Christie Vilsack for Congress
Follow BFIA on Twitter
Blog for Iowa Archives
Blog for Iowa Categories
Search BFIA by Date
February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

Fight Media Bias

Iowa

Iowa Rapid Response Action

First responders to biased, imbalanced or factually inaccurate media coverage

Iowans for Better Local TV


National

FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

*FAIR is a national media watch group that offers well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship


Free Press

News Corpse

Prometheus Radio Project

Radio for People

Save the Internet

Save the News

Archive for February 28, 2010

Wellmark Raises Individual Insurance Premiums in Iowa

Wellmark Raises Individual Insurance Premiums in Iowa


by Paul Deaton

In
many ways, buying health insurance is similar to buying a lottery
ticket. We hope for the best when time comes for the drawing, knowing
that the odds of winning are against us.”


Like many Iowans on an individual health insurance policy, we received our premium change notice from Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Iowa this week. The premium is increasing by 18% effective April 1. With the increase, it is still 31% less expensive than the COBRA coverage premium we had been paying after my retirement, so I am not complaining. The trouble with health insurance is not the premium; it is the uncertainty about what we are buying for the premium.

The biggest worry is that the coverage will be canceled if we get sick, or that the coverage won’t adequately cover a potential illness. Being self employed, and with Wellmark being the dominant health insurance provider in the state, there are not many other options if the coverage is canceled. I understand that experimental procedures are not covered. I understand that pre-existing conditions are not covered. I understand that there is a complex process of who pays for what and that initiation of coverage also began a dialectic between my doctor's office and Wellmark. Emblematic of this dialectic is that the doctor's office just last week reconciled the charges with Wellmark for the annual physical I took in July. Someone is making money on the cash float on this modest fee. It is neither the doctor's office nor us.

We make an assumption when we purchase health insurance. The assumption is that if we get sick, there will be coverage. At the same time, it is difficult to understand the provisions of the Wellmark contract. One of the terms on the application was that Wellmark reserved the right to refund all of my premiums and cancel the policy if something came up. In many ways, buying health insurance is similar to buying a lottery ticket. We hope for the best when time comes for the drawing, knowing that the odds of winning are against us.

Our health care system is flawed, on that, everyone agrees. What is less discussed is how the health insurance system in the United States is one more contributor to the transformation of society in the post Ronald Reagan era. In a dog eat dog world, we ask ourselves, “how can we protect our family?” The answer, at least partly, is don't expect others to take care of us. Certainly, don't expect this of insurance companies. Expect to be on our own.

We don't want government involved in our lives, but eventually we will have to rely on Medicare to protect us. We have been paying into this system for decades, so we hope it will be solvent when the time comes for enrollment. There are no guarantees.

We can accept that health insurance companies must manage their risks and in doing so, better manage their profitability. The service insurance companies provide must serve their profitability. If we want to participate in the process, that is our decision. What is hard to take is that the rules are often unclear. We feel like a pawn in their game, waiting for their next move. In the post Reagan era, that is about all we can expect.

~Paul Deaton is a native Iowan living in rural Johnson County.  Check
out his blog, Big Grove Garden.
 
  E-mail Paul Deaton

Watch for Dr. Alta Price's Health Care Reform Update every Tuesday here on Blog for Iowa.

A Culver-Roberts Matchup for Iowa Governor

A Culver-Roberts Match-up for Iowa Governor


by Paul Deaton

“Culver has
a strong statewide organization, significant financial resources and a
Democratic voter registration advantage. These things matter in
politics.”

Back in July 2009, I indicated that of the Republican candidates for governor in the June primary, the one to watch is Rod Roberts of Carroll. He is “all in,” having announced he will not seek re-election in the Iowa House so he can run for governor. While June is still distant in political terms and others lead him in the polls in comparisons with Governor Chet Culver; Roberts shouldn’t be counted out yet. Of the three remaining Republicans, Roberts seems to this writer to have the best chances of defeating incumbent Governor Chet Culver, if nominated by his party.

While Culver has been beleaguered by poor showings in polls, turnover in his campaign staff, noise from progressive radio talk show host Ed Fallon and a primary challenge from former Des Moines school board member John Narcisse, it seems inevitable that Chet Culver will receive his party’s nomination and win the 2010 election. He has a strong statewide organization, significant financial resources and a Democratic voter registration advantage. These things matter in politics. In a Culver-Branstad or Culver-Vander Plaats match-up, these basic elements of the Culver campaign would come into play and, despite the early polls and corporate media coverage would likely result in a second term for the incumbent governor.

A Culver-Roberts match-up might be a different story. Roberts has the credentials to attract the conservative Republican base. At the same time, his pragmatic approach to issues, like the Smoke-Free Iowa Act, indicates Roberts’ ability to appeal to moderates. Pulling together the Republican base and a substantial proportion of moderate Republicans and independents is the only path to a Republican governor in 2011. Roberts is best positioned to do this as Vander Plaats seems too extreme and Branstad offers nothing new.

It seems doubtful that Rod Roberts will make it through the June primary because of the strength of his two primary opponents. The current Republican activism may have led House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen to say, “the trend lines clearly indicate this should be a strong year for Republicans” on Iowa Press last Friday. At the same time, while the fall campaign will be challenging, Culver will likely prevail in the gubernatorial race because of the strength of his organization against a likely match-up with a former governor.

That former governor has little to offer except a “back to the future” visage behind which are popular talking points articulated by a corporate media intent on gaining viewership or selling newspapers. This election will be about real people and real issues, and not about the chimera of a right wing resurgence being popularized by politicians and other folks who are out of touch with what is important to the majority of Iowans.

Governor Culver, get your game on and fast, because if Roberts is out, the stars are aligning in your favor and the 2010 election will be yours to lose.

~Paul Deaton is a native Iowan living in rural Johnson County.  Check
out his blog, Big Grove Garden.
 
  E-mail Paul Deaton

Kingisms
?