The Online Information Resource for Iowa's Progressive Community

Search

BFIA Writer's Guidelines

We welcome Submissions

Read Them On The Web

How To Post
A Comment On
BLOG FOR IOWA

Login

Username:
Password:
Remember me 
 

Subscribe to Democracyforiowa

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Sunlight Seeker

Look up national or state donors or check where your Congresspeople are getting their money.

Daily Archive

March 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

By Year

Recent Visitors

megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT 
Sam Garchik - Thu 08 May 2008 09:31 AM CDT 
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT 
jasongrandon23 - Thu 24 Apr 2008 09:26 PM CDT 
ChrisLedman - Tue 15 Apr 2008 07:45 AM CDT 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
View Article  County Convention Wrap-Up
County Convention Wrap-Up
By Sam Garchik

Pretty much Bleeding Heartland has links to some commentaries here.They are all good. Also, the IDP has final results here.

One more link to check out. Adam Burke, with Iowa Independent, did an awesome job of creating a video blog of the Johnson County Convention. Check it out here. At some point, I'm in the video trying to explain to some delegates how the process works.

One last comment/question. Did anyone else have to deal with some platform issues that were not germane to the process? Let me know...


View Article  Sign the petition to make sure Democratic voters decide our nominee, not the party elite
Sign the petition to make sure Democratic voters decide our nominee, not the party elite
BY DFA

This is an unprecedented year. Thirty-seven states and U.S. territories have already voted and we don't have a clear nominee. Senators Clinton and Obama are in a delegate race to the nomination.

There are a lot of ways that delegates get assigned to a specific candidate, but almost all of the allocated delegates are directly tied and bound by the actual votes in each primary or caucus -- all of them that is, except super-delegates.

Super-delegates are a contingent of almost 900 elected officials, party insiders, and current DNC members and they aren't required to follow the voters. In fact, after every Democrat has voted and the last allocated delegates are assigned, super-delegates have the power to overturn the popular vote and crown a different winner.

That's right, if super-delegates don't like who you choose to be our nominee, they can overturn your vote. We can't let that happen. Our nominee must be chosen by Democratic voters, not by back room deals of the party elite. Sign our petition now to let the voters decide:

www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/VotersDecide

We must respect the 20 million Democrats who have already voted and the millions more who will vote before the convention. It's up to us to make sure the almost 900 super-delegates do the right thing.

Sign the petition today and we'll deliver all of the signatures directly to super-delegates.

And this is just the beginning of our campaign to let the voters decide. The longer it takes to win, the more we'll escalate the campaign. We'll write letters, make calls, and hold media events. Because when it comes to protecting the will of Democratic primary voters, DFA members know exactly where we stand.

www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/VotersDecide

Thank you for taking action today.

-Charles

Charles Chamberlain
Political Director
View Article  Introducing the Super Delegates!
Introducing the Super Delegates!
By Sam Garchik

Sunday's Register says these folks are our Supers. Be sure to contact them to let them know how you stand on our party's nomination for Pres. With a close race, these folks still have lots of power to chose your candidate.

Clinton Supporters:
Leonard Boswell, Mike Gronstal, Sarah Swisher, and Sandy Opstvedt.

Obama Supporters:
Chet Culver, Mike Fitzgerald, and David Loebsack

Uncommitted:
Scott Brennan, Bruce Braley, Tom Harkin, and Richard Machacek

1 more will be selected at our state convention in June.

Once again, no body explains this  process better than Deeth.
View Article  Holy Primaries, Batman, It's still close! (And More from IVI)
Holy Primaries, Batman, It's still close! (And More from IVI)

By IVI

Cnn has Clinton at 783, and Obama at 709. Last night, some pundit said that a Clinton lead of 100 would be bad for Obama. It might, in fact, be even closer than you think! Well, he's got it down to 74. The Verified Voting struggle continues. This time, it's a letter from IVI to the gov..

February 5, 2008

The Honorable Chet Culver
Governor of the State of Iowa
State Capitol
Des Moines, IA 50319

Dear Governor Culver,
We write this morning to extend great thanks for your statements regarding optical scan voting systems on yesterday's Iowa Public Radio program “The Exchange.” Asked about the current discussion over new voting equipment for Iowa's counties, you observed that precinct-based optical scan systems are clearly the best form of voter-verifiable paper trail, and you expressed hope that counties move toward such a system by this November.  Thank you for moving the discussion forward.

