Archive for September 2010
Democracy for America National Day of Action
Democracy for America National Day of Action Saturday 10.02.10
DemocracyforAmerica.com
This Saturday, October 2, DFA members from across the country are coming together for our National Day of Action — a one-day event mobilizing thousands of activists to contact tens of thousands of voters across the country.
But we can't do it without your help. Join our National Day of Action and we'll connect you with DFA leaders in your area to help support local campaigns and elect candidates that work for the people and not corporations.
Join a National Day of Action event in Iowa and help elect a progressive majority.
We're kicking things off with Congressman Alan Grayson, DFA Chair Jim Dean and Grassroots All-Star Beth Krom as part of a national online rally and conference call at 1 p.m. Eastern Time.
Jim will be calling in live from the One Nation Working Together rally in Washington DC where attendees will take time to make calls to voters as part of the Day of Action.
After the call, we're going to work for progressive candidates like Tarryl Clark in Minnesota and Joe Garcia in Florida. Up here in Vermont, DFA staff members are volunteering for gubernatorial candidate Peter Shumlin.
No matter who you volunteer for this weekend, we need you to volunteer. Tea Party Republicans are working to destroy Social Security, make tax cuts for the rich permanent and empower corporate interests like never before. If they win, it will be like Bush-Cheney all over again. Maybe worse.
The only way to beat them is with people power, so sign up to join a Day of Action event today.
We're barely one month out from Election Day. Join us this weekend and help elect candidates who will fight for us.
Matt Blizek, Field Director
Democracy for America
Democracy for America relies on you and the people-power of more than one million members to fund the grassroots organizing and training that delivers progressive change on the issues that matter. Please Contribute Today and support our mission.
One Nation Working Together- 03 Days To 10.02.10
One Nation Working Together – 03 Days To 10.02.10
onenationworkingtogether.org
On October 2, 2010, tens of thousands of people will march in solidarity at the Nation's Capitol in order to protect our jobs, our education and our economy. Sign up to become part of One Nation Working Together.
We are putting America back to work and pulling America back together.
Be a part of our march on October 2, 2010 in Washington, D.C. — one of the biggest progressive demonstrations in decades.
Whether you’ll be in Washington with us or not, add your voice to the movement for unity.
Iowans Can't Let Republicans Back in Power
Iowans Can't Let Republicans Back in Power
by Dave Bradley
Are you tired? I know I am.
Are you burned out yet? I think I am close.
Are you going to quit? You damn well better not! I know I won’t! And most importantly I know Roxanne and Chet and Dave and Bruce and Leonard and Matt Campbell and Bill Maske and Michael Mauro and Tom Miller and Francis Thicke and Jon Murphy will not quit.
And all the Democratic state senate and state representative candidates will not quit. And those running for county courthouse positions will not quit.
We only have a month to go. Voters have not really seemed to have become engaged as yet. As one candidate told me, they don’t care until the baseball playoffs start. I think that is more true this year than it has ever been. So now is the time to take on a little more energy and hit it harder.
It is much like we are going into our own playoffs starting now. Republicans claim that they will be the beneficiary of a “throw the bums out” cycle.
But I know a secret that they don’t. Voters like Republicans much less than Democrats. And when it comes to issues such as health care, jobs, education, the environment and on down the line voters side with us usually with a 55% majority or better.
So why would this be such a tough election? Two simple things: Media ownership and corporate money.
Fox “News” is a 24X7X365 Republican organ. Gee, I wonder how much that is in dollars of free advertisement? If they were the only one we could battle it, but they are just the loudest and most obnoxious. Rather than list television media that is sympathetic to right wing causes, it is much easier to list television that is liberal: 3 shows on MSNBC and FreeSpeechTV and LinkTV – the last two of which most have never even heard of.
Radio has been estimated as 90% right wing leaning. No argument here. Framing and language in a story can often create a picture in a listener’s mind that then becomes the prism through which other stories are viewed. The AP, CNN and even NPR often use the language that Fox News has made the common terms for many issues.
But here is the beauty. Despite being nearly frozen out of television and radio, we still win on issues. If TV and radio ever approached anything resembling balance, I would like to think it would kill the Republicans.
And the money in campaigns is certainly going to favor Republicans this year, especially after Republicans killed the DISCLOSE Act that was meant to fix the second worst Supreme Court decision ever. But I firmly believe that especially in Iowa the smell of all that money will actually create a stench that Republicans won’t be able to shake.
So get a good night’s rest. And then tomorrow think of what is at stake – things like keeping Republican hands off our treasury, keeping public schools open and Social Security and Medicare alive, bringing jobs back home from overseas, making sure the recovery continues and sustains. You know what I am saying.
