS Power coal-fired power plants are proposed - sent a very clear message into Dynegy's headquarters: We're not going to take your dirty coal plants!

On this Wednesday February 20th, with your help we're expecting to place over 4,000 more calls into Dynegy/LS Power. Join us for a nationwide call-in day of action urging coal giant Dynegy/LS Power to shift investments away from the proposed Elk Run Station coal-fired power plant to cleaner energy solutions.

WHAT: Nationwide Call-in Day of Action

WHEN: Wednesday, February 20th, 2008 from 8:30a to 5:00p

WHERE: Your home/work/coffee shop. Anywhere you have a phone.

WHY? As the largest developer of coal-fired power plants in the country, Dynegy has an opportunity to really shape our energy future. A decision by Dynegy to provide cleaner, healthier more economical energy could give a real boost to our clean energy economy. Investment in renewable energy and efficiency instead of in new coal plants could create good-paying, green jobs in Iowa.

It's time for Dynegy to follow the lead of other companies across the U.S. who have found that switching to cleaner, greener energy can not only be good for the environment, but also for the company's bottom line.

HOW: STEP 1: Pick up your phone and dial 1-877-396-3499 or call David Byford, Director of Public Relations at 713-767-5800 at Dynegy Headquarters in Houston -
*Place calls from the hours of 8:30am - 5:00 pm CS*

STEP 2: When someone answers say, 'Hi there. My name is _________ from_________ (location.) I am calling to urge Dynegy to look beyond coal to cleaner energy solutions, like efficiency and renewables. Please pass my concerns on to the senior management of the company.' You can also add additional comments if you like, such as, 'Efficiency and renewables can meet our energy needs while fighting global warming and creating jobs,' or why you care about this issue.

STEP 3: Email this to 5-10 friends and follow up with them to get them to call. Email me back at josh@greencorps.org or call me at 417-894-6442 to let me know how many calls you generated.

CONTACT: Josh Jones with the Sierra Club, office 515-331-2404 ' cell 417-894-6442 ' josh@greencorps.org

Want to take part in our phone tree? E-mail Josh ( josh@greencorps.org )

For more information, visit www.sierraclub.org/coal

ENERGY AND GLOBAL WARMING PRESENTATION:

Mark Kresowik , Sierra Club Clean Energy Organizer, will give a presentation on energy and global warming issues.

The program is from 7:30 to 9 p.m. at Grace United Methodist Church, 37th Street and Cottage Grove Avenue, just north of Interstate Highway 235 in Des Moines.
Contact Jane at 223-5047 for more information.

Kresowik has worked on energy efficiency issues for more than three years and will explain how Iowa could reach a goal of at least 2 percent of annual energy sales with energy efficiency. He will discuss coal-fired power plant issues, greenhouse gas emissions, Cool Cities efforts around the state and current legislative efforts to address global warming. He'll also discuss how Iowa could reach a goal of 80 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Kresowik is an organizer with Sierra Club's Midwest Clean Energy Campaign in Iowa. He has assisted and coordinated volunteers on campaigns against two new coal plants, two existing coal plants and several Cool Cities campaigns, and has worked extensively on state and feder al global warming issues.

Please participate in the call-in event and then join us that evening for a great presentation.
Regards, Josh Jones
Conservation Organizer, Sierra Club josh@greencorps.org
515-331-2403 - office
417-894-6442 - cell
515-331-0225 - fax

View Article  IFU Legislative Alert: Support Locally Owned Energy!
IFU Legislative Alert: Support Locally Owned Energy!

By the IFU

By the way, I've added some new content. The delegate tracker, courtesy of MSNBC (which, as a caveat, has been the most generous towards Obama of all the networks out there).

We enourage our membership to contact their legislators to remind them that Locally Owned Renewable Energy needs to be supported this session. IFU has policy in place that calls for renewable energy facilities owned by farmers.  We need to cut down barriers farmers encounter when they attempt to invest in renewable energy facilities. Farmers need to be able to invest in an Iowa rural resource. The renewable energy business is not the sole domain of the state's largest utilities and biofuel companies. Ask your legislator to work on policy for residential and comercial facilities owned by farmers. Two of the best current opportunities are below:
 
SF 355,  C-BED , Policy modeled after Minnesota's successful law to encourage locally owned energy
 
A handout prepared by I-RENEW is attached.