We would respectfully urge you to agree to full state funding for the purchase of precinct-based optical scan technology.

When you advised Iowa's counties in 2005 to use their federal HAVA dollars to purchase systems with a voter-verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT), it was thought by most stakeholders that the VVPAT printers would be adequate to address the need for verifiable, recountable elections.  We have since learned that this is not the case. Even had all of Iowa's counties followed your good advice, we would still find ourselves in the same position we find ourselves today: looking for funds to establish a statewide system of precinct-based optical scan.

Other states that had the foresight to enact laws requiring voter-verifiable paper trails are moving in the direction of establishing universal optical scan systems, and with good reason.  The paper trail printers do not provide adequate protection to the voters' ballots.

The paper-trail printers have mechanical problems, and have lost votes in a number of recent elections. Most recently, in the November 2007 elections on Cleveland, Ohio's Cuyahoga County, 20 per cent of VVPAT printouts were unreadable. The risk of such a problem in an Iowa election is not acceptable.

In addition to mechanical problems, the printers are subject to manipulation. California Secretary of State Debra Bowen commissioned a top-to-bottom review of voting systems in 2007, and the findings by computer scientists who carried out the review show that the paper trail is not secure.. The VVPAT printers for the Premier touch screens, which are used in 71 counties, can be compromised with ease in less than a minute, and the ballots printed on them destroyed. Computer scientists commissioned by Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner found that printer jams can be created simply by pressing against the transparent casing of the printer, causing all records printed afterward to be unreadable.

For these reasons, states that already have paper trails are in the process of changing to precinct-based optical scan. California's Secretary of State Bowen has severely restricted the use of touch screens in today's primary, and has expressed a strong preference for optical scan. In January, Colorado's Governor Ritter and a bipartisan team of lawmakers announced a plan to advance legislation requiring precinct-based optical scan in the state this November. And following the printer problems last November, Ohio Secretary of State Brunner ordered Cuyahoga County to scrap its touch screens and adopt optical scan.

Federal legislation also provides incentive not to spend state funds on printers. Legislation now moving forward in Congress would offer reimbursement for the purchase of new optical scan equipment, but not for new VVPAT printers. If the state spends money on VVPAT, it will likely not see the money again. Incentives aside, there is also a strong possibility that Congress will ban the printers in the next several years.

In closing, we recognize that Iowa counties have historically been financially responsible for the conduct of elections. But we find ourselves with an extraordinary situation, in which a hastily created federal mandate has created with voting equipment that is simply not acceptable. The state could provide full funding for the purchase of optical scan systems, while making clear that this funding is a recognition of the unique present circumstances, rather than a relieving of long-standing county responsibilities.

Your view that precinct-based optical scan is the best voting system for Iowa is shared by the Secretary of State, and by leading lawmakers in both major parties. Full state funding is feasible, if the cost is borne over the next three years.  This moment of consensus offers Iowa a historic opportunity to create a uniform, first-rate voting system. It would be a tragedy for Iowa's voters if this opportunity slips away.  We ask for you to make a magnanimous exception to historical precedent, and approve funding for a voting system we all believe would best serve the voters of Iowa.

Sincerely,
Sean Flaherty
Carole Simmons
Co-Chairs, Iowans for Voting Integrity
www.IowansForVotingIntegrity.org

cc Jamie Cashman, James Larew
View Article  Edwards supporters still active
Edwards supporters still active

By Sam Garchik

John Deeth has this to say about Edwards supporters. As an Edwards alternate to the county convention in March, I will be interested to see how this all pans out. The rest of you?
View Article  How many former IDP staffers does it take to run a caucs?

How many former IDP staffers does it take to run a caucs?


By Sam Garchik

Apparently 3, but that's only if the state is Nevada, and only counting the ones that I recognize (Hessburg, Sime, and Brock). Let me know if I miscounted.

Stay tuned. NV Caucusing starts on Saturday!

View Article  Choose President with Rock, Paper, Scissors

Choose President with Rock, Paper, Scissors


By Ed Fallon

Zogby has Obama by 13 and McCain by 9 in NH. Stay tuned for results on Wednesday. Meanwhile, this from Fallon

I’ve heard lots of entertaining stories from this year’s Iowa Caucuses, but none beat the following.

In my caucus, a handful of Kucinich supporters were not viable.  I laid out my case why John Edwards should be their second choice.  A young gal explained her rationale for Obama.  After 20 minutes of haggling, a flustered Kucinichite threw up her hands and said their group would caucus for whichever candidate’s representative won a game of Rock, Paper, Scissors. 