Republicans damn near destroyed this country just a couple of years ago, we owe it to our friends, neighbors, children, grandchildren and even more, future generations to not let Republicans back in power to finish what they started.
Consult your county auditor for details or
Go to IowaDemocrats.org to find out where and how to vote early in your county.
Then head down to your county Dem HQ and volunteer some time to help elect Democrats. You can find contact information for your Democratic county chair here.
~Dave Bradley is a self-described
retired observer of American politics “trying to figure out how we got
so screwed up.” An
Iowa City native currently living in West Liberty, Dave and his wife
Carol have two grown children who “sadly had to leave the state to find
decent paying jobs.”
Iowa Progressive Radio: This Week On The Fallon Forum
Iowa
Progressive Radio: This Week On The Fallon Forum
Monday -Thursday from 7:00-800 pm, join us for the fusion of politics
and civility at 98.3 WOW-FM and
on-line at 983wowfm.com.
Call (515) 312-0983 or (866) 908-TALK to participate in the
conversation. If you miss the show, you can hear it as a podcast and please
help support local progressive talk radio with a donation through Pay
Pal or by check to PO Box 13421, Des Moines, IA 50310.
Monday on The Fallon Forum we talk with Dr. Charles Goldman about Net Neutrality. This is arguably one of the most important issues facing America when it comes to freedom of speech and the democratic process. We'll share a clip from Glenn Beck, who never met a lie he couldn't deliver with a straight face.
Tuesday, as President Obama lands in Des Moines, we discuss his recent Q & A session before a live MSNBC audience.
Wednesday, we'll talk either about the Republicans' Pledge to America, or the Governor's race in Iowa, or the battle over whether to retain the three Iowa Supreme Court judges on the ballot. Yeah, I just think it's fun sometimes to keep our audience guessing.
Thursday, Donna Buell, an attorney and board member of both the local and national Sierra Club, joins us to discuss environmental concerns in advance of the Sierra Club's annual meeting in Des Moines on October 1st.
Consult your county auditor for details at sos.state.ia.us/elections/auditors/auditorslist.html
Culver To Johnson County Dems: “We're gonna win… I don't care what the pollsters say”
Culver To Johnson County Dems: “We're gonna win… I don't care what the pollsters say”
by Trish Nelson
Today the Johnson County Democrats held their annual fall fundraiser and Governor Culver, Dave Loebsack, Michael Mauro, Sue Dvorsky, Tom Miller, Francis Thicke, and the full slate of Johnson County electeds were fired up and ready to go.
Deeth's blog: “'In
35 days we're gonna win this election,' he told Johnson County
Democrats gathered for the county party's annual fall barbecue. 'I don't
care what the pollsters say, I believe in you, the voters.' (These
particular voters, perhaps; the state's Democratic stronghold gave
Culver 68 percent support four years ago.)“
Blog for Iowa was there enjoying the day before hunkering down and spending October in campaign mode. Here we are with the Guv!
Dick Meyers was there to take no prisoners and pass the hat. He recalled when Governor Vilsack was 20 points behind Lightfoot at the 32-day mark.
Sue Dvorsky, Iowa Democratic Party chair, delivered one of the finest fired-up-ready-to-go speeches I've heard.
All of the speakers emphasized that the stakes are high in this
election, and much will depend on Johnson County getting out the
Democratic vote.
My representative, Mary Mascher spoke of the importance of voting early. She asked everyone present who had voted already to raise hands, and it seemed like about a third of the crowd had already voted.
Here's the Johnson County electeds.
Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller's message was simple: “Elections matter.” Indeed.
So, now is the time to head down to your county Dem HQ and volunteer some time to help elect Democrats. You can find contact information for your Democratic county chair here.
Go to IowaDemocrats.org to find out where and how to vote early in your county.
Politicizing Retention of Iowa Judges
Politicizing Retention of Iowa Judges
“The campaign to ouster three Iowa Supreme Court Justices to protect what some call “traditional family” is based on a Rube Goldberg contraption of logic that defies common sense.“
Who heard of most of the judges listed in the back side of this year's ballots? On our local ballot there were fourteen of them and for everyday citizens who work hard and play by the rules, rarely are they familiar names. In fact, more than a third of people who fill out a ballot do not cast a vote in the judicial retention section.
This year, a conservative group intends to politicize the process and make the three supreme court justices up for retention in the general election better known. The justices, David Baker, Michael Streit and Marsha Ternus woke conservatives by joining the unanimous opinion in Varnum v. Brien in 2009. Some conservatives say say they should not be retained in this year's general election. The three judges have decided to refrain from campaigning.
Iowa for Freedom, headed by three time unsuccessful gubernatorial candidate Bob Vander Plaats, recently televised an advertisement that begins, “Activist Judges on Iowa's Supreme Court have become political, ignoring the will of voters…” Last time we checked, what Iowans want is supreme court justices who interpret the law and keep the politics suggested by the “will of voters” out of judicial opinions as much as possible. There is no indication that Baker, Streit and Ternus have done anything but that.
The catalyst for this surge in interest in the supreme court justice election was Varnum v. Brien. The decision affirmed a ruling by a lower court that the Defense of Marriage Act signed by Governor Branstad limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman was unconstitutional. If one reads the 69 page opinion, what we find is that the justices considered almost every aspect of law related to marriage. That some are unhappy about the decision is not surprising, but no injustice appears to have been done.
Iowa, like 15 other states, uses what is called the “merit system” to select judges. The intent of the “merit system” is to remove judges from politics as much as is possible. Candidate for Governor Terry Branstad has indicated that he would eliminate the merit system and move to the Governor appointing justices and then seeking confirmation in the Iowa State Senate. If Branstad wins in November, it would add another layer of politicization to the judicial appointment process. It is ironic that Branstad appointed two of the three supreme court justices Vander Plaats would ouster.
Iowa for Freedom supports “traditional families.” Current social trends have all families under pressure. The divorce rate for first marriages in the United States is running at about 50%, with divorce rates for second marriages at 67% and for third marriages at 74%. In April 2009, the National Center for Health Statistics announced that nearly 40% of the babies born in the United States in 2007 were born out of wedlock. In the post-Reagan era, there has been a continual assault on the middle class with outsourcing of jobs, low cost manufacturing in Southeast Asia and a government that supports the profitability of corporations, who have an increasingly global footprint, more than citizens. Family life as we may remember it has changed and the change is permanent whether they are “traditional” or normal.
The campaign to ouster three Iowa Supreme Court Justices to protect what some call “traditional family” is based on a Rube Goldberg contraption of logic that defies common sense. Ouster judges we don't like, elect a Governor who will change the rules and appoint conservative activist judges, stack the Senate so conservative activist judges will be confirmed, do this until there are enough conservative activist judges for a majority and have the majority of conservative activist judges make rulings to match the “will of the people.” This process is the essence of making simple tasks overly complex and seems destined to crash and burn.
The Blog for Iowa view: vote to retain the three judges and elect Democrats. Progressives have a better chance of success with this nine word goal than do adherents to the convoluted logic of Vander Plaats. If we retain these judges and elect Democrats, life in society will be better for a middle class that includes progressives and conservatives alike.
~Paul
Deaton is a native Iowan living in rural Johnson County and weekend
editor of Blog for Iowa. E-mail Paul
Deaton
Is IPTV Cable News Lite? Iowa Press Fails 2nd District Voters in Loebsack/Miller-Meeks Interview
Is IPTV Cable News Lite? Iowa Press Fails 2nd District Voters in Loebsack/Miller-Meeks Interview
by Trish Nelson
Last night on IPTV's Iowa Press, 2nd District Congressman Dave Loebsack and challenger Mariannette Miller-Meeks were guests.
Watching it, I was dismayed and frustrated by the interviewers' opening series of questions about the race instead of the issues. Using corporate media talking points and reiterating invented media narratives, they tried (unsuccessfully) to press Congressman Loebsack about the so-called alleged “enthusiasm gap” and wanted to know if he had a fear of being identified as part of the “establishment” that “people are tired of” – as if this is a proven fact. Not mentioning the actual fact that Democrats are beating the GOP in absentee ballot requests, the interviewers O. Kay Henderson, Dean Borg, and James Lynch, seemed intent upon sticking with cliches rather than asking questions that would enlighten and inform the public about the issues at stake in the election.
To illustrate, check out this question from O. Kay Henderson re: health care reform:
Using the word “unpopular” four times for one question, Henderson claims this is a “proven fact” twice, and adds in the buzzword “enthusiastic” just in case she didn't use enough media cliches in one sentence. [Editor's note: According to Pew Research, the more media coverage the health care bill got, the more confused about its benefits people became...see Pew Research on Health Care Reform Coverage Validates Need for Media Reform].
Borg picks up the bogus theme and Loebsack displays his talent (probably after years of teaching undergrads) for finding positive, sensible responses to lame questions.
Loebsack: As a matter of fact, I have talked about my vote for the healthcare bill. We had a forum in Coralville and I'm proud of the vote that I took on the healthcare bill because of the reasons I've cited and many other reasons. So, clearly this is something that I think was the right thing to do for Iowa, for Iowans in the second district and indeed for the country.
This next exchange between Dean Borg and Loebsack, is another great example, in my view, of how even neutral journalists adopt assumptions that are repeated throughout the media, with no basis. Congressman Loebsack declines to try and answer an unanswerable question here, and instead appropriately points out his priorities as a congressman. Not to be denied though, Borg makes a second, failed, attempt to talk about this “anti-establishment” idea. Why the interviewers think these are necessary or even interesting questions, is completely beyond me.
Loebsack: Well, I have to tell you, Dean, I'm far less concerned about sort of the dynamics of the race, if you will, than I am about making sure that I'm back home every single weekend for the extended district work periods, making sure I'm talking to as many people in the district as I possibly can.
Borg: But do you have a fear against being identified as being part of the establishment that people are tired of?
Loebsack: Well, I wouldn't be surprised if some people feel that way but, again, my concern is to make sure that I'm in the district every single weekend, that I'm doing the right things for the people of the second district and I’m representing the people of the second district and that is my focus.
BFIA to IPTV: What defines an “establishment” candidate is that candidate being supportive of the status-quo. You're not an “establishment” candidate just because you happen to already hold office. But I guess there is just no place for nuance in today's journalism.
Speaking of no place for nuance, there also is apparently no place for details:
No details! Because we would not want to add any depth of understanding to a discussion of the issues! It must've been a slip, that she actually said it out loud.
Here's another one: James Lynch uses “enthusiasm gap” or “lack of enthusiasm” three times in one question, and is also able to slip in “anti-incumbent.”
It is understandable that candidates try to stay on message, repeating the same point that they want to emphasize, but why would reporters need to do this?
The interviewers made repeated attempts to get Loebsack to be apologetic about the health care bill. Congressman Loebsack had to say more than once that he was proud of passing health care reform.
But it wasn't all one-sided. Miller-Meeks was asked what made her a legitimate candidate, seeing as how she lacks money. While she may not be favored to win, or perhaps has no chance to win, not having as much money as your challenger does not de-legitimize your candidacy, and I really wish they would quit that line of questioning. How much sense does it make to invite a candidate on the program and then ask questions implying that that same candidate is not legitimate?
After wasting about half of the show pushing corporate media sound bytes, they gave it up, as Loebsack diligently stayed on message, declining to waste precious air time being silly. His response to every cable-news style question put to him was essentially, “I'm most concerned about doing the right thing for the people of the second District and making decisions that will benefit the people of Iowa. That is what they want me to do, and that is what I care most about.” Eventually, the ace reporters moved on.
To give credit where credit is due, the interviewers did get around to asking questions about issues, touching on don't ask-don't tell, the GOP's Pledge to America, floods, earmarks, and eggs, but there was very little time left. When Miller-Meeks tried to accuse the congressman of being disingenous about the war in Afghanistan, saying he had said he was “completely against the war in Afghanistan,” Borg didn't let her get away with it, pointing out that the Congressman never said that. He appropriately asked Loebsack if what she said was true, and Loebsack simply responded, “No, it is not.” No defensiveness, no explaining, the message being, her transparent attempt to mislead deserves no more of a response than that, and voters can decide for themselves or look it up.
For her part, Miller-Meeks seemed to be pandering to the independent vote and yes, even the left. She tried to act like the health care bill was faulty because it didn't achieve universal coverage! As if she would have been for universal coverage and would have gone against the rest of the GOP to work for it? Seems unlikely.
She also tried to blame Loebsack for the recession, pointing out that when he took office the unemployment figures were lower than they are now, two completely unrelated facts.
Congressman Loebsack, true to form, wisely used his time to say as much as he could (as fast as he could because there was virtually no time), about what he has done for the people of the second District while in office. Here are some of his remarks.
…While earmarks constitute only about one percent of the budget so long as we have earmarks I'm going to do everything I can, as Senator Grassley does, to make sure that Iowa gets its fair share. If I had not done that we wouldn't have had the $182 million committed to the new federal courthouse in Cedar Rapids and if I had not done that we wouldn't be doing any number of other projects around the district. Rockwell, for example, wouldn't be developing a new generation of handheld GPS receivers for the war fighter in the field. I'm proud of the investments that I have been able to obtain for the second district of Iowa.
When it comes to flood recovery obviously we can do much better than what has happened up until this point, especially getting the money that has been allocated to the people who need it. Now, when the flood happened in 2008 and the second district of Iowa suffered over half of the damage of the whole state of Iowa I felt that I had to be a leader in the house delegation on a bipartisan basis to make sure that we got the money that we need in the state of Iowa and that is something that I have done since the June 13th crest, obviously, and I've worked as hard as I can to bring as much of that funding here to the state of Iowa and to make sure it gets to where it is supposed to go.”
But don't believe me. Check it out for yourself. The program will air again on Sunday morning on Iowa Public Television at 11:30 a.m. Or you can view the video at IPTV.org



