Archive for August 1, 2011
Monday – Thursday from 7:00-800 pm, join us for the fusion of politics and civility at 98.3 WOW-FM and
on-line at 983wowfm.com. Call (515) 312-0983 or (866) 908-TALK to participate in the conversation. If you miss the show, you can hear it as a podcast and please help support local progressive talk radio with a donation through Pay
Pal or by check to PO Box 13421, Des Moines, IA 50310.
Monday, we’ll cover a bunch of ground with State Rep Ako Abdul-Samad. I’m interested in his take on the state budget and the possibility of a special session. There’s talk of bringing the Legislature back to override Governor Branstad’s veto of a tax break for the poor and of legislation to keep 36 unemployment offices open. Those positive changes were supported by Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike. But will Republicans have the guts to stand up to Branstad?
Tuesday, David Osterberg with the Iowa Policy Project shares research showing that Iowa’s budget is not out of control, as some allege. In fact, the budget is smaller now than what it was in the 1990s. Branstad’s insistence on corporate tax breaks to benefit the likes of Wal-Mart and McDonald’s while vetoing the Earned Income Tax Credit indicates a Governor severely out of touch with the lives of most Iowans.
Wednesday, Jake Velie with Healthy for Life discusses America’s growing obesity problem. Recent reports show that America’s waistline continues to add girth every year. This despite Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity “Let’s Move” campaign. Of course, it doesn’t help that Republicans in Congress have come out against curbing junk food marketing aimed at children.
Thursday, Kim Houlding with Story County Veterinary Clinic discusses the challenges facing the chicken industry. My question is, should chicken production even be an “industry,” or would Americans and America’s farmers best be served by hundreds of thousands of small producers?
So, tune in at 98.3 WOW-FM and online. You can download the Fallon Forum as a podcast, too. Thanks!
by Nicholas Johnson
The following is an excerpt. The entire article can be found here
In an [October 2010] interview with the National Journal [the Republican U.S. Senate Majority Leader] Senator [Mitch] McConnell was asked what “the job” of Republicans will be if they gain a majority in Congress. McConnell’s response was,
This was scarcely a casual slip of the tongue. “Let Me Repeat; Regrets? Not a One,” National Journal (“Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell will deliver a speech at the Heritage Foundation that reiterates why making President Obama a one-term president is the GOP’s top priority.”).
Although the National Journal article containing the initial interview with McConnell does not appear to be available to the public on the magazine’s Web site, the quote has been widely reported… link link link
Nor is the mission limited to this one Republican leader….Congresswoman Michelle Backman, has declared “Rep. Bachmann looks forward to working with the Governor [of Alaska, Sarah Palin] for the common goal of making sure President Obama is a one-term President.” Elspeth Reeve, “Palin Rivalry Becomes Bachmann Campaign Strategy.”
At a minimum, the Republicans’ acknowledgement of their “most important thing” calls into question every statement made by the Republican leadership, every legislative proposal, every vote they call for, every filibuster they threaten, every meeting they walk out of, and every charge they level at President Obama. Is it driven by the substance involved, or is it just another tactic in their strategy of presidential failure?
Am I charging some Republicans with a literal violation of our prohibitions of “treason”? No, of course not. Why “of course”? Because Article III, Section 3, of our Constitution was deliberately drafted to define “treason” much more narrowly than its dictionary definition. The Constitution declares that “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” From inside the White House, the Republicans’ shelling may sound and feel like “war,” but it’s not what the Constitution’s drafters had in mind.
No, I am speaking of “treason” in its more general dictionary usage:
1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
Synonyms 1. Treason, sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one’s country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense.”
At the outset, there is something troubling about candidates for federal office running against “government” — as Grover Norquist puts it, “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
I certainly support efforts to review government expenditures — as I did as U.S. Maritime Administrator….But to refuse to provide a clean increase in the debt ceiling, as we’ve routinely done dozens of times before, to insist on cutting food, medical and other benefits for the poor, to refuse to ask for a dime’s worth of increased revenue from the wealthy, and to be willing to bring down the global economy and the full faith and credit of the United States for the first time in over 200 years — all in the cause of defeating an incumbent president — does qualify, it seems to me, under the dictionary (though not the constitutional) definition of treason.
Hopefully, the American people will reflect on the Republicans’ behavior this past two and one-half years, and we’ll be rid of the lot by November of 2012.
— Nicholas Johnson teaches at the University of Iowa College of Law. Check out his website at nicholasjohnson.org.