|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Open Thread Recent Articles
Search
BFIA Writer's Guidelines We welcome Submissions Login Sunlight Seeker
Daily Archive
Recent Visitors
megelso - Sun 11 May 2008 09:10 AM CDT
Sam Garchik - Thu 08 May 2008 09:31 AM CDT
no4gman - Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:07 AM CDT
jasongrandon23 - Thu 24 Apr 2008 09:26 PM CDT
ChrisLedman - Tue 15 Apr 2008 07:45 AM CDT
|
Monday, March 17
by
Sam Garchik
on Mon 17 Mar 2008 08:36 AM CDT
County Convention Wrap-Up
By Sam Garchik Pretty much Bleeding Heartland has links to some commentaries here.They are all good. Also, the IDP has final results here. One more link to check out. Adam Burke, with Iowa Independent, did an awesome job of creating a video blog of the Johnson County Convention. Check it out here. At some point, I'm in the video trying to explain to some delegates how the process works. One last comment/question. Did anyone else have to deal with some platform issues that were not germane to the process? Let me know... Friday, February 15
by
Sam Garchik
on Fri 15 Feb 2008 09:40 AM CST
Sign the petition to make sure Democratic voters decide our nominee, not the party elite
BY DFA This is an unprecedented year. Thirty-seven states and U.S. territories have already voted and we don't have a clear nominee. Senators Clinton and Obama are in a delegate race to the nomination. There are a lot of ways that delegates get assigned to a specific candidate, but almost all of the allocated delegates are directly tied and bound by the actual votes in each primary or caucus -- all of them that is, except super-delegates. Super-delegates are a contingent of almost 900 elected officials, party insiders, and current DNC members and they aren't required to follow the voters. In fact, after every Democrat has voted and the last allocated delegates are assigned, super-delegates have the power to overturn the popular vote and crown a different winner. That's right, if super-delegates don't like who you choose to be our nominee, they can overturn your vote. We can't let that happen. Our nominee must be chosen by Democratic voters, not by back room deals of the party elite. Sign our petition now to let the voters decide: www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/VotersDecide We must respect the 20 million Democrats who have already voted and the millions more who will vote before the convention. It's up to us to make sure the almost 900 super-delegates do the right thing. Sign the petition today and we'll deliver all of the signatures directly to super-delegates. And this is just the beginning of our campaign to let the voters decide. The longer it takes to win, the more we'll escalate the campaign. We'll write letters, make calls, and hold media events. Because when it comes to protecting the will of Democratic primary voters, DFA members know exactly where we stand. www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/VotersDecide Thank you for taking action today. -Charles Charles Chamberlain Political Director Monday, February 11
by
Sam Garchik
on Mon 11 Feb 2008 06:00 AM CST
Introducing the Super Delegates!
By Sam Garchik Sunday's Register says these folks are our Supers. Be sure to contact them to let them know how you stand on our party's nomination for Pres. With a close race, these folks still have lots of power to chose your candidate. Clinton Supporters: Leonard Boswell, Mike Gronstal, Sarah Swisher, and Sandy Opstvedt. Obama Supporters: Chet Culver, Mike Fitzgerald, and David Loebsack Uncommitted: Scott Brennan, Bruce Braley, Tom Harkin, and Richard Machacek 1 more will be selected at our state convention in June. Once again, no body explains this process better than Deeth. Wednesday, February 6
by
Sam Garchik
on Wed 06 Feb 2008 11:14 AM CST
Holy Primaries, Batman, It's still close! (And More from IVI)
By IVI Cnn has Clinton at 783, and Obama at 709. Last night, some pundit said that a Clinton lead of 100 would be bad for Obama. It might, in fact, be even closer than you think! Well, he's got it down to 74. The Verified Voting struggle continues. This time, it's a letter from IVI to the gov.. February 5, 2008 The Honorable Chet Culver Governor of the State of Iowa State Capitol Des Moines, IA 50319 Dear Governor Culver, We write this morning to extend great thanks for your statements regarding optical scan voting systems on yesterday's Iowa Public Radio program “The Exchange.” Asked about the current discussion over new voting equipment for Iowa's counties, you observed that precinct-based optical scan systems are clearly the best form of voter-verifiable paper trail, and you expressed hope that counties move toward such a system by this November. Thank you for moving the discussion forward. We would respectfully urge you to agree to full state funding for the purchase of precinct-based optical scan technology. When you advised Iowa's counties in 2005 to use their federal HAVA dollars to purchase systems with a voter-verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT), it was thought by most stakeholders that the VVPAT printers would be adequate to address the need for verifiable, recountable elections. We have since learned that this is not the case. Even had all of Iowa's counties followed your good advice, we would still find ourselves in the same