|
||||
|
Open Thread Recent Articles
Search
BFIA Writer's Guidelines We welcome Submissions Login Sunlight Seeker
Daily Archive Recent Visitors
Sam Garchik - Mon 02 Jun 2008 10:10 AM CDT
atomburke - Fri 23 May 2008 03:49 PM CDT
salman - Fri 23 May 2008 06:28 AM CDT
megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT
|
Wednesday, December 20
by
Sam Garchik
on Wed 20 Dec 2006 09:05 AM CST
Educational Excellence and Picking a New President
By Art Small, Originally Printed in the CR Gazette Since the departure in June of David Skorton, who left the UI for the presidency at Cornell University, much attention has been focused on the matter of the search for a new president. Across the state, and certainly within the University community, it has been a major subject for discussion. Certainly having a quality president of the university is extremely important and almost every public figure of any note in Iowa has expressed an opinion on the subject. Less attention has been devoted to what is a more serious and less correctable problem: the serious under-funding of Iowa's three Universities. A new president will ultimately be found, even though the process by which that individual is selected probably will not meet with universal approval. That new president will be gratified to find Iowa's politicians quite willing to articulate strong support for higher education in the state. During the most recent campaign the state Democratic Chair said Iowa Democrats would "secure educational excellence" while "making college more affordable" and the Republican Chair said his party had "a positive vision to achieve world-class education" and would "strive to provide our children a world-class education." Further, both candidates for Governor promised to address the problem of ever higher tuition increases. Great sentiments. But when that newly selected president looks closer he or she will find a different and more difficult reality. The total sum appropriated for Iowa's Regents Universities in Governor Branstad's last year of office was $628,572,092. But for the past 5 years the amounts appropriated have been $16.5, $40, $54, $39 and $55 million below that amount. In addition, and making matters worse, during the eight years of Governor Vilsack's term the Consumer Price Index has risen over 18 percent and the Higher Education Price Index has jumped 27.8 percent. Also, during the same period, at the University of Iowa alone the number of undergraduates has increased 11 percent and the number of tenured and tenure track faculty has decreased 3.4 percent. To help make up for the shortfall, tuition and fees have been more than doubled. This certainly has not been a recipe for "world-class education." The new president will soon find the reality behind the political rhetoric is not pretty. Will the new Governor and new Legislature address this funding problem? Who knows? That issue has not been much discussed. It will take money, serious money. To find a new president the Regents simply have to get their act together and pick one. That shouldn't be all that difficult and there does appear to be an adequate supply of qualified candidates. But it will take a lot more effort to get the needed funding. Will the new Governor, the new Legislature and the new Regents have the desire or the will to be up to this more difficult challenge? In short, will they find a new recipe for the promised "world-class education"? Arthur A. Small Friday, December 8
by
Caroline Vernon
on Fri 08 Dec 2006 06:54 PM CST
IPP Report on Fixing Healthcare in Iowa
Iowa Policy Project senior research consultant Colin Gordon has issued a new report for the IPP, “Prescriptions and Placebos: Fixing Health Care in Iowa.” To view the report, see: <http://www.iowafiscal.org To view the executive summary, see: <http://www.iowafiscal.org To view the news release, see: <http://www.iowafiscal.org Below are links to a couple of the many media reports published or aired about Colin’s report: WHO Radio: Health Care Rx <http://www.whoradio.com/pages Quad-City Times: Expanded access to health care urged <http://www.qctimes.net/articles In the Cedar Rapids Gazette, James Lynch reported that Gordon “recommended ... that Iowa lawmakers scrap the ‘piecemeal’ approach they’ve used in recent years if their goal is health care coverage that is affordable, accessible and maintains a high level of quality.” From his story: ‘‘Our health care financing system does not work, and it’s understandable that state legislators see a need to step in,’’ said Gordon, a senior research consultant for the Iowa Policy Project and co-author of the report — Prescriptions and Placebos: Fixing Health Care in Iowa — for the non-partisan Iowa Fiscal Partnership. ‘‘They must be careful, however, to take a long-term view and not miss the underlying problem of spiraling health care costs.’’ We encourage your review of this new report as the Iowa General Assembly prepares to return to the Statehouse in January. Best regards, Mike Owen Assistant Director The Iowa Policy Project (319) 338-0773 Iowa City (319) 643-3628 West Branch ipp@Lcom.net Wednesday, December 6
by
Caroline Vernon
on Wed 06 Dec 2006 07:51 AM CST