SF 2070, RENEWABLE ENERGY PURCHASES & FACILITIES.
Increases the percentage for utility purchase from alternative energy facilities to 14% by 2014, 20% by 2020 & 25% by 2025. Allows excess amounts to be resold. Establishes specific production requirements for different alternative sources (350 megawatts must be from community-owned renewable energy sources by 2014, 500 megawatts by 2020 and 625 megawatts by 2025; 80 megawatts from a sustainable, closed-loop biomass facility by 2014; 20 megawatts from methane gas recovery and 5 megawatts from a solar energy). Makes the biomass, methane and solar facilities for renewable tax credits.

For more information on these items, contact IFU board member and energy lobbyist Gregg Heide at 712 468 2815 or email him at gheide@evertek.net. For information on other IFU legislative activity, call lobbyist Judie Hoffman at 515 292 2660 or email judiehoffman@yahoo.com.

Iowa Farmers Union
PO Box 8988
528 Billy Sunday Rd
Ames, IA  50014
800-775-5227
iafu@isunet.net
www.iafu.org
View Article  Jan. 16 and 17 coal plant speaker events, Des Moines and Iowa City
Jan. 16 and 17 coal plant speaker events, Des Moines and Iowa  City

By Plains Justice

"At a January Iowa Utilities Board hearing, an impressive slate of experts will testify that the proposed Marshalltown coal plant would be a costly mistake.   Iowa's renewable energy revolution is the answer for our power needs, not a $1.5 billion investment in 19th century technology."

- Carrie La Seur, President, Plains Justice

Plains Justice, Environmental Advocates, Physicians for Social Responsibility and Sierra Club invite you to meet these experts.

Join Dr. James Hansen, Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, speaking as a private citizen, along with six other nationally recognized experts on global warming, public health, energy conservation, alternative energy and economic sustainability.  Dr. Hansen, Dr. Neil Harl, Tom Sanzillo, Dr. Kristen Welker-Hood, Scudder Parker, David Schlissel and Dr. Ezra Hausman will summarize their testimony and take questions from the audience.

A new poll shows that Iowans want an energy policy that safeguards our grandchildren's future, not cheap short-term fixes with devastating long-term consequences. Iowans have the vision and common sense to see the economic opportunity in alternative energy, efficiency and   conservation, which keep our communities and our world healthy and sustainable.

Join us at one of these two events and be a part of Iowa's clean energy future

Wednesday, January 16th

State Historical Society of Iowa

600 East Locust Street

Des Moines, Iowa

Moderator, Senator Rob Hogg

7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.


Thursday, January 17th

Old Brick Community Center

26 E. Market St

Iowa City, Iowa

Moderator, Professor Craig Just

7:00 to 8:30 p.m.

 

You Are Also Invited to a Plains Justice Fundraiser Before the Iowa City Speaker Event:

Thursday, January 17th,

Old Brick Community Center,

 26 E. Market St., Iowa City, Iowa,

5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

$15 per person, $25 per couple, $10 Seniors and Students

Beverages and hors d'œuvres will be served

RSVP to plainsjustice116@mchsi.com

Plains Justice is an environmental justice law center based in Cedar Rapids.  Our founding in 2006 was in part a response to a nationwide rush to build 150+ coal burning power plants, the biggest industrial source of global warming gases.   Forty-two have been proposed in the Midwest alone. We have had some great successes as we challenge proposed plants in Waterloo and Marshalltown, Iowa; Big Stone City, South Dakota; and Gascoyne and South Heart, North Dakota

Finding alternatives to coal plants means working hard to create solutions. Our new Clean Energy Ambassador project, for example, will help small utilities improve their bottom line by implementing proven, cost-effective energy efficiency programs that lower bills.

This is a real fight to safeguard our grandchildren's future.  The health and sustainability of our communities and our world are at stake.   Stand with us as we work for truly clean energy, not short-sighted fixes with disastrous long-term consequences.

--
Carrie La Seur, Ph.D., J.D.
President
Plains Justice
100 First Street SW
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52404
Work: 319-362-2120
Fax: 866-484-2373
http://www.plainsjustice.org
View Article  We Must TAKE Our Country Back!

We Must TAKE Our Country Back!