position we find ourselves today: looking for funds to establish a statewide system of precinct-based optical scan. Other states that had the foresight to enact laws requiring voter-verifiable paper trails are moving in the direction of establishing universal optical scan systems, and with good reason. The paper trail printers do not provide adequate protection to the voters' ballots. The paper-trail printers have mechanical problems, and have lost votes in a number of recent elections. Most recently, in the November 2007 elections on Cleveland, Ohio's Cuyahoga County, 20 per cent of VVPAT printouts were unreadable. The risk of such a problem in an Iowa election is not acceptable. In addition to mechanical problems, the printers are subject to manipulation. California Secretary of State Debra Bowen commissioned a top-to-bottom review of voting systems in 2007, and the findings by computer scientists who carried out the review show that the paper trail is not secure.. The VVPAT printers for the Premier touch screens, which are used in 71 counties, can be compromised with ease in less than a minute, and the ballots printed on them destroyed. Computer scientists commissioned by Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner found that printer jams can be created simply by pressing against the transparent casing of the printer, causing all records printed afterward to be unreadable. For these reasons, states that already have paper trails are in the process of changing to precinct-based optical scan. California's Secretary of State Bowen has severely restricted the use of touch screens in today's primary, and has expressed a strong preference for optical scan. In January, Colorado's Governor Ritter and a bipartisan team of lawmakers announced a plan to advance legislation requiring precinct-based optical scan in the state this November. And following the printer problems last November, Ohio Secretary of State Brunner ordered Cuyahoga County to scrap its touch screens and adopt optical scan. Federal legislation also provides incentive not to spend state funds on printers. Legislation now moving forward in Congress would offer reimbursement for the purchase of new optical scan equipment, but not for new VVPAT printers. If the state spends money on VVPAT, it will likely not see the money again. Incentives aside, there is also a strong possibility that Congress will ban the printers in the next several years. In closing, we recognize that Iowa counties have historically been financially responsible for the conduct of elections. But we find ourselves with an extraordinary situation, in which a hastily created federal mandate has created with voting equipment that is simply not acceptable. The state could provide full funding for the purchase of optical scan systems, while making clear that this funding is a recognition of the unique present circumstances, rather than a relieving of long-standing county responsibilities. Your view that precinct-based optical scan is the best voting system for Iowa is shared by the Secretary of State, and by leading lawmakers in both major parties. Full state funding is feasible, if the cost is borne over the next three years. This moment of consensus offers Iowa a historic opportunity to create a uniform, first-rate voting system. It would be a tragedy for Iowa's voters if this opportunity slips away. We ask for you to make a magnanimous exception to historical precedent, and approve funding for a voting system we all believe would best serve the voters of Iowa. Sincerely, Sean Flaherty Carole Simmons Co-Chairs, Iowans for Voting Integrity www.IowansForVotingIntegrity.org cc Jamie Cashman, James Larew Friday, February 1
by
Sam Garchik
on Fri 01 Feb 2008 08:43 AM CST
Edwards supporters still active
By Sam Garchik John Deeth has this to say about Edwards supporters. As an Edwards alternate to the county convention in March, I will be interested to see how this all pans out. The rest of you? Friday, January 18
by
Sam Garchik
on Fri 18 Jan 2008 07:00 AM CST
How many former IDP staffers does it take to run a caucs? By Sam Garchik Apparently 3, but that's only if the state is Nevada, and only counting the ones that I recognize (Hessburg, Sime, and Brock). Let me know if I miscounted. Stay tuned. NV Caucusing starts on Saturday! Tuesday, January 8
by
Sam Garchik
on Tue 08 Jan 2008 07:48 AM CST
Choose President with Rock, Paper, Scissors By Ed Fallon Zogby has Obama by 13 and McCain by 9 in NH. Stay tuned for results on Wednesday. Meanwhile, this from Fallon |
Iowa Sites Child & Family Policy Center - Iowa Genetic Engineering Action Network Iowa Citizen Action Network - ICAN Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO Iowa Physicians for Social Responsibility Iowa Public Interest Research Group Midwest Environmental Justice Advocates Progressive Action for the Common Good Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa QCAD (Quad-Citians Affirming Diversity - GLBT) Iowa Blogs The Deprogrammer (Quad Cities) Iowa True Blue (Gordon Fischer's Blog) Iowa Voters for Open and Transparent Elections Political FalloutFight Iowa Rapid Response Network - Iowa
Iowans for Better Local TV
Air America
The Counterpoint
National FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Media Matters for America
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||