People Party vs. Money Party: Who's Who Among the DemocratsBy David Sirota, AlterNet The fact that our nation's politics is divided not between Democrats and Republicans but between the People Party and the Money Party is obvious to anyone who looks at the political system honestly (which is to say, not most journalists or Washington political hacks). Calls for "bipartisanship" and faux "centrism" that has nothing to do with the actual center of American public opinion are most often moves to prevent the political debate from analyzing the People vs. Money divide that actually fuels our politics. We already have plenty of "bipartisanship" -- Republicans and a faction of Democrats who regularly join hands to screw over the vast majority of Americans. Many people ask me who? Who are the leading members of both sides of the actual divide? The answer is that there is no official list because no one is forced to formally declare their allegiance to the People Party or the Money Party. But it is fairly obvious which lawmakers in the new majority have specifically defined themselves on economic justice issues. Though this is by no means a comprehensive list, here are the ones to watch in the coming Congress: People Party Leaders Freshman Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Jon Tester (D-MT) and Jim Webb (D-VA): This is the core group of economic populists who defined the larger populist trend in the 2006 election. Brown has a long record in the House as an economic justice champion, as has Sanders (who I worked for years ago). Tester (pictured above from an event he did here in Helena last night) made his campaign about cleaning up K Street corruption, and Webb has declared that his top issue is going to be addressing the taboo issue of economic inequality. Sens. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL): Dorgan has been one of the strongest voices against profiteering by the energy and pharmaceutical companies, and has recently written a book called "Take This Job and Ship It," which is one of the strongest declarations against lobbyist-written trade deals from any sitting Senator in recent memory. Similarly, Feingold has voted against every major lobbyist-written trade deal that has come through the Senate, even airing campaign ads on the issue well before that kind of message became more popular. Kennedy, as the incoming chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee is expected to continue his rabid support for the People Party on nearly every economic issue. And Durbin, now the number two Democrat in the Senate, has also had a solid record on trade, and is additionally talking about pushing public financing of elections -- the most effective way to cut off K Street's ability to manipulate Congress. House Chairpeople George Miller (D-CA), David Obey (D-WI), John Conyers (D-MI), Louise Slaughter (D-NY) and Henry Waxman (D-CA): Miller will now head the Education and Workforce Committee where he is expected to turn his longtime leadership on pension security, wage protection and union organizing rights into legislative action. Obey, who will head the Appropriations Committee (and who I worked for a few years back), will make sure that any budget submitted by the White House that slashes health care, education and labor law enforcement will be dead on arrival, and replaced with a real spending plan that protects people (Obey was the guy who famously authored amendments to slash tax cuts for millionaires in order to better fund these priorities). Conyers will head the Judiciary Committee, which oversees all sorts of regulatory affairs where his pro-consumer record will finally have a chance to shine. Slaughter will chair the powerful Rules Committee -- the panel that governs how the entire chamber operates. She has been an outspoken leader against media consolidation -- one of the toughest issues to champion because the broadcasting industry is so powerful. And finally Waxman will head the Government Reform Committee, where we will now have a chairman who is serious about rooting out the waste, fraud and corruption that has plagued the no-bid Iraq contracts given to President Bush's cronies. Reps. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Tim Ryan (D-OH), Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Nancy Boyda (D-KS), and Bruce Braley (D-IA): Ohio's trio of Kaptur, Ryan and Kucinich have been among the staunchest critics of lobbyist-written trade pacts and advocates for the middle-class agenda in the House. Freshmen Boyda and Braley both ran their campaigns almost exclusively on the trade issue. In Braley's case, the Wall Street Journal noted that he made opposition to the Bush administration's free-trade agenda a centerpiece of his campaign" urging "more focus on labor rights in national trade policy and talked of using economic sanctions to keep America competitive." Money Party Leaders Sen. Chuck Schumer and Reps. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) and Steny Hoyer (D-MD): All three of these men, now in leadership positions, have made very little effort to conceal that they answer to Big Money interests. Schumer, for instance, recently trumpeted a new report calling for post-Enron corporate reforms to be gutted. Emanuel was the architect of NAFTA who used the prospect of his being in the majority on the Ways and Means Committee to suck corporate cash out of Wall Street. Hoyer bragged on his website about starting his own K Street Project, and, as I documented in Hostile Takeover, one of his top legislative staffers serves simultaneously as an official for his corporate fundraising operation -- 'nuff said. To read the rest of this article, click here: |
Iowa Sites Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa Genetic Engineering Action Network Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility Iowa Public Interest Research Group Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates Progressive Action for the Common Good Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT) Iowa Blogs The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities) Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog) Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections Political FalloutFight Iowa Rapid Response Network - Iowa
Iowans for Better Local TV
Air America
The Counterpoint
National FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Media Matters for America
|
||
|
||||