By Caroline Vernon

Whether it’s health care, the cost of education, our environment or global trade, Corporate America is holding us all hostage to the almighty dollar. Greed continues to trump need as corporations make record profits while more and more Americans fall into poverty every year. Congress allows industry to write policy, and legislators don’t even read the bills they enact. The average person would lose their job for gross negligence. The pharmaceutical/insurance lobbies make billions on the grief of others, systematically denying people essential treatment or drugs in order to save a buck. Half of our taxpayer money goes to the Pentagon who “loses” over a trillion dollars and “it’s nothing but a thing” yet we have to beg to fund health care for our children. Agri-Business dominates at the expense of our environment and health as 85% of our food is now genetically modified, our meat is ridden with hormones and antibiotics, and pesticides have permeated the water table. Global trade agreements allow corporations to exploit for profit with no safeguards in place for workers or the environment.

It is our moral imperative to stand up and say no more! John Edwards seems to be the only candidate that understands that we have to make an aggressive push to take our country back – the key word being “take”. While it is important to be able to bring everyone to the table, we can’t continue to allow Corporate America to eat all the food.

Which comes down to, follow the money…

Edwards and Obama are my two top picks but there are some important distinctions to be made here. I think Obama is awesome and I will support him whole heartedly if he gets the Democratic nod, but as an activist, and more importantly as a mother and your sister, there is way too much at stake in this election, not only for our country but for the planet. Corporate America will never give up their stranglehold on America or the rest of the world so we must TAKE IT from them! There is no negotiating a moral standard… and frankly, that’s what this election is about.

There are two main issues that concern me about Obama; the fact that he voted for the Peru Trade agreement (more of the same of what ails us), and more egregiously, the fact that he is promoting nuclear energy. Coincidentally, Obama has accepted a lot of money from Exelon Nuclear and only stopped taking corporate monies this past year once he decided to run for President. I commend him for that recent decision but I am horrified that he is promoting  nuclear power.

The current energy bill before Congress may have 10 billion dollars allocated toward renewable energy, and that rocks, but if you look at the whole pie, it’s too little too late! 25 billion is allocated for guaranteed loans to build new nuclear sites and billions more for coal fired plants. I mean, this is what I am talking about people… Corporate America writing OUR policy! Do ya’ll remember all the hoopla about storing the nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain? Do you want that in your backyard? Is it OK as long as it’s stored in someone else’s backyard (out of sight, out of mind)? Do you really think our Earth Mother will be served by that? We need to save Her in order to save ourselves. Almost everything we do generates some form of waste by-product. Instead of adding to it, especially nuclear waste, we need to use our considerable ingenuity to invent our way out of this mess. It is our only true hope.  What we absolutely cannot afford is more of the same… business as usual.

Corporate America has had the resources and the necessary information to create new technologies for decades.  Rather than doing the right thing, and truly be leaders of innovation, much of their resources have been spent preventing said technologies from entering the marketplace because, God forbid, that could hurt their bottom line. If their shareholders weren't so blinded by their own greed, they would be able to recognize the incredible opportunity that is presenting itself NOW. Corporate America and our elected officials could simply CHOOSE to lead this necessary technological revolution, but it remains to be seen.... so it's up to us.

We must TAKE our country back!

View Article  IOWA SURVEY: COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FREEZE FAVORED BY TWO-THIRDS OF MOST LIKELY CAUCUS GOERS, OTHER STATE RESIDENTS
IOWA SURVEY: COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT FREEZE FAVORED BY TWO-THIRDS OF MOST LIKELY CAUCUS GOERS, OTHER STATE RESIDENTS

By Plains Justice

Echoing Coal Roll Backs in KS and FL, 4 Out of 5 State Residents Favor More Energy Conservation Over New Coal-Fired Plants; Groups Call on Gov. Culver to Lead the Way.

Listen to news event audio link

Download full survey report (PDF)

DES MOINES, IA.///December 20, 2007///Sending a clear message to state officials and presidential candidates, nearly four out of five Iowans (79 percent) –- including 69 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Independents – think that “Iowa should focus on increased (energy) conservation steps and more fuel efficiency to reduce demand for electricity before it constructs new coal-fired power plants,” according to a major new Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) survey commissioned by Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, Iowa Farmers Union and Plains Justice. Supporters of the “conservation/energy efficiency first” approach include 75 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 67 percent who will attend Republican caucuses and 88 percent who will participate in Democratic caucuses.

As other states including Kansas and Florida take active steps to roll back plans for coal-fired power plants within their borders, Iowa officials are contemplating the future of two such facilities proposed for construction near Waterloo and Marshalltown.

Another key finding of the ORC survey of 1,005 Iowa residents: Two thirds of likely Iowa caucus goers and 65 percent of all state residents – including 58 percent of Republicans, 71 percent of Democrats and 67 percent of Independents – favor a “one-year-long statewide dialogue in Iowa involving state officials, citizens, unions and utility company regulators to help shape the energy future of Iowa during which current coal-fired power plant plans would be frozen to allow for the most comprehensive discussion.”

The survey commissioned by Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, the Iowa Farmer’s Union and Plains Justice also found that roughly nine out of 10 Iowans (89 percent) – including a nearly identical 88 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats and 88 percent of Independents — agree that “the state government of Iowa, as a matter of formal policy, encourage more public and private investment in alternative energy to help create new jobs in the state.”

Commenting on behalf of Iowa Interfaith Power & Light about the new survey findings, Bishop Alan Scarfe of the Episcopal Diocese of Iowa said: “With all our eyes focused on the disappointing response of the United States administration to the conversation and conclusions of the Bali meeting, this is an opportunity for our own Governor of Iowa to demonstrate that many Iowans are among the people within the United States who nevertheless understand the deeper implications of the crisis upon us. From the perspective of the religious communities, the recently proposed coal-fired power plants threaten rather than assist our progress towards renewable energy. The intention of placing them in the demographics of our most at-risk individuals, Marshalltown with its large Latino population, and Waterloo with its greater number of African Americans may have the appearance of providing employment, but at great cost to the health of the participants, as well as the families in the proposed areas. Iowans have shown in this poll that they want time for discussions at the highest level of public representation”

Iowa Farm Union President Chris Petersen said: “In a time of skyrocketing energy costs, Iowa Farmers Union supports legislation that promotes the advancement of renewable energy technology to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels and gives farmers the opportunity to own the means of production.”

Carrie La Seur, president, Plains Justice, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and a member of the Iowa Power Fund Board said: “At a January Iowa Utilities Board hearing, an impressive slate of national experts will testify that the proposed Marshalltown coal plant would be a costly mistake. Iowa’s renewable energy revolution is the answer for our power needs, not a $1.5 billion investment in 19th Century technology. We call on the governor to protect Iowa’s investment by giving our energy and climate planning processes a chance to work before we permit any new coal plants.”

Graham Hueber, senior research, Opinion Research Corporation said: “These findings are bad news for people who want to build coal-fired power plants in Iowa. The survey clearly shows that majorities of Democratic and Republican caucus goers – as well as other Iowa adults – would prefer to see an alternative that does not involve putting new coal-fired power plants in the state. We find strong support here for enhanced energy conservation and a major infusion of state and private investment dollars in clean energy. It is also evident that health concerns associated with power plant pollution are seen as a legitimate public health issue, particularly when it comes to children.”

KEY SURVEY FINDINGS

The ORC survey conducted for Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, the Iowa Farmer’s Union and Plains Justice also found the following:

    * More than three out of five Iowans (64 percent) – including 73 percent of Democrats, 54 percent of Republicans and 68 percent of Independents agree with the following statement: “ … the best energy alternative is greater efficiency and conservation to eliminate waste, combined with more wind, solar power and other alternative energy … doing this would ultimately save money in the form of economic benefits to the state, such as cleaner air, healthier children, and fewer public health risks. Therefore, we should not build additional coal-fired power plants in Iowa.”
    * More than three in five of Iowans (62 percent) are “concerned about the possible ill health effects - including asthma and heart problems - that could be experienced by you, your family members and others as the result of increased pollution from new coal-fired power plants in Iowa.” This figure includes less than half (48 percent) of Republicans, but 73 percent of Democrats. Three out of four individuals indicating that they will attend a Democratic caucus expressed concern about this issue.
    * Three out of four Iowans –- including 61 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants when told: “Coal-fired power plants are the primary source of carbon dioxide pollution - a known contributor to global warming.” This view is shared by 72 percent of those most likely to attend a caucus, including 60 percent of those attending a Republican caucus and 85 percent of those attending a Democratic caucus.
    * More than three out of four Iowans (77 percent) -– including 68 percent of Republicans, 84 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants in the state when told: “Much of the power generated at the new coal-fired plants in Iowa would be sold to out of state customers but Iowa would get all or nearly all of the resulting pollution.”
    * More than three out of four Iowans (77 percent) –- including 69 percent of Republicans, 85 percent of Democrats and 74 percent of Independents — are less likely to support new coal-fired power plants when told: “Hundreds of thousands of children live in Iowa within a 30-mile-radius of a coal-fired power plant.” This view is shared by 75 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 68 percent of Republican attendees and 84 percent of Democratic attendees.
    * Fewer than one in three Iowans (31 percent) –- including only 42 percent of Republicans, 23 percent of Democrats and 28 percent of Independents — see “access to affordable electricity” as a sufficient justification for building new coal fired power plants in the state.
    * Four out five Iowans -– including 71 percent of Republicans, 87 percent of Democrats, and 86 percent of Independents – think that older, “grandfathered” power plants should be required to “install the advanced pollution control devices required for new electricity-generating facilities” before new coal-fired power plants are built” in the state. This view is shared by 79 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 67 percent of Republican attendees and 88 percent of Democratic attendees.
    * Only about two out of five Iowans (42 percent) say they favor “building new coal-fired power plants in the state,” compared to a total of 58 percent who either oppose new plants or have not yet made up their mind. Only about a third (34 percent) of Democrats favor new plants, compared with 43 percent who oppose them and 23 percent who have not decided. Over half of Republicans (55 percent) support new plants, with 27 percent opposed and 18 percent undecided. Fewer than two in four Independents (38 percent) support new coal-fired power plants, compared to 33 percent who oppose them and 28 percent who are undecided.
    * Fewer than two out of five Iowans (37 percent) are aware of “pending plans for coal-fired power plants in Iowa near Waterloo and Marshalltown.” Awareness varies widely by region with 64 percent of those in the Cedar Rapids area (which includes Waterloo) knowing of such plan, 34 percent awareness in Des Moines (closer to Marshalltown) and only 22 percent in the rest of the state.
    * A third of respondents said that they will “definitely attend” or are “extremely likely” to attend a caucus, including 31 percent of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats.
    * 39 percent of the respondents were Republican/Independents leaning Republican, 47 percent were Democrats/Independents leaning Democratic, 37 percent were Independents, and 2 percent were associated with other parties.
    * About nine out of 10 respondents (89 percent) said they are registered to vote.

For full survey findings, go to http://plainsjustice.org/filings-for-marshalltown-iowa-coal-plant-proposal/ on the Web.

METHODOLOGY

Survey results are based on telephone interviews conducted among a representative sample of 1,005 adults aged 18 and over living in private households in Iowa. Interviewing was completed by Opinion Research Corporation during the period of December 7-11, 2007. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the complete sample of Iowa adults. Smaller sub-groups will have larger error margins.

ABOUT THE GROUPS

Iowa Interfaith Power & Light (http://www.ncrlc.com/IICEC.html) is part of a national network dedicated to protecting God’s sacred creation and safeguarding public health. Iowa Interfaith Power & Light has worked with more than 150 faith communities in Iowa to reduce global warming pollution while empowering those most impacted by higher energy costs, by increasing investment in energy efficiency and by creating new revenue streams through clean energy.

The Iowa Farmers Union (http://www.iafu.org) works to sustain and strengthen the family farm agricultural system in the United States through education, legislation and cooperation.

With headquarters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Plains Justice (http://www.plainsjustice.org) is a public interest environmental law center working for environmental justice and sustainable communities in the Northern Plains region of the U.S., including eastern Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa. The Plains Justice docket includes Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and energy policy work.

CONTACT: Ailis Aaron Wolf, (703) 276-3265, and aaaron@hastingsgroup.com.

EDITOR’S NOTE: A streaming audio recording of the news event will be available on the Web as of 7 p.m. CT/8 p.m. ET on December 20, 2007 at http://plainsjustice.org/filings-for-marshalltown-iowa-coal-plant-proposal/.

DFIA Events Calendar

Add Your Event Here

Iowa Sites

ABC Free

AFSCME Iowa

Algona Wind Farm

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Cyclones for Choice

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Central

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa Global Warming

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Opinion

Iowa Peace

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Policy Research

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

IOWATER

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media