So, like two gladiators, Obama’s champion and I strode forward to battle, best out of three.  I’d done a lot to prepare for this year’s caucus, but never imagined I’d have to hone my Rock, Paper, Scissors skills.  The alacrity of youth prevailed.  I lost, but our Edwards group remained viable, and the delegates were split evenly among Clinton, Obama and Edwards.

Quirky stories like this are the fun stuff caucus folklore is made of.  But the important message from this year’s event is the unprecedented turnout:  a record 239,000 Democrats, excited about the prospects for substantive, long-overdue change.  And the two candidates most perceived as advocates for change – John Edwards and Barack Obama – won 68% of the delegates.

Both in Iowa and nationally, the status quo is in trouble.  And it’s about time.  Americans are fed-up with lobbyists and corporations running the show.  They’re tired of watching the elite get richer while the rest of us struggle.  They’re dismayed at the growing ranks of the poor and uninsured, and the lack of attention to a host of looming environmental disasters.

Like never before, they’re pessimistic about the future.

Yet, like never before, they’re hopeful and energized.

I’m energized, too.  I’ve preached a progressive-populist message of reform since my first campaign for the Iowa Statehouse in 1992.  For a long time, it was a lonely place to be, as state and national Democratic candidates blabbed party-line pablum that was generic, vacuous and as inspiring as yesterday’s oatmeal. 

But that’s changing, and changing fast.  Our challenge is twofold.  First, we have to sort out the candidates who actually mean “change” from those who are just mouthing what pollsters tell them the public wants to hear.  Second, regardless of which candidate we supported in the Caucuses, we reformers have to band together.

United, we will be unstoppable!

Ed Fallon

DFIA Events Calendar

Add Your Event Here

Iowa Sites

ABC Free

AFSCME Iowa

Algona Wind Farm

Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa

Cyclones for Choice

Environment Iowa

Eyechanner Foundation

Genetic Engineering Action Network

Iowa Bicycle Coalition

Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

Iowa Civil Liberties Union

Iowa Democratic Party

Iowa Energy Center

Iowa Environmental Council

Iowa Farmers Union

Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO

Iowa Fiscal Central

Iowans for Better Local TV

Iowa for Health Care

Iowa Freecycle

Iowa Global Warming

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Opinion

Iowa Peace

Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility

Iowa PIRG

Iowa Policy Project

Iowa Policy Research

Iowa Pride Network

Iowa Public Interest Research Group

IOWATER

Iowa Underground

Iowans for Voting Integrity

Left Coast of Iowa

Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates

Progressive Action for the Common Good

Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa

QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT)

Rapid Response - Iowa

SEIU Local 199

Sierra Club - Iowa Chapter

Soypower - West Central Soy

Voter-owned Iowa

Iowa Blogs

Bleeding Heartland

BlogNetNews Iowa

The Caucus Cooler

Century of the Common Iowan

The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities)

Diary of a Political Madman

Empire Falls Blog

Essential Estrogen

From Right to Left

Gavin's Journal

Green Tea Blog

Iowa Ennui

Iowa House Democrats

Iowa Independent

Iowa Liberal

Iowa Progress

Iowa Rapid Response

Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog)

Iowa Underground

Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Jedi Tony

John Deeth's Blog

Krusty Konservative

Left Coast of Iowa Blog

Leftist Logic

Marshall County Democrats

Nick Johnson's Blog

Nussle and Flow

Political Fallout

Mike Palecek

Political Forecast

Politics in Iowa

Kay Henderson and Radio Iowa

The Rural Populist

Small Town Fun

Smoky Hollow

Southwest Iowa Guy

State 29

Steve King Watch

Straight Out of the Cornfield

Fight
Media Bias

Iowa

Rapid Response Network - Iowa

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage


Iowans for Better Local TV

*IBLTV is a group of citizens from the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids area who are concerned about the decline in the quality of local television. Fight local media consolidation, as it leads to an unaccountable medium that enriches itself while disregarding the need to serve the public good.


Air America

*How to Bring Air America Radio to Your Local Community


The Counterpoint

*The rational counter to 'The Point,' 'The Counterpoint' critiques and corrects the daily editorial by Sinclair Broadcasting's corporate vice president, Mark Hyman, that is broadcast on all Sinclair-owned television stations across the country


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Media Matters for America

*Media Matters for America is an